Abstract
When I first began to notice Chaucer projecting himself into talking birds, I became disenchanted with his dismissal of these vibrant voices, especially since he linked them with the voices of similarly dismissed women. But then I began to see that his lively avian performances also work to shift the emphasis of these stories in a way that lets the animal world into the equation, and this intriguing possibility suggested further thought.
Taak any bryd, and put it in a cage,
And do al thyn entente and thy corage
To foster it tendrely with mete and drynke
Of all deyntees that thou kanst bithynke,
And keep it al so clenly as thou may,
Although his cage of gold be never so gay,
Yet hath this brid, by twenty thousand foold,
Levere in a forest that is rude and coold
Goon ete wormes and swich wrecchednesse.
For evere this brid wol doon his bisynesse
To escape out of his cage, yif he may.
His libertee this brid desireth ay.
Flessh is so newefangel …
Chaucer, Manciple’s Tale 163–74, 193
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Susan Crane, “For the Birds,” Studies in the Age of Chaucer: The Yearbook of the New Chaucer Society 29 (2007): 32.
Akira Mizuta Lippit, Electric Animal: Toward a Rhetoric of Wildlife (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000), p. 166.
All Chaucer citations are from The Riverside Chaucer, 3rd ed. gen ed. Larry D. Benson (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987), by line number.
Sarah Stanbury, “Ecochaucer: Green Ethics and Medieval Nature,” Chaucer Review 39.1 (2004): 13.
See also Rebecca M. Douglass, “Ecocriticism and Middle English Literature,” Studies in Medievalism X (1998): 136–63.
Brian Striar, “The Manciple’s Tale and Chaucer’s Apolline Poetics,” Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts 33.2 (Spring 1991): 197.
Carolynn Van Dyke, Chaucer’s Agents: Cause and Representation in Chaucerian Narrative (Madison, NJ: Farleigh Dickinson UP, 2006), p. 101.
William Kuskin, ed., Caxton’s Trace: Studies in the History of English Printing (Notre Dame, IN: U of Notre Dame P, 2006), p. 15. I am indebted to Bill Fahrenbach for this reference.
Patricia Ingham, “Little Nothings: The Squire’s Tale and the Ambition of Gadgets,” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 31 (2009): 67–69.
Jill Mann, From Aesop to Reynard: Beast Literature in Medieval Britain (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009), p. 193.
Giovanni Boccaccio, The Decameron, trans. G. H. McWilliam, 2nd ed. (New York: Penguin, 2003), pp. 425–32.
See Helen Macdonald, Falcon (London: Reaktion Books, 2006), p. 135.
Copyright information
© 2011 Lesley Kordecki
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kordecki, L. (2011). Epilogue: Uncaging Chaucer’s Animal Voice. In: Ecofeminist Subjectivities. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337893_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337893_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29665-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-33789-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)