Abstract
Approaching a research topic implies assuming ideological elements that represent the location and identity of the researcher, defined from her1 social, psychological, and historical situation. These elements become evident through various expressions throughout her lifelong relationship with knowledge and constitute what Morin, based on Lorenz’s work, characterizes as imprinting? Linking ourselves to a work theme presupposes, as well, accepting that our constructions are the result of readings, monologues, and dialogues; together with public and private, individual and collective reflections that obey internal interests and external demands materialized in writings that are often insufficient for expressing our initial intentions. Often the work is being constructed through following a personal story; it is the result of questions that have arisen during previous reflections that have awakened the need to stop at points of special concern. This work is also one’s answer to others’ perceptions that have seemed erroneous or false to us, and that may have a multiplicity of origins. All this is a crucial part of the intellectual history of the field and of the individual scholar.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
de Alba, Alicia. 1993. “El Currículum Universitario de Cara al Nuevo Milenio.” In University Curriculum Faced with the New Millennium, 29–45. Mexico City: CESU-UNAM; Plaza y Valdés.
de Alba, Alicia. 2002. Curriculum Universitario. Académicos y Futuro Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés.
Angulo, Rita, and Bertha Orozco, eds. 2007. “Alternativas Metodológicas De Intervención Curricular En Educación Superior.” Colección Educación, Debates e Imaginario Social. Serie Curriculum y Siglo XXI. Mexico City: Coedición CONACyT/Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero/Seminario Currículum y Siglo XXI del IISUE-UNAM/Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí/Universidad Autónoma Chapingo/Plaza y Valdés.
Phillips, D.C., Alicia de Alba, and Raquel Glazman. 2007. “Diálogos Sobre Investigación Educativa.” IX Congreso de Investigación Educativa, Yucatán México, November 17, 2007.
Casarini, Ratto Martha. 1997. Teoría y diseño curricular Mexico City: Trillas.
Díaz-Barriga, Ángel. ed. 1997. Curriculum, Evaluación y Planeación Educativas Mexico City: COMIE, CESU ENEP Iztacala.
Díaz Barriga, Frida. 2003. “Main Trends of Curriculum Research in Mexico.” In International Handbook of Curriculum Research, ed. William F. Pinar, 457–469. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Díaz Barriga, Frida, Ma. De Lourdes Lule, Pacheco Pinzón Diana, Rojas-Drumond Silvia, and Saad Dayan Elisa 1992. Metodología de Diseño Curricular Para Educación Superior Mexico City: Trillas.
Díaz Barriga, Frida and Elisa Lugo. 2003. “Desarrollo Del Curriculo.” En La Investigación Curricular en México. La Década de Los Noventa, ed. Ángel Díaz Barriga, 63–93. Mexico City: COMIE, SEP CESU.
ENEP-Iztacala. 1982. “Jornadas VII Aniversario.” Mexico City: UNAM. Furlán, Alfredo, Ortega Pérez Faustino, Remedí Vicente Eduardo, Campos.
Furlán, Alfredo, and Miguel Pasillas. 1989. Desarrollo de la investigación en el campo del currículo Mexico City: ENEP-I. UNAM.
Furlán, Alfredo. 1997. Ideología del discurso curricular Mexico City: UAS.
Glazman, Raquel. 1979. “Trece Principios que Deben Considerarse en el Cambio de la Educación Superior.” Revista de la Unión de Universidades de América Latina 77: 711–721.
Glazman, Raquel. 1975. “Los Estudiantes y el Plan de Estudios.” Deslinde. Serie Nuevos Métodos de Enseñanza. Comisión Nuevos Métodos de Enseñanza. Dirección General de Difusión Cultural. Departamento de Humanidades. Mexico City: UNAM.
Glazman, Raquel. 1990. La Universidad Pública: La Ideología en el Vínculo Investigación-Docencia Mexico City: Editorial El Caballito.
Glazman, Raquel. 2001. Evaluación y Exclusión en la Enseñanza Superior Mexico City: Editorial Paidós Mexicana.
Glazman, Raquel. 2005. Coordinadora y Editora. Las Caras de la Evaluación Mexico City: FFL and DGAPA Publicada.
Glazman, Raquel, and de Ibarrola, María. 1987. Planes de Estudios Propuestas Institucionales y Realidad Curricular Mexico City: Nueva Imagen.
Glazman, Raquel, and de Ibarrola, María. 1980. Diseño de Planes de Estudios Mexico City: CISE-UNAM.
Morin, Edgar Los. 1999. Siete Saberes Necesarios Para la Educación Del Futuro Paris: UNESCO.
Pinar, William, William Reynolds, Patrick Slattery, and Peter Taubman. 1995. Understanding Curriculum New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, William, ed. 2003. International Handbook of Curriculum Research Mahwah, NJ, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Pinar, William. 2004. What is Curriculum Theory? Mahwah, NJ, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2011 William F. Pinar
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Glazman-Nowalski, R. (2011). Revisiting Curriculum Studies. In: Pinar, W.F. (eds) Curriculum Studies in Mexico. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337886_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337886_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29612-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-33788-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)