Advertisement

Home

  • Jennifer V. Evans
Part of the Genders and Sexualities in History book series (GSX)

Abstract

In a federal youth services memorandum of April 1958, an unknown author outlined the current state of youth criminal policy in the German Democratic Republic. “Unlike in West Germany,” they wrote, “in the GDR, delinquency is no longer the product of war and fascism as it was in the years after 1945.” Implicitly connected to the evils of capitalism and not the aftermath of total war, juvenile delinquency was less of a problem in East Germany, apparently, due to the social character of the Workers’ and Farmers’ State. Contemporary cases of youth endangerment and criminality owed their existence not to the lingering stain of prewar social discipline, the author suggested, but to the inadequate application of socialist educational methods. Indeed, such programs were either unknown or “not uniformly applied by those responsible for instituting policy.”3 This example of double speak - the initial down-playing of youth crime followed by attempts to foist responsibility on the ill-conceived actions of rogue caseworkers and incomplete socialist acculturation - is illustrative of the mechanisms of governance at work in the insecure East German regime. What it fails to take into account, however, is that on both sides of the boundary, and in Cold War Berlin especially, the rise in postwar youth crime posed a host of difficult challenges for police, court, and youth welfare workers in the first decades after the war.4

Keywords

Train Station Juvenile Delinquency Young Offender Youth Service Penal Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Cited in Emnie Sevgi Özdamar, “My Berlin,” in Berlin Tales, trans. Lyn Marven, ed. Helen Constantine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 99.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    For a statistical analysis of pre- and post-1945 criminality and recidivism, see Edward Ross Dickenson, “Policing Sex in Germany, 1882–1982: A Preliminary Statistical Analysis,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 6.2 (2007), 236.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Thomas Lindenberger, “‘Asoziale Lebensweise.’ Herrschaftslegitimation, Sozialdisziplinierung und die Konstruktion eines ‘negativen Milieus’ in der SED-Diktatur,”Geschichte und Gesellschaft 32 (2005): 227–54; “Rowdies im Systemkonflikt. Geheime und öffentliche Bilder der Jugenddelinquenz im Staatssozialismus,” Jahrbuch für Jugendforschung (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2005), 51–70.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    LAB B Rep. 280, Aufruf der CDU, June 26, 1945. See Uta G. Poiger, Jazz, Rock and Rebels: Cold War Politics and American Culture in Divided Germany (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), especially chapter 3, “Lonely Crowds and Skeptical Generations: Depoliticizing and Repoliticizing Consumer Culture,” 106–36.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Sara Ahmed, Claudia Castaneda, Anne-Marie Fortier and Mimi Sheller, eds., Uprootings/Regroundings: Questions of Home and Migration (Oxford: Berg, 2006)Google Scholar
  6. Alison Blunt and R. Dowling, Home (London: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar
  7. Alison Blunt and A. Varley, “Geographies of Home: An Introduction,” Cultural Geographies 11 (2004): 3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. David Sibley, Geographies of Exclusion (London: Routledge, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 12.
    Edward Ross Dickinson, The Politics of German Child Welfare from the Empire to the Federal Republic (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
  10. Dietrich Oberwittler, “Von Strafe zur Erziehung? Zur Entwickllung der Jugendkriminalpolitik in England und Deutschland, ca. 1850–1920,” PhD dissertation, Trier, 1998, and Von der Strafe zur Erziehung: Jugendkriminalpolitik in England und Deutschland 1850–1920 (Frankfurt am Main, 2000)Google Scholar
  11. Young Sun-Hong, Welfare, Modernity, and the Weimar State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Edward Ross Dickinson, “‘Until the Stubborn Will is Broken.’ Crisis and Reform in Prussian Reformatory Education, 1900–1934,” European History Quarterly (2002): 161–206Google Scholar
  13. Michelle Mouton, From Nurturing the Nation to Purifying the Volk: Weimar and Nazi Family Policy 1918–45 (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frank Biess, Homecomings: Returning POWs and the Legacies of Defeat in Postwar Germany (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar
  15. Robert G. Moeller, War Stories: The Search for a Usable Past in the Federal Republic of Germany (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elizabeth Heineman, What Difference Does a Husband Make? Marital Status in Nazi and Postwar Germany (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karl Bader, “Soziologie der Jugendkriminalität,” in Bekämpfung der Jugendkriminalität. Arbetisgagung im Bundeskriminalamt Wiesbaden vom 1. November bis 6. November über die Kriminalität der Jugendlichen und Heranwachsenden (Bundeskriminalamt Wiesbaden, 1955), 68.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hilde Thurnwald, Gegenwartsprobleme Berliner Familien: Eine soziologische Untersuchung an 498 Familien (Berlin: Weidmann, 1948).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    On the British case, see Joanna Bourke, “‘Going Home’: The Personal Adjustment of British and American Servicemen after the War,” in Life After Death: Approaches to a Culture and Social History of Europe During the 1940s and 1950s, ed. Richard Bessel and Dirk Schumann (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 149–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christina Benninghaus, “Verschlungene Pfade. Auf dem Weg zu einer Geschlechtergeschichte der Jugend,” in “Sag mir, wo die Mädchen sind…” Beiträge zur Geschlechtergeschichte der Jugend, ed. Christina Benninghaus and Kerstin Kohtz (Cologne: Böhlau, 1999), 19Google Scholar
  21. Martin Lücke, Männlichkeit und Unordnung: Homosexualität und männliche Prostitution in Kaiserreich und Weimarer Republik (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2008), 152Google Scholar
  22. Detlev Peukert, Grenzen der Sozialdisziplinierung: Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Jugendfu ‘rsorge, 1878–1932 (Cologne: Bund, 1986).Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    Annette F. Timm, “Sex with a Purpose: Prostitution, Venereal Disease and Militarized Masculinity in the Third Reich,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 11.1/2 (2002): 223–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 23.
    Andrew Bickford, “The Militarization of Masculinity in the Former German Democratic Republic,” in Military Masculinities: Identity and State, ed. Paul Higate (New York: Praeger Publishers, 2003), 157–74.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    In addition to Gerhard Jörns’s book Der Jugendwerkhof im Jugendhilfesystem der DDR, recent examples include: Gerrit Bratke, Die Kriminologie in der DDR und ihre Anwendung im Bereich der Jugenddelinquenz: Eine zeitgeschichtlich-kriminologische Untersuchung (Münster: LIT Verlag, 1999)Google Scholar
  26. Thomas Lindenberger, “Aufklären, zersetzen, liquidieren: Policing Juvenile Rowdytum in East Germany, 1956–1968,” unpublished paper presented to the annual German Studies Association conference, October 4–7, 2001, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  27. Dorothy Wierling, “Die Jugend als innerer Feind. Konflikte in der Erziehungsdiktatur der sechziger Jahre,” in Sozialgeschichte der DDR, ed. Hartmut Kaelble, Jürgen Kocka, and Hartmut Zwahr (Stuttgart: 1994), 404–25;, “Der Staat, die Jugend und der Westen. Texte zu Konflikten der 1960er Jahre,” in Akten. Eingaben. Schaufenster. Die DDR und ihre Texte. Erkundungen zu Herrschaft und Alltag, ed. Alf Lüdtke and Peter Becker (Berlin: 1997), 223–40; “The Hitler Youth Generation in the GDR: Insecurities, Ambitions and Dilemmas,” in Dictatorship as Experience: Towards a Socio- Cultural History of the GDR, ed. Konrad Jarausch (New York: Berghahn Press, 1999), 307–24Google Scholar
  28. Molly Wilkinson, “Building Bodies, Building Culture: Sports, Citizenship and National Identity in the German Democratic Republic, 1948–1990,” PhD (in progress). On the treatment of young offenders in West Germany, see Frank Kebbedies, Außer Kontrolle: Jugendkriminalität und Jugendkriminalpolitik in der NS-Zeit und der frühen Nachkriegszeit (Essen: Klartext Verlag, 2000).Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    Edward Dickinson suggests that during the Weimar Republic, two major pieces of legislation helped standardize a comprehensive, locally centralized child welfare policy, including municipal welfare agencies, the participation of religious charities, in addition to correctional education services and youth courts. See Dickinson, The Politics of German Child Welfare from the Empire to the Federal Republic, 153. For information on youth policy and penal reform initiatives in the Wilhelmine and Weimar years, see Christine Dörner, Erziehung Durch Strafe: die Geschichte der Jugendstrafe 1871–1945 (Weinheim: Juventa Verlag, 1996)Google Scholar
  30. Elizabeth Harvey, Youth and the Welfare State in Weimar Germany (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Derek S. Linton, “Who Has the Youth Has the Future”: The Campaign to Save Young Workers in Imperial Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peukert, Grenzen der Sozialdisziplinierung: and most recently Warren Rosenblum, Beyond the Prison Gates: Punishment and Welfare in Germany 1850–1933 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  33. 28.
    David Harvey, Paris, Capital of Modernity (New York: Routledge, 2003).Google Scholar
  34. 29.
    Peukert, Grenzen der Sozialdisziplinierung. There were a variety of ways in which adults could be committed to a workhouse, most notably through §361, 5 or §42d of the Penal Code in addition to corresponding welfare legislation. For more information see Wolfgang Ayass, Das Arbeitshaus Breitenau. Bettler, Landstreicher, Prostituierte, Zuhälter und Fürsorgeemppfänger in der Korrektions- und Landarmenanstalt Breitenau (1874–1949) (Kassel: Gesamthochschule Kassel, Verein für hessische Geschichte und Landeskunde e.V, 1992)Google Scholar
  35. Andrea Rudolph, Die Kooperation von Strafrecht und Sozialhilferecht bei der Disziplinierung von Armen mittels Arbeit. Vom Arbeitshaus bis zur gemeinnützigen Arbeit (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1995).Google Scholar
  36. 32.
    Hugo Appelius, Die Behandlung jugendlicher Verbrecher und verwahrloster Kinder (Berlin: J. Guttentag, 1892), 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michael Voss, Jugend ohne Rechte: Entwicklung des Jugendstrafrechts (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1986).Google Scholar
  38. 35.
    For an extended discussion of health policy and Bevölkerungspolitik, see Annette Timm, “The Legacy of Bevölkerungspolitik: Venereal Disease Control and Marriage Counseling in Post-WWII Berlin,” Canadian Journal of History XVIII (August 1998): 173–214.Google Scholar
  39. 36.
    Dagmar Herzog, “Desperately Seeking Normality. Sex and Marriage in the Wake of War,” in Life After Death: Approaches to a Culture and Social History of Europe During the 1940s and 1950s, ed. Richard Bessel and Dirk Schumann (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 161–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 37.
    In the GDR, see D. Müller-Hegemann, Moderne Nervosität (Berlin: Volk & Gesundheit, 1959)Google Scholar
  41. W. Bretschneider, Sexuell aufklären rechtzeitig und richtig (Leipzig, Jena: Urania, 1956). In the FRG, see Hans Heinrich Muchow, Sexualreife und Sozialstruktur der Jugend (Reinbeck bei Hamburg, 1959), 27–70Google Scholar
  42. Kurt Saller, Zivilisation und Sexualität (Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag, 1956).Google Scholar
  43. 40.
    Brigitte Oleschinski, Gedenkstätte Plötzensee (Berlin: Gedenkstätte Deutscher Widerstand, 1995)Google Scholar
  44. Thomas Waltenbacher: Zentrale Hinrichtungsstätten: Der Vollzug der Todesstrafe in Deutschland von 1937–1945. Scharfrichter im Dritten Reich. (Berlin: Zwilling-Berlin, 2008).Google Scholar
  45. 41.
    See Richard Bessel, Germany 1945: From War to Peace (New York: HarperCollins, 2009)Google Scholar
  46. Atina Grossmann, “Defeated Germans and Surviving Jews: Gendered Encounters in everyday life in U.S. Occupied Germany, 1945–49,” in German History From the Margins, ed. Neil Gregor, Nils Roemer, and Mark Roseman (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  47. 43.
    Karl Bader, Soziologie der Deutschen Nachkriegskriminalität (Tübingen: J. C. B Mohr, 1949), 155, 149.Google Scholar
  48. 44.
    Alexander Mitscherlich, “Verwahrlosung der Jugend,” Tagesspiegel November 27, 1947. On the place of psychoanalysis under the Nazis and in the early postwar period, see Daniel Pick, “In Pursuit of the Nazi Mind? The Development of Psychoanalysis in the Allied Struggle Against Germany,” Psychoanalysis and History 11 (2009): 137–57 and Martin Dehli, “Shap-ing History: Alexander Mitscherlich and German Psychoanalysis after 1945,” Psychoanalysis and History 11 (2009): 57–74.Google Scholar
  49. 45.
    For an overview of the postwar reorganizaiton of youth criminal policy see Jörg Wolff, Margreth Egelkamp, Tobias Mulot, and Michael Gassert, Das Jugendstrafrecht zwischen Nationalsozialismus und Demokratie: Die Rückkehr der Normalität (Baden Baden: Nomos, 1997). With the founding of the German Democratic Republic in October 1949, these laws were finally rewritten along with a host of other policy directives aimed at purging the remnants of Nazi social engineering while streamlining youth support for state socialism.Google Scholar
  50. 46.
    Matthias Etzel, Die Aufhebung von nationalsozialistischen Gesetzen durch den Alliierten Kontrolrat (1945–48). (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1992), 164Google Scholar
  51. Eva Schumann, ed., Kontinuitäten und Zäsuren: Rechtswissenschaft und Justiz im “Dritten Reich” und in der Nachkriegszeit (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2008). See also the discussion entitled “Die Jugendstrafe unbestimmter Dauer” from the Amstgericht Heinen, Bonn in Monatschrift für Deutsches Recht 8.5 (May 1954): 264–6.Google Scholar
  52. 47.
    Thomas Irmer, Kaspar Nürnberg, und Barbara Reischl, “Das Städtische Arbeits- und Bewahrungshaus Rummelsburg in Berlin-Lichtenberg, Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines vergessenen Ortes der Verfolgung von ‘Asozialen’ in der NS-Zeit,” Gedenkstättenrundbrief 144.8 (2008): 22–3.Google Scholar
  53. 55.
    For a detailed discussion of the process of policing homosexual youth, see Jennifer V. Evans, “Bahnhof Boys: Promiscuity and the Policing of Sexual Comportment in Post-Nazi Berlin,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 12.4 (October 2003): 605–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 57.
    For more information on the laws governing disease transmission and suspected prostitution, see Uta Falck, VEB Bordell: Prostitution in der DDR (Berlin: Ch. Links Verlag, 1998)Google Scholar
  55. Annette Timm, “Guarding the Health of Worker Families in the GDR: Socialist Health Care, Bevölkerungspolitik, and Marriage Counselling, 1945–72,” in Arbeiter in der SBZ-DDR, ed. Peter Hübner and Klaus Tenfelde (Essen: Klartext, 1999), 463–95.Google Scholar
  56. 60.
    In Berlin in the first few years after capitulation, property crimes had risen 885 percent from the 1937 figures. See Richard Bessel, “Grenzen des Polizeistaates. Polizei und Gesellschaft in der SBZ und frühen DDR, 1945–1953,” in Die Grenzen der Diktatur: Staat und Gesellschaft in der DDR, ed. Richard Bessel and Ralph Jessen (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1996), 225. But violent crime also climbed in the postwar period. For statistics governing violent criminal infractions see LAB C Rep. 303/9 Polizeipräsident in Berlin 1945–48, No. 246 Statistiken der Kriminalpolizei 1945–48.Google Scholar
  57. 61.
    Hermann Glaser, Kleine Kulturgeschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Bonn: Carl Hanser 1991), 72–3.Google Scholar
  58. 66.
    Martha Vicinus, “Distance and Desire: English Boarding-School Friendships,” Signs 9.4 (1984): 600–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Regina Kunzel, Criminal Intimacy: Prison and the Uneven History of Modern American Sexuality (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  60. 67.
    Ernst Seelig, Lehrbuch der Kriminologie (Dusseldorf: Fachverlag Dr. N. Stoytscheff, 1951), 48. Selig suggests that “shirking career criminals take to a life of crime while teens, often remarking later in life that they couldn’t find work as young adults. In reformatories (homes for wayward youth or similar institutions) they aren’t cured, but instead learn from more established career criminals and refine their skills… once on the outside they continue to seek out established criminals and form small bands of grifters.” Interestingly, Selig suggests that no form of state intervention will prevent these youths from re-offending. However, he notes that in a few cases marriage brings about resocialization.Google Scholar
  61. 76.
    Robert G. Moeller, “Private Acts, Public Anxieties, and the Fight to Decriminalize Male Homosexuality in the Federal Republic of Germany,” Feminist Studies 36.3 (Fall 2010): 528–52Google Scholar
  62. Dagmar Herzog, Sex After Fascism: Memory and Morality in Twentieth-Century Germany (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005), especially chapter 2, “The Fragility of Heterosexuality.”Google Scholar
  63. 77.
    Hans Giese, “Die politische Rolle der Frage nach dem Wesen der menschlichen Sexualität,” Beiträge der Sexualforschung 1.1 (1952): 25.Google Scholar
  64. Gabi Dolff-Bonekämper and Franziska Schmidt, Das Hansaviertel: Internationale Nachkriegsmoderne in Berlin (Berlin: Verlag Bauwesen, 1999)Google Scholar
  65. 86.
    In the Treuenbrietzen facility, boys lived in small groups with a single caseworker in deliberately designed family-like environments. See Horning, “Die Arbeit des Jugendwerkhofes Treuenbrietzen an straffällig gewordenen und erziehungsgefährdeten Jugendlichen,” in Neue Justiz 3.3 (1949): 38–9.Google Scholar
  66. 87.
    For an example from Saxony, see the article by an Amtsgericht judge in Aue, “Erfahrungen mit dem produktiven Arbeitsansatz Strafgefangener,” Neue Justiz 2.4 (1950): 57–8.Google Scholar
  67. 90.
    The persistence of traditional gender roles despite the language of equality has been emphasized in a variety of studies. For an example, see Ina Merkel, “Leitbilder und Lebensweisen von Frauen in der DDR,” in Sozialgeschichte der DDR, ed. Hartmut Kaelble, Jürgen Kocka, and Hartmut Zwahr (Stuttgart: Klett Cotta, 1994).Google Scholar
  68. 94.
    Dr. Schimmelpfeng, “Die Betreuung von Kindern, Jugendlichen und Heranwachsenden in Heimen und Anstalten,” in Bekämpfung der Jugendkrimianlität. Arbeitstagung im Bundeskriminalamt Wiesbaden vom 1. November bis 6. November über die Jugendlichen und Heranwachsenden (Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt, 1955), 231.Google Scholar
  69. 98.
    Hans Eyferth, Gefährdete Jugend. Erziehungshilfe bei Fehlentwicklung (Hannover: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsanstalt K.G, 1950), 4.Google Scholar
  70. 103.
    See Uta Poiger, “Rock ‘n’ roll, Kalter Krieg und deutsche Identität,” in Amerikanisierung und Sowjetisierung in Deutschland 1945–1970, ed. Konrad H. Jarausch, Siegrist (Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, 1997), 275–89, in addition to her article “A New, ‘Western’ Hero? Reconstructing German Masculinity in the 1950s,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 24.1 (1998): 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 107.
    This argument was made in reference to West Germany in Robert Moeller, Protecting Motherhood: Women and the Family in the Politics of Postwar Germany (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  72. 108.
    Makarenko was highly regarded among pedagogues and his writings were frequently cited in the documents. He represents the Soviet state’s efforts to deal with the growing problem, after 1917, of homeless children and juvenile crime. For one of his key contributions to juvenile delinquency and Soviet childrearing, see A. S. Makarenko, Problems of Soviet School Education (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1965). Makarenko was especially lauded for his work with the besprizornyi or delinquents of the early postrevolutionary era. Wendy Goldman suggests that in Soviet Russia, by 1924, the state viewed young criminals as a distinct subculture that was “stubbornly entrenched and inimical to the ideals of the state.” In order to deal with the problem posed by young offenders, the state sought new ways to channel their energy toward respect for the family and key social institutions. See Wendy Z. Goldman, Women, the State, and Revolution: Soviet Family Policy and Social Life, 1917–36 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 89. For additional information on the problem of child welfare and juvenile delinquency in post-1917 Soviet Russia, see Alan M. Ball, And Now My Soul Is Hardened: Abandoned Children in Soviet Russia, 1918–1930 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994)Google Scholar
  73. Laurie Bernstein, “Fostering the Next Generation of Socialists: Patronirovanie in the Fledgling Soviet State,” Journal of Family History 26.1 (January 2001): 66–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Margaret K. Stolee, “Homeless Children in the USSR, 1917–1957,” Soviet Studies 40.1 (1988)Google Scholar
  75. Jennie A. Stevens, “Children of the Revolution: Soviet Russia’s Homeless Children (Besprizorniki) in the 1920s,” Russian History/Histoire Russe 9, pts 2–3 (1982): 250–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 116.
    See Konrad H. Jarausch, “Care and Coercion: The GDR as Welfare Dictatorship,” in Dictatorship as Experience: Towards a Socio-Cultural History of the GDR, ed. Konrad Jarausch (New York: Berghahn Press, 1999), 59.Google Scholar
  77. 117.
    Günter Grau, “Return of the Past: The Policy of the SED and the Laws Against Homosexuality in Eastern Germany between 1946 and 1968,” Journal of Homosexuality 37.4 (1999): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jennifer V. Evans 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer V. Evans

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations