Abstract
Exhibitions, or world’s fairs, were popular events in Europe, Great Britain, the United States, and many European colonies during the second half of the nineteenth century.1 Host cities included Paris, London, Vienna, and Philadelphia, as well as Hobart, Melbourne, and Sydney in Britain’s Australian colonies. Such spectacles appeared to display, in the words of one London weekly in the early 1860s, ‘nearly all possible and impossible things under the sun’, and seemingly did so without any differentiation between the profound and the banal, the permanent and the ephemeral.2 Visitors could observe pigs, as well as steam engines, performing fleas around the corner from paintings. That was ‘nearly’ the case in 1851 at the Great Exhibition in London’s Crystal Palace, the first world’s fair, as it was one generation later at a less ambitious colonial show, the Melbourne Intercolonial Exhibition in 1875. Thousands of visitors to the Australian show, for example, walked amidst and observed, if not in some cases sampled and purchased, Japanese vases, French hats, local wines and gold nuggets, American harvesters, and Australian Aboriginal weapons.3
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For information about major nineteenth-century exhibitions see, John E. Findling and Kimberly D. Pelle (eds) Encyclopedia of World’s Fairs and Expositions, 2nd edition (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2008); John Allwood, The Great Exhibitions (London: Studio Vista, 1977); Paul Greenhalgh, Ephemeral Vistas: The Exposition Universelles, Great Exhibitions, and World’s Fairs, 1851–1939 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988); Robert Rydell, All the World’s A Fair: Visions of Empire at American International Expositions, 1876–1916 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987); Robert Rydell (ed.) The Books of the Fairs: Materials About World’s Fairs, 1834–1916, in the Smithsonian Institution Libraries (Chicago: American Library Association, 1992), pp. 1–62.
French organizers employed a rather straightforward system to sort such exhibits according to basic scientific categories: ‘Chemistry’, ‘Mechanical Engineering’, and ‘Health’. See, John Allwood, ‘General Notes: International Exhibitions and the Classification of their Exhibits’, Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 128 (1980), 450–1; Richard D. Mandell, Paris 1900: The Great World’s Fair (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967), pp. 3–14. The scientific displays at the Great Exhibition are discussed in Jim Bennett, Science at the Exhibition (Cambridge: The Whipple Museum of the History of Science, 1983); Richard Bellow, ‘Science at the Crystal Focus of the World’, in Aileen Fyfre and Bernard Lightman (eds) Science in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century Sites and Experiences (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007), pp. 301–35.
‘The Museum and Library Report’, The School of Mines, Ballarat, Annual Report Presented at the Meeting of Governors, held January 24, 1882 (Ballarat: Charles Boyd, 1882), pp. 22–7.
Exhibition, Melbourne, 1854–Paris, 1855. Special Instructions for the Guidance of Local Committees and Intending Exhibitors (Melbourne: Office of the Commission, 1854), pp. 10–16.
Catalogue of the Natural and Industrial Products of New South Wales Exhibited in the Australian Museum by the Paris Commissioners, Sydney, November 1854 (Sydney: Reading and Wellbank, 1854), pp. 41–70.
Official Catalogue of the Natural and Industrial Products of New South Wales, Forwarded to the Universal Exposition of 1878, at Paris (Sydney: Thomas Richards, Government Printer, 1878), pp. 61–78.
Eugene Rimmel, Recollections of the Paris Exhibition of 1867 (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & Co., 1867), pp. 331–2.
New South Wales. Official Catalogue of Exhibits from the Colony, Forwarded to the Colonial and Indian Exhibition, London, 1886 (Sydney: Thomas Richards, Government Printer, 1886), pp. 74–5, 348.
For example, see Mueller, ‘Names of Different Woods, etc., Used by the Yarra Natives for Weapons and Implements’, Intercolonial Exhibition of Australasia, Melbourne, 1866–67. Containing Introduction, Catalogues, Reports and Awards of the Juries, Essays, and Statistics on the Social and Economic Resources of the Australasian Colonies. Linden Gillbank discusses some of Mueller’s exhibition activities in ‘Scientific and Public Duties: Ferdinand Mueller’s Forest Contributions to Exhibitions and a Museum’, in Kate Darian-Smith, Richard Gillespie, Caroline Jordan, and Elizabeth Willis (eds) Seize the Day: Exhibitions, Australia and the World (Clayton, Victoria: Monash University ePress, 2008), pp. 7.21.1–21.13; idem., ‘Nineteenth-Century Perceptions of Victorian Forests: Ideas and Concerns of Ferdinand Mueller’, in John Dargavel and Sue Feary (eds) Australia’s Ever-Changing Forests II: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Australian Forest History (Canberra: Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, 1993), pp. 7–8.
Lionel L. Gilbert, ‘Plants, Politics and Personalities in Nineteenth-Century New South Wales’, Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society 56 (1970), 5–35.
For example, Joseph Hooker took advantage of such imperial networks of collectors, correspondence, and exchanges, to and from his site at the metropolitan center. That network included connections to and from Australia and New Zealand. See Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2008).
The Exposition of 1851; or Views of the Industry, the Science, and the Government of England, 2nd edition (London: John Murray, 1851), pp. 190–201.
‘“Introductory Discourse Delivered at the Opening of the Sydney Mechanics” School of Arts, April 23, 1833, by the Rev. Henry Carmichael, A.M. Vice-President of that Institution’, The New South Wales Magazine 1 (1833), 78.
Nathan Reingold and Marc Rothenberg, ‘Introduction’, Scientific Colonialism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1987), pp. vii–xiii; Roderick W. Home and Sally Kohlstedt (eds) ‘Introduction’, International Science and National Scientific Identity: Australia Between Britain and America (Boston: Kluwer, 1991), pp. 1–17.
Scholarship on ‘settler science’, or science in settler colonies and societies, is now rather extensive. See, for example, Katrina Dean, ‘Inscribing Settler Science: Ernest Rutherford, Thomas Laby and the Making of Careers in Physics’, History of Science 41 (2003), 217–40.
Ian Inkster, ‘Scientific Enterprise and the Colonial ‘Model:’ Observations on Australian Experience in Historical Context’, Social Studies of Science 15 (1985), 677–704; Donald Fleming, ‘Science in Australia, Canada, and the United States: Come Comparative Remarks’, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of the History of Science, 1962 1 (1964), 179–96; George Basalla, ‘The Spread of Western Science’, Science 156 (1967), 611–22.
For a review of the various approaches to studying science in European colonies, see Roy MacLeod, ‘Introduction’, in Roy Macleod (ed.) Nature and Empire: Science and the Colonial Enterprise, Osiris, Vol. 15, 2nd series (2000), 1–13 and MacLeod, ‘Discovery and Exploration’ in Peter J. Bowler and John V. Pickstone (eds) The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 6: The Modern Biological and Earth Sciences (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 34–57.
The rich scholarly literature on the nature and roles of networks in the British Empire includes: Catherine Delmas, Christine Vandamme and Donna Spalding Andreolle (eds) Science and Empire in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010); Zoe Laidlaw, Colonial Connections, 1815–1845: Patronage, the Information Revolution and Colonial Government (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005); Roy MacLeod (ed.) Government and Expertise: Specialists, Administrators and Professionals, 1860–1919 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988); Natasha Glaiser, ‘Networking, Trade and Exchange in the Eighteenth-Century British Empire’, The Historical Journal 47 (2004), 451–76; Simon Potter, ‘Webs, Networks, an Systems: Globalization and the Mass Media in the Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century British Empire’, Journal of British Studies 46 (2007), 621–46; Alan Lester, ‘Imperial Circuits and Networks: Geographies of the British Empire’, History Compass 4 (2006), 124–41. Network analysis has also contributed to the convergence of the fields of world history and the history of science in recent years. For example, see Simon Schaffer, Lissa Roberts, Kapil Raj and James Delbourgo (eds) The Brokered World: Go-Betweens and Global Intelligence, 1770–1820 (Sagamore Beach, MA: Science History Publications, 2009).
‘Postscript: New Directions for Scholarship about World Expos’, in Darian-Smith, Gillespie, Jordan and Willis (eds) Seize the Day, pp. 21.1–21.13.
Helpful discussions of popular and public science include Faidra Papanelopoulou, Agusti Nieto-Galan, and Enrique Perdiguero (eds) Popularizing Science and Technology in the European Periphery, 1800–2000 (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009); ‘Focus: Historicizing “Popular Science”’, special issue of Isis 100, 2 (2009), 310–68; Peter J. Bowler, ‘Popular Science’, in Bowler and Pickstone (eds) The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 6, pp. 622–33.
The Objects of a Botanic Garden in Relation to Industries. A Lecture Delivered at the Industrial and Technological Museum, Melbourne, by Baron Ferdinand von Mueller, on 23rd November, 1871 (Melbourne: Mason, Firth and McCutcheon, 1871), p. 6.
For discussion of networks and ‘social capital’, see Nan Lin, Karen Cook and Ronald S. Burt (eds) Social Capital: Theory and Research (New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 2001); Matthew O. Jackson, Social and Economic Networks (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008). Also see the discussion in Tamson Pietsch’s chapter in this volume.
J.M. Powell, ‘Exiled from the Garden: Von Mueller’s Correspondence with Kew, 1871–1881’, Victorian Historical Journal 48 (1977), 313–20.
For example, see Sanjeev Goyal, Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).
Roderick W. Home, Australian Science in the Making (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. viii.
Everett Mendelsohn, ‘The Emergence of Science as a Profession in Nineteenth-Century Europe’, in Karl Hill (ed.) The Management of Scientists (Boston: Beacon Press, 1964), pp. 3–48; Ruth Barton, ‘“Men of Science”: Language, Identity and Professionalization in the Mid-Victorian Scientific Community’, History of Science 41 (2003), 73–120.
George Stocking, Victorian Anthropology (New York: The Free Press, 1987), p. 239.
Doug Morrison and Ivan Barko suggest that the first formal scientific experiment in the Australian colonies took place in Botany Bay in 1788. See ‘Dagelet and Dawes: Their Meeting, Their Instruments and the First Scientific Experiments on Australian Soil’, Historical Records of Australian Science 20 (2009), 1–40.
Alan Atkinson, ‘Time, Place and Paternalism: Early Conservative Thinking in New South Wales’, Australian Historical Studies 23 (1988), 1–18.
John Stuart Mill, ‘Civilization’, in J.B. Schneewind (ed.) Essays on Literature and Society (New York: Collier Books, 1965), p. 155.
Similar to expositions, mechanics’ institutes also provided practical and general information in various different formats, including lectures, displays, experiments and libraries. For a helpful early document, see ‘Introductory Discourse Delivered at the Opening of the Sydney Mechanics’ School of Arts, April 23, 1833, by the Rev. Henry Carmichael, A.M. Vice-President of that Institution’, The New South Wales Magazine 1 (1833). The relationship between science and such nineteenth-century Australian mechanics’ institutes, learned societies, and public cultural institutions are discussed in Jan Kociumbas, ‘Science as Cultural Ideology: Museums and Mechanics’ Institutes in Early New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land’, Labour History (Australia) 64 (1993), 17–33; D.I. McDonald, ‘The Diffusion of Scientific and Other Useful Knowledge’, Journal of the Royal Australian Historical Society 54 (1968), 176–93; George Nadel, Australia’s Colonial Culture: Ideas, Men, and Institutions in Mid-Nineteenth Century Eastern Australia (Melbourne: F.W. Cheshire, 1957); Ian Wilkinson, ‘The Battle for the Museum: Frederick McCoy and the Establishment of the National Museum of Victoria at the University of Melbourne’, Historical Records of Australian Science 11 (1996), 1–11; Paul Fox, ‘The State Library of Victoria: Science and Civilisation’, Transition (1988), 14–16; Home, Australian Science in the Making, pp. vii–xxvii.
Transactions of the Royal Society of Victoria 5 (1860), 4.
‘Sir Henry Barkly’s Inaugural Address to the Royal Society, April 10, 1860’, Transactions of the Royal Society of Victoria 5 (1860), 9–10.
Rev. Henry Carmichael, ‘Introductory Discourse Delivered at the Opening of the Sydney Mechanics’ School of Arts, April 25, 1833’, pp. 213–14.
Elizabeth Hartrick, ‘“Curiosities and Rare Scientific Instruments”: Colonial Conversazioni in Australia and New Zealand in the 1870s and 1880s’, in Darian-Smith, Gillespie, Jordan and Willis (eds) Seize the Day, pp. 11.1–11.19.
Thomas Richards, The Imperial Archive: Knowledge and the Fantasy of Empire (New York: Verso, 1993); MacLeod (ed.) Government and Expertise.
William Westgarth, Half a Century of Australasian Progress, A Personal Retrospect (London: Sampson Low, Marston, Searle & Rivington, 1889), pp. 60–2.
That relationship is discussed in light of the Melbourne International Exhibition of 1880–1 in Paul Fox, ‘Exhibition City: Melbourne and the 1880 International Exhibition’, Transition 31 (1990), 68–9.
‘Anniversary Address, Delivered 12th May, 1875, by Rev. W.B. Clarke, M.A., F.G.S., etc., Vice-President’, Transactions of the Royal Society of New South Wales 9 (1875), pp. 1–5.
Elena Grainger, The Remarkable Reverend Clarke: The Life and Times of the Father of Australian Geology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).
Catalogue of the Natural and Industrial Products of New South Wales Forwarded to the Paris Universal Exposition of 1867, by the New South Wales Exhibition Commissioners (Sydney: Thomas Richards, Government Printer, 1867).
Ian Inkster, ‘Introduction: Aspects of the History of Science and Science Culture in Britain, 1780–1850 and Beyond’, in Ian Inkster and Jack Morrell (eds) Metropolis and Province: Science in British Culture, 1780–1850 (London: Hutchison, 1983), pp. 11–54; Arnold Thackray, ‘Natural Knowledge in Cultural Context: The Manchester Model’, American Historical Review 79 (1974), 672–709.
That phrase is from David A. Gerber, ‘The Pathos of Exile: Old Lutheran Refugees in the United States and South Australia’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 26 (1984), 498–522.
Roderick W. Home, ‘Ferdinand Mueller: Migration and the Sense of Self’, Historical Records of Australian Science 11 (1997), 311–24; idem., ‘The Problem of Intellectual Isolation in Scientific Life: W.H. Bragg and the Australian Scientific Community, 1886–1909’, Historical Records of Australian Science 6 (1984), 19–30.
The history of resource management and land development is considered in J.M. Powell, An Historical Geography of Modern Australia: The Restive Fringe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988); Joseph M. Powell and Michael Williams (eds) Australian Space/Australian Time: Geographical Perspectives (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1975). For consideration of economic development, settler colonialism, and environmental history see, J.M. Powell, ‘Historical Geography and Environmental History: An Australian Interface’, Journal of Historical Geography 22 (1996), 253–73; Thomas Dunlap, Nature and the English Diaspora: Environment and History in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999); idem., ‘Australian Nature, European Culture: Anglo Settlers in Australia’, Environmental History Review 17 (1993), 25–48.
Sally Gregory Kohlstedt, ‘Australian Museums of Natural History: Public Priorities and Scientific Initiatives in the 19th Century’, Historical Records of Australian Science 5 (1983), 17; Inkster, ‘Scientific Enterprise and the Colonial “Model”’, p. 699.
James Belich, Replenishing the Earth: The Settler Revolution and the Rise of the Anglo-World (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Peter H. Hoffenberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoffenberg, P.H. (2011). ‘A Science of Our Own’: Nineteenth Century Exhibitions, Australians and the History of Science. In: Bennett, B.M., Hodge, J.M. (eds) Science and Empire. Britain and the World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230320826_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230320826_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32190-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-32082-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)