Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

  • 242 Accesses

Abstract

The saying ‘A promise is a promise’ implies that it is obvious what a promise is and when it is fulfilled. It suggests that we intuitively can judge what should or should not be considered a promise.1 Intuition, however, is not a sufficient condition in a scholarly approach to empirical investigations of election promises. In this chapter, I will describe the most obvious common denominators in the choices that scholars make when they define election promises and fulfilled election promises. This is important for the coming discussion about whether or not it is reasonable to claim that scholars’ choices of definitions can explain why citizens and scholars seem to come to different conclusions.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Elin Naurin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naurin, E. (2011). Definitions of Election Promises in Empirical Research. In: Election Promises, Party Behaviour and Voter Perceptions. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319301_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics