Skip to main content

The Narrative Turn in History

  • Chapter
Narrating the Past
  • 276 Accesses

Abstract

The question of whether ‘the discipline of history is essentially a narrative mode of knowing, understanding, explaining and reconstructing the past’ has been described as ‘the most important and central debate in the philosophy of history since the 1960s’.1 As this debate has developed, historiography has undergone a linguistic turn inspired by structuralist and poststructuralist thought, leading to the emergence of so-called post-modernist history.2 Since the 1980s this has had a considerable impact on how literary scholars and novelists have thought about the past, provoking a historical turn evident in new historicism and the emergence of historiographic metafiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Geoffrey Roberts, ‘Introduction’, in The History and Narrative Reader, ed. Geoffrey Roberts (2001), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. On the recent history of historiography, see Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question’ and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge, 1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Georg Iggers, Historiography in the Twentieth Century ( Hanover, NH, 1997 )

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elizabeth A. Clark, History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn (Cambridge, MA, 2004 )

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geoff Eley, A Crooked Line: From Cultural History to the History of Society (Ann Arbor, 2005); The Postmodern History Reader, ed. Keith Jenkins (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Ulric Neisser, ‘Self-Narratives: True and False’, in The Remembering Self: Construction and Accuracy in the Self-narrative, ed. Ulric Neisser and Robyn Fivush (Cambridge, 1994), 1–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (Harmondsworth, 1968), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reinhart Koselleck, Zeitschichten: Studien zur Historik (Frankfurt a.M., 2000), 247–8, 249; my translation.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David Lowenthal, The Past is a Foreign Country (Cambridge, 1985) surveys responses to survivals from the past.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ralph Waldo Emerson, ‘Nature’, in Selected Essays, ed. Larzer Ziff (Harmondsworth, 1982), 35

    Google Scholar 

  11. cf. Emerson, ‘The American Scholar’; Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie für das Leben’, in Werke in drei Bänden, ed. Karl Schlechta (München, 1969), I, 209–85

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence (New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stephen Greenblatt, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Oxford, 1988), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keith Jenkins, ‘A Postmodern Reply to Perez Zagorin’, History and Theory, 39 (2000) 181–200; 184

    Google Scholar 

  15. F.R. Ankersmit, ‘Reply to Professor Zagorin’, History and Theory, 29 (1990) 275–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Compare, for example, C. Behan McCullagh, The Truth of History (1998), 5, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peter Gay, Style in History (New York, 1974), 210; quoted in Berkhofer, Beyond the Great Story, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hayden White, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe ( Baltimore, MD, 1973 ), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See F.R. Ankersmit, Historical Representation (Stanford, 2001), passim

    Google Scholar 

  20. John Zammito. Ankersmit, Historical Representation (Stanford, 2001), passim

    Google Scholar 

  21. John Zammito, ‘Ankersmit and Historical Representation’, History and Theory, 44 (2005) 155–81

    Google Scholar 

  22. Compare McCullagh, The Truth of History, 23, 114. On collective assumptions, see Mary Fulbrook, Historical Theory (2002), 66–72; on intersubjective acceptability, see Fulbrook, Historical Theory, 107–21; Zammito, ‘Ankersmit and Historical Representation’, 177–81. White dismisses such arguments in Tropics, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge [1979] (Manchester, 1984). Earlier critiques of metanarratives, from Ranke’s in 1824 to Karl Popper and Karl Löwith, are noted in Perez Zagorin, ‘History, the Referent, and Narrative: Reflections on Postmodernism Now’, History and Theory, 38 (1999) 1–24; 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. W.H. Walsh, Philosophy of History: An Introduction, rev. edn (New York, 1967), 59–63; W.H. Walsh, ‘Colligatory Concepts in History’, in The Philosophy of History, ed. Patrick Gardiner (Oxford, 1974 ), 127–44.

    Google Scholar 

  25. David Herman, Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative (Lincoln, NE, 2002), 89 and Ch. 3 passim.

    Google Scholar 

  26. David Carr, ‘Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continuity’, History and Theory, 25 (1986) 117–31; quotations below from 122, 125. Cf. Ricoeur, Time and Narrative, I, 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kathleen Canning, ‘Feminist History after the Linguistic Turn: Historicizing Discourse and Experience’, Signs, 19 (1994) 368–404; 369.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Michel Foucault, The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality, vol. 1 [1976] (1998); quotations in this paragraph from 93, 95, 92, 94, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patrick H. Hutton, ‘The History of Mentalities: The New Map of Cultural History’, History and Theory, 20 (1981) 237, 238.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York, 1973), 28. Greenblatt discusses Geertz’s influence in Catherine Gallagher and Stephen Greenblatt, Practicing New Historicism (Chicago, 2000), 20–31.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York, 1972), 191.

    Google Scholar 

  32. These traditions are analysed in Christopher Lloyd, The Structures of History ( Oxford and Cambridge, MA, 1993 )

    Google Scholar 

  33. Malcolm Waters, Modern Sociological Theory (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nicos P. Mouzelis, Modern and Postmodern Social Theorizing: Bridging the Divide (Cambridge, 2008 ); The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, ed. Bryan S. Turner (Chichester, 2009 ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. See John B. Thompson, ‘The Theory of Structuration’, in Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and his Critics, ed. David Held and John B. Thompson (Cambridge, 1989 ), 56–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Louis O. Mink, ‘Philosophical Analysis and Historical Understanding’, Review of Metaphysics, 21 (1968) 667–98; 691.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arthur C. Danto, Narration and Knowledge (New York, 2007), 294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Alan David Robinson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, A. (2011). The Narrative Turn in History. In: Narrating the Past. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316744_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics