Skip to main content

Situating the Particular: After Constructivism

  • Chapter
A Whole New World

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

If the tension between realism and liberalism provides the main axis of debate within international studies, there is also a series of critiques that have been addressed to one or both of these approaches. Two lines of analysis have been paramount in that regard. One line starts with the post-modern work inspired by Foucault and others, and is represented for instance by the writings of Rob Walker. It then winds itself through the Habermasian critical theory exemplified by the work of Andrew Linklater, and finally culminates in the constructivist literature mainly identified with Alexander Wendt’s work. The goal of that literature is to show that a series of assumptions about the nature of knowledge, identity, and interest underlie both realism and liberalism, and that these assumptions are historically specific in that they stem from particular historical and intellectual developments. The logic of power, human identity, rationality, and suchlike, which the realists and the liberals build on all these starting premises, are thus themselves historically contingent. What they present as universal elements of international politics on the basis of that logic remains, in that sense, nothing more than the effect of particular circumstances and conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The best introduction in English to Foucault is Paul Rabinow, ed., The Foucault Reader (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Also see, from the works of Foucault himself, Michel Foucault, The Order of Things (London: Tavistock, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. The best introduction in English to Derrida’s work might be Jacques Derrida, Writing and Difference (Translated by Alan Bass) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Also see Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology (Translated by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak) (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, as an example: Richard K. Ashley, “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique,” Millennium 17, 2 (1988), 227–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See for instance David Campbell, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. B. J. Walker, Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. On this theme, see for instance Jürgen Habermas, “An Alternative Way out of the Philosophy of the Subject: Communicative versus Subject-Centered Reason,” in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures (Translated by Frederick Lawrence) (Boston: MIT Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andrew Linklater, Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andrew Linklater, Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations (London: Macmillan, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 38.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Maja Zehfuss, Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Bill McSweeney, Security, Identity, and Interests: A Sociology of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See, amongst others, Stefano Guzzini and Anna Leander, eds, Constructivism and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Another important study on the place of constructivism in the evolution of international studies is K. M. Fierke and Knud Erik Jrargensen, Constructing International Relations — The Next Generation (Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibid, 202. Wendt quotes from Roger Benjamin and Raymond Duvall, “The Capitalist State in Context,” in Roger Benjamin, ed., The Democratic State (Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press, 1985), 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Alexander Wendt, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Constmction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46, 2 (1992), 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. See Immanuel Wallerstein, The Capitalist World-Economy, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. The most elaborate expression of Wallertein’s views is found in the different volumes of The Modern World-System. See Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System, Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Centuty; Vol. 2: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750; The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy (San Diego: Academic Press, 1974, 1980, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  22. The clearest expression of the dependency theory is perhaps found in Fernando Henrique Cardoso and Enzo Faletto, Dependency and Development in Latin America (Translated by Marjory Mattingly Urquidi) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Also see Andres Gunder Frank, Dependent Accumulation and Underdevelopment (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  24. On these themes of space and time in Wallerstein’s work, see for instance Stephen Hobden and Richard Wyn Jones, “Marxist Theories of International Relations,” in John Baylis and Steve Smith, eds, The Globalization of World Politics. An Introduction to International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karl Marx, “The German Ideology,” in Lloyd D. Easton and Kurt H. Guddat, eds, Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society (New York: Doubleday, 1967), 409. Emphasis in the original.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Marx and Engels, “The Communist Manifesto,” in D. McLennan, ed., Karl Marx. Selected Writings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), 224–225.

    Google Scholar 

  27. This quotation taken from Andrew Linklater, “Marxism,” in Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater, eds, with Richard Devetak, Matthew Paterson, and Jacquie True, Theories of International Relations (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1996), 123.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See, for example: Theda Skocpol, States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. See, amongst others, Stephen Gill, ed., Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. or, more recently, Stephen Gill, Power and Resistance in the New World Order, 2nd ed. (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. On the Gramscian approach, see Alison J. Ayers, Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory. Modern Princes and Naked Emperors (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Robert W. Cox, Production, Power, and World Order. Social Forces in the Making of History (New York: Columbia Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Antonio Gramsci, Selection from the Prison Notebooks (Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith) (New York: International Publishers, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Timothy J. Sinclair’s comments on the concepts in his “Beyond International Relations Theory: Robert W. Cox and Approaches to World Order,” in Robert W. Cox with Timothy J. Sinclair, eds, Approaches to World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 11. For Cox’s use of the phrase, see Robert Cox, “Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,” Millennium 10, 2 (Summer 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cox, “Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” The text quoted here is published in Robert O. Keohane, ed., Neorealism and/its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), 207. Emphasis in the original.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Pierre P. Lizée

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lizée, P.P. (2011). Situating the Particular: After Constructivism. In: A Whole New World. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316843_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics