The Train Station

  • Jennifer V. Evans
Part of the Genders and Sexualities in History book series (GSX)


“Always in a good mood, always a boost.” That was how Gustav Spielberg characterized Frau Kupke, a metropolitan train station attendant with the Berlin Transportation Authority (BVG). Among the feuilletonists, physicians, technicians, district majors, and rubble women he approached for perspectives on the fall of Berlin, Frau Kupke’s story stood out. No one had managed to capture the collective trauma of capitulation as vividly as she had, and in so few words. Faithfully attending her post in the Mehringdamm underground station in Kreuzberg, every 2½ minutes she warned the city’s frustrated and overburdened travelers to mind the doors as the trains hurtled in and out of the station. Steeped in steely optimism despite the drudgery of the day, Kupke made certain she held tightly to the schedule, all the while thankful not to be “stuck at some dead train station, where the trains come every 20 minutes.” She needed “this tempo, this bustle” after her lengthy illness, brought on by what she termed rather euphemistically as the “excitement of the last days of the war.” Her embrace of the orderly chaos was remarkable given the scope of her personal struggles. Less than a year ago, united with her husband and two small children, she felt certain she could endure the transition from war to peace.


Train Station Youth Service Transit Space Train Travel Sexual Mores 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    Wolfgang Schivelbusch, The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the 19th Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986) and Todd Presner, Mobile Modernity: Germans, Jews, Trains (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  2. Peter Bailey, “Adventures in Space. Victorian Railway Erotics or Taking Alienation For a Ride,” Journal of Victorian Culture 9.1 (April 2004): 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ralph Herrington, “Rail-way Journey and Crises of Modernity,” Pathologies of Travel (Amsterdam: Rodophi, 2000), 229–60Google Scholar
  4. Simone Gigliotti, A Holocaust in Transit: Trains, Captivity, Witness (New York: Berghahn Books, 2010) and “‘Cattle Car Complexes’: A Correspondence with Historical Captivity and Post-Holocaust Witnesses,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 20.2 (2006): 256–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    Michel Foucault, “Of Other Spaces,” Diacritics 16.1 (Spring 1987): 24.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Marian Aguiar, “Making Modernity: Inside the Technological Space of the Railway,” Cultural Critique 68 (Winter 2008): 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 10.
    Gayle Letherby and Gillian Reynolds, Train Tracks: Work, Play, and Politics on the Railways (New York: Berg, 2005), 8.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    Pamela E. Swett, “Political Networks, Rail Networks: Public Transportation and Neighbourhood Radicalism in Weimar Berlin,” in The City and the Railway in Europe, ed. Ralf Roth and Marie Noelle Polino (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003), 222–3.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    Brian Ladd, The Ghosts of Berlin: Confronting German History in the Urban Landscape (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 13.
    Albert Speer as cited in Jeffrey Richards and John M. MacKenzie, The Railway Station: A Social History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), 116.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Barbara Lovenheim, Survival in the Shadows: Seven Jews Hidden in Hitler’s Berlin (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2002), 151.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    Ursula von Kardorff, Berliner Aufzeichnungen Aus den Jahren 1942–45 (Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1962), 193.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    Birthe Kundrus, “Forbidden Company: Romantic Relationships between Germans and Foreigners, 1939 to 1945,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 11.1/2 (January-April 2002): 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 18.
    Jeanne Mammen in Hans-Dieter Schäfer, Berlin im Zweiten Weltkrieg: Der Untergang der Reichshauptstadt in Augenzeugenberichten (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1985), 239.Google Scholar
  15. 20.
    Helmut Altner, Berlin Dance of Death (Staplehurst: Spellmount, 2002), 152.Google Scholar
  16. 21.
    Hans Dieter Schäfer, Berlin im Zweiten Weltkrieg: Der Untergang der Reichshauptstadt in Augenzeugenberichten (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1985), 248.Google Scholar
  17. 22.
    Heinz Knobloch, Angehaltener Bahnhof: Fantasiestücke, Spaziergänge in Berlin. East Berlin: Das Arsenal, 1984), 60.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    Cited in Anke Pinkert, Film and Memory in East Germany (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008), 100.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    Willi Besener and Heinrich Manier, “Im Unterleib von Berlin,” in Bomben, Trümmer, Lucky Strikes: Die Stunde Null in bisher unbekannten Manuskripten, ed. Peter Kruse (Berlin: Wolf Jobst Siedler, 2004), 117.Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    Anke Pinkert, “Silent Mothers: Air Wars as Intimate Memory — Rotation,” in Film and Memory in East Germany (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008), 90–107.Google Scholar
  21. 27.
    Kracauer’s fascination is cited in Peter Mugay, Die Friedrichstrasse (Berlin: Ch. Links Verlag, 1991), 86.Google Scholar
  22. Ewan Butler, City Divided 1955 (New York: Praeger, 1955), 96.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    Wolfgang Schivelbusch, The Culture of Defeat: On National Trauma, Mourning, and Recovery (New York: Metropolitan Books, 2003), 277.Google Scholar
  24. 30.
    Jörn Donner, Report from Berlin (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1961), 57.Google Scholar
  25. 31.
    Army Times, Berlin: The City That Would Not Die (New York: Dodd, Mead and Company, 1968), 22.Google Scholar
  26. 32.
    John J. Maginnis, Military Government Journal: Normandy to Berlin (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1971), 258.Google Scholar
  27. 34.
    Landrum Bolling, “Zone of Silence,” in Arthur Settel, This Is Germany: A Report on Post War Germany by 21 Newspaper Correspondents (New York: William Sloane Associates, 1950), 375.Google Scholar
  28. 35.
    Richard Brett-Smith, Berlin ‘45: The Grey City (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1967), 119.Google Scholar
  29. 37.
    Margret Boveri, Tage des Uberlebens. Berlin 1945. (Munich: SeriePiper, 1985), 125.Google Scholar
  30. 38.
    Claudia Schoppmann and Angela Martin, eds., Ich fürchte die Menschen mehr als die Bomben: Aus den Tagebüchern von drei Berliner Frauen 1938–1946. (Berlin: Metropol Verlag, 1996), 139.Google Scholar
  31. 40.
    Denis Martin, “March of Millions,” in Arthur Settel, This Is Germany (New York: Sloane, 1950), 216–17.Google Scholar
  32. 41.
    Kristen Semmens, Seeing Hitler’s Germany: Tourism in the Third Reich (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 42.
    Peter Neumann, “Berlins vergessene Bahnhöfe,” Berliner Zeitung March 4, 2004.Google Scholar
  34. 43.
    Walter Benjamin, Berlin Childhood Around 1900. (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2006), 35.Google Scholar
  35. 45.
    Wilfred Byford-Jones, Berlin Twilight (New York: Hutchison Press, 1947), 49.Google Scholar
  36. 46.
    Dagmar Barnouw, Germany 1945: Views of War and Violence (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996), 156–61.Google Scholar
  37. 47.
    Henry Ries, Berlin Photographien, 1946–1949 (Berlin: Nicolaische Verlagsbuchhandlung Beuermann, 1998), 83.Google Scholar
  38. 49.
    Erika Brüning as cited in Walter Schulze and Rolf Schneider, Heimkehr ins Leben. Berlin 1945–1960 (Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag, 2005), 100.Google Scholar
  39. 50.
    See Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001). Here too see Presner, Mobile Modernity.Google Scholar
  40. 54.
    Massimo Perinelli, Fluchtlinien des Neorealismus: Der organlose Körper der italienischen Nachkriegszeit 1943–1949 (Bielefeld: Transcript, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 55.
    Friedrich Luft, Blick über den Zaun: Tagesblätter (Berlin: Transit Buchverlag, 1999), 7.Google Scholar
  42. 57.
    Ralph Herrington, “The Railway Journey and the Neuroses of Modernity,” in Railway Journey and the Crises of Modernity, ed. Richard Wrigley and George Revill (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2000), 229.Google Scholar
  43. 59.
    Bettine Hitzer, Im Netz der Liebe: Die Protestantische Kirche und ihre Zuwanderer in der Metropole Berlin, 1849–1917 (Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 2006)Google Scholar
  44. Astrid Kirchhof, “Gefährdete Frauen und ‘Warnende’ Männer. Fürsorge am Bahnhof im Berlin der Kaiserzeit,” Informationen zur Modernen Stadtgeschichte (2004) 1: 38–52Google Scholar
  45. Warren Rosenblum, Beyond the Prison Gates: Punishment & Welfare in Germany, 1850–1933 (University of North Carolina Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  46. 60.
    Burghard Ciesla, “‘Uber alle Sektorengrenzen hinweg…’ Die Deutsche Reichsbahn und die Berlinkrisen (1945–1958),” in Stebern für Berlin? Die Berliner Krisen 1948:1958, ed. Burghard Ciesla, Michael Lemki, and Thomas Lindenberger (Berlin: Metropol Verlag, 2000), 133–52Google Scholar
  47. Rudolf Heym, Das Buch der Deutschen Reichsbahn (Munich: Gera Mond Verlag, 2003)Google Scholar
  48. Erich Preuß, Der Reichsbahn-Report (Stuttgart: transpress Verlag, 2001). In an example of the absurdity of Cold War governance, the underground network was run by the West. See Patrick Major, Behind the Berlin Wall (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 28.Google Scholar
  49. 62.
    Karl Bader, Soziologie der Deutschen Nachkriegskriminalität (Tübingen: JCB Mohr, 1949)Google Scholar
  50. Hilde Thurnwald, Gegenwartsprobleme Berliner Familien: Eine soziologische Untersuchung an 498 Familien (Berlin: Weidmann, 1948).Google Scholar
  51. 63.
    Atina Grossmann makes this point eloquently in her article on the rape of German women by Soviet soldiers. See “A Question of Silence: The Rape of German Women by Occupation Soldiers,” October 72 (Spring 1995): 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 64.
    See Peter von Rönn’s recent article for a larger discussion of youth corruptibility in the Nazi era. Peter von Rönn, “Politische und psychiatrische Homosexualitäts-Konstruktionen im NS-Staat,” Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung 11 (1998): 220–60. Special thanks to Dagmar Herzog for this reference.Google Scholar
  53. 65.
    Many people who have examined the problem of incarceration have confined their attention to either the Nazi or the postwar period. Some important contributions in the German literature include: Polizei: Vom Zwangsverhältnis zur Zweckehe? ed. Jens Dobler (Berlin: Verlag rosa Winkel, 1996)Google Scholar
  54. Rainer Hoffschildt, Die Verfolgung der Homosexuellen in der NS-Zeit: Zahlen und Schicksale aus Norddeutschland (Berlin: Verlag rosa Winkel, 1999)Google Scholar
  55. Burkhard Jellonnek, Homosexuelle unter dem Hakenkreuz. Die Verfolgung der Homosexuellen im Dritten Reich (Paderborn: Schöningh, 1990)Google Scholar
  56. Rönn, “Politische und psychiatrische Homosexualitäts-Konstruktionen im NS-Staat”;Claudia Schoppmann, Nationalsozialistische Sexualpolitik und weibliche Homosexualität (Pfaffenweiler, 1991)Google Scholar
  57. Claudia Schoppmann, Verbotene Verhältnisse (Berlin: Querverlag, 1999); “…wegen Vergehen nach § 175 verhaftet”. Die Verfolgung der Düsseldorfer Homosexuellen während des Nationalsozialismus, ed. Frank Sparing (Mahn- und Gedenkstätte Düsseldorf: Grupello, 1997)Google Scholar
  58. Hans-Georg Stürmke, Homosexuelle in Deutschland: Eine politische Geschichte (Munich, 1989). Recent examples from the postwar period include: Burckhardt Riechers, “Freundschaft und Anständigkeit: Leitbilder im Selbstverständnis männlicher Homosexueller in der frühen Bundesrepublik,” Invertito — Jahrbuch für die Geschichte der Homosexualitäten (1999): 12–46Google Scholar
  59. Kristof Balser, Mario Kramp, Jürgen Müller, and Joanna Gotzmann, Himmel und Hölle: Das Leben der Kölner Homosexuellen, 1945–69 (Cologne: Emons, 1994); and the essays in “Wegen der zu erwartenden hohen Strafe…,” Homosexuellenverfolgung in Berlin 1933–1945, ed. Andreas Pretzel and Gabriele Roßbach (Berlin: Sponsored by the Kulturring in Berlin e. V, 2000).Google Scholar
  60. 66.
    In recent years, many important studies have emerged that document transgressive sexuality in the urban milieu. Some key examples of the city’s role in fostering discourses of belonging and the emergence of subcultural identification include George Chauncey’s Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World (New York: Basic Books, 1994)Google Scholar
  61. Dan Healey, Homosexual Desire in Revolutionary Russia: The Regulation of Sexual and Gender Dissent (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Steven Maynard, “Through a Hole in the Lavatory Wall: Homosexual Subcultures, Police Surveillance, and the Dialectics of Discovery, Toronto, 1890–1930,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 5 (1994): 207–42Google Scholar
  63. Frank Mort, “Mapping Sexual London: The Wolfenden Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution, 1954–57,” New Formations 37 (Spring 1999): 92–113Google Scholar
  64. Mark Stein, City of Sisterly and Brotherly Loves: Gay and Lesbian Philadelphia, 1945–72 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  65. 68.
    For an example from the Weimar period, see John Henry Mackay’s famous account of a callboy’s life in the 1920s in Der Puppenjunge, reprint (Berlin: Verlag rosa Winkel, 1999). In English as The Hustler (Boston: Alyson, 1985).Google Scholar
  66. 70.
    Henning Bech, When Men Meet: Homosexuality and Modernity (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  67. 71.
    This link between bestiality and homosexuality has been researched in the Swedish context by Jens Rydstrom. See his article “‘Sodomitical Sins are Threefold’: Typologies of Bestiality, Masturbation, and Homosexuality in Sweden, 1880–1950,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 9 (2000): 240–76. For early histories of the regulation of illicit sex and German masculinity, see Martin Dinges, ed., Hausväter, Priester, Kastraten: zur Konstruktion von Männlichkeit in Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998)Google Scholar
  68. Ulrike Gleixner, “Das Mensch” und “Der Kerl.” Die Konstruktion von Geschlecht in Unzuchtsverfahren der frühen Neuzeit (1700–1760) (New York: Campus Verlag, 1994)Google Scholar
  69. Isabel V. Hull, Sexuality, State, and Civil Society in Germany, 1700–1815 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
  70. 72.
    Edward Ross Dickinson, “Policing Sex in Germany, 1882–1982. A Preliminary Statistical Analysis,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 6.2 (2007): 268.Google Scholar
  71. 73.
    Jens Dobler, Zwischen Duldungspolitik und Verbrechensbekämpfung. Homosexuellenverfolgung durch die Berliner Polizei von 1848 bis 1933 (Berlin: Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft, 2008)Google Scholar
  72. Martin Lücke, Männlichkeit in Unordnung: Homosexualität und männliche Prostitution in Kaiserreich und Weimarer Republik (Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2008).Google Scholar
  73. 74.
    Florence Tamagne and Gert Hekma both argue that the 1930s witnessed a Europe-wide increase in intolerance vis-à-vis homosexuals. See Florence Tamagne, Histoire de l’homosexualité en Europe (Paris, 2000) and Gert Hekma, “Same-sex Relations among Men in Europe, 1700–1990,” in Sexual Cultures in Europe, Vol. 2: Themes in Sexuality, ed. Franz Eder, Lesley Hall, and Gert Hekma (Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 1999), 79–103.Google Scholar
  74. Harry Oosterhuis, “Male Bonding and Homosexuality in Nazi Germany,” Journal of Homosexuality 22.1 (1991): 242–62Google Scholar
  75. Harry Oosterhuis, “Medicine, Male Bonding, and Homosexuality in Nazi Germany,” Journal of Contemporary History (Spring 1997): 187–205Google Scholar
  76. Robert Moeller, “The Homosexual Man is a ‘Man,’ the Homosexual Woman Is a ‘Woman’: Sex, Society, and the Law in Postwar West Germany,” in West Germany under Construction, ed. Robert G. Moeller (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995), 257Google Scholar
  77. Günter Grau, Homosexualität in der NS-Zeit (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Verlag, 1993).Google Scholar
  78. Eleanor Hancock, “‘Only the Real, the True, the Masculine Held its Value’: Ernst Röhm, Masculinity, and Male Homosexuality,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 8 (1998): 616–41.Google Scholar
  79. 78.
    Jürgen Baumann, Paragraph 175: Über die Möglichkeit einfache, die nichtjugendgefährdende und nicht öffentliche Homosexualität unter Erwachsenen straffrei zu lassen (Berlin: Luchterhand, 1968), 48–9. This change in legislation was immediately felt in terms of the number of men prosecuted under the new variant of the paragraph. Baumann gives figures which suggest that of the 41,116 Germans convicted of violating laws protecting morality (Sittlichkeitsdelikte) between 1931 and 1933, fully 2319 were prosecuted against Paragraph 175. In the two years before World War II, the numbers increase dramatically to 24,447 Paragraph 175 infractions out of a total of 65,155 Sittlichkeitsdelikte. See Baumann, 61 as quoted in Moeller, “The Homosexual Man is a ‘Man,’ “259.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    On the issue of prison sentences, see Rainer Hoffschildt, “Zuchthäuser,” in Die Verfolgung der Homosexuellen in der NS-Zeit: Zahlen und Schicksale aus Norddeutschland (Berlin: Verlag rosa Winkel, 1999), 143–76. Efforts are underway to catalogue the exact number of men who perished in the camps, as well as those who fell victim to Nazi jurisprudence. Rainer Hoffschildt is currently constructing a database of names, while Andreas Pretzel is assembling a book of the dead that seeks to enumerate the number of men who may be traced through the Berlin police and court records as having died due to Nazi persecution. This is an especially difficult task, given the fact that many men had repeat offences; where access is granted, case files are often incomplete.Google Scholar
  81. 83.
    Perhaps these attitudes in the East help explain why from 1946 until 1949 only 129 judgments were passed down on Paragraph 175. Günter Grau has made this point in two articles, both dealing with the fractious debate over the possible decriminalization of homosexuality in the GDR. See Günter Grau, “Return of the Past: The Policy of the SED and the Laws Against Homosexuality in Eastern Germany between 1946 and 1968,” Journal of Homosexuality 37 (1999): 1–21 and “Im Auftrag der Partei: Versuch einer Reform der strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen zur Homosexualität in der DDR 1952,” Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung 9 (1996): 109–29, which includes a transcript of the deliberations of the legal reform committee from the Bundesarchiv-Lichterfelde.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 84.
    See Brandstetter, StPO mit Nebengesetzen (Berlin, 1951), 273.Google Scholar
  83. Mario Kramp and Martin Sölle, “§175 — Restauration und Reform in der Bundesrepublik,” in “Himmel und Hölle”: Das Leben der Kölner Homosexuellen 1945–69, ed. Kristof Balser, Mario Kramp, Jürgen Müller, and Joanna Gotzmann (Cologne, 2000), 125.Google Scholar
  84. 85.
    Kammergericht Berlin, “Urteil v. 21.2.1950,” Neue Justiz 4 (1950): 129.Google Scholar
  85. 87.
    On the regulation of homosexuality in West and East Germany, see Robert G. Moeller, “Private Acts, Public Anxieties, and the Fight to Decriminalize Male Homosexuality in the Federal Republic of Germany,” Feminist Studies 36.3 (Fall 2010): 528–52 and Jennifer V. Evans, “Decriminalization, Seduction, and ‘Unnatural Desire’ in the German Democratic Republic,” Feminist Studies 36.3 (Fall 2010): 553–77.Google Scholar
  86. 88.
    Klaus Ulrich Klemens, Die kriminelle Belastung der männlichen Prostituierten: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Rückfallsprognose (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1967), 15.Google Scholar
  87. 93.
    Landesarchiv Berlin (hereafter referred to as LAB) B Rep. 013 Senatverwaltung für Jugend und Familie, Acc. 1052, No. 39. Case number (507) Jug Kms 65/51 and 2Ju Kms 8/51. For an interesting pre-1918 history of the courthouse and some of its famous cases, see Benjamin Hett, Death in the Tiergarten: Murder and Criminal Justice in the Kaiserzeit (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
  88. 95.
    On female prostitution, see Abraham Flexner, Prostitution in Europe (1914; New York: Century, 1920)Google Scholar
  89. Richard J. Evans, “Prostitution, State, and Society in Imperial Germany,” Past & Present 70 (1976): 106–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Regina Schulte, Sperrbezirke: Tugendhaftigkeit und Prostitution in der bürgerlichen Welt (Frankfurt: Syndikat, 1984)Google Scholar
  91. Julia Roos, “Backlash against Prostitutes’ Rights: Origins and Dynamics of Nazi Prostitution Policies,” in Sexuality and German Fascism, ed. Dagmar Herzog (New York: Berghahn, 2005).Google Scholar
  92. 96.
    Richard Bessel, Germany 1945: From War to Peace (New York: HarperCollins, 2009), 225.Google Scholar
  93. 98.
    See Jeffrey Weeks, The World We Have Won: The Remaking of Erotic and Intimate Life (New York: Routledge Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  94. 99.
    Elizabeth D. Heineman, “The Hour of The Woman: Memories of Germany’s ‘Crisis Years’ and West German National Identity, ‘American Historical Review 101 (April 1996): 354–96, in addition to her recent monograph, What Difference Does a Husband Make? Women and Marital Status in Nazi and Postwar Germany (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Maria Höhn, “Frau im Haus, Girl im Spiegel: Discourse on Women in the Interregnum Period of 1945–1949 and the Question of German Identity,” Central European History 26 (Winter 1993): 57–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Petra Goedde, “From Villains to Victims: Fraternization and the Feminization of Germany, 1945–47,” Diplomatic History 23 (Winter 1999): 17Google Scholar
  97. John Willoughby, “The Sexual Behavior of American GIs During the Early Years of the Occupation of Germany,” Journal of Military History 62 (January 1998): 156Google Scholar
  98. Annemarie Tröger, “Between Rape and Prostitution: Survival Strategies and Possibilities of Liberation of Berlin Women in 1945–1948,” in Women in Culture and Politics: A Century of Change, ed. Judith Friedlander, Alice Kessler-Harris, and Carol Smith-Rosenberg (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  99. 100.
    Frank Biess, “Survivors of Totalitarianism: Returning POWs and the Reconstruction of Masculine Citizenship in West Germany, 1945–55,” in Hanna Schissler, The Miracle Years: A Cultural History of West Germany, 1949–68 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 57–82Google Scholar
  100. Robert Moeller, “The Last Soldiers of the ‘Great War’ and Tales of Family Reunions in the Federal Republic of Germany,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 24.1 (1998): 129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Despite empirical evidence to the contrary, in 1959 Inspector Schramm of the Landeskriminalamt Berlin stated that in the immediate postwar period there were no callboys on the streets of Berlin. Only with the stabilization of the social and political situation, he argues, did hustlers reemerge onto the scene. See Ernst Schramm, “Das Strichjungenunwesen,” in Sittlichkeitsdelikte: Arbeitstagung im Bundeskriminalamt Wiesbaden vom 20. — 25.4.1959 über die Bekämpfung der Sittlichkeitsdelikte, ed. Bundeskriminalamt (Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt, 1959), 90. For examples from a different context, in this case early 1950s Cologne, see Michael Schön, “Einsatz für die Sittlichkeit: Kölner Polizei und Homosexuelle,” in “Himmel und Hölle”: Das Leben der Kölner Homosexuellen 1945–69, ed. Kristof Balser, Mario Kramp, Jürgen Müller, and Joanna Gotzmann (Cologne, 1999), 155–68.Google Scholar
  102. 110.
    Robert P. Stephens, Germans On Drugs: The Complications of Modernization in Hamburg (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  103. 111.
    Stefan Zweig, The World of Yesterday (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1964), 313.Google Scholar
  104. 112.
    Andreas Butter, Hans-Joachim Kirsche, and Erich Preuß, Berlin Ostkreuz — Die Drehscheibe des S-Bahn-Verkehrs (Munich: Geramond Verlag, 2000).Google Scholar
  105. 113.
    Barry Read, New York Hustlers: Masculinity and Sex in Modern America (Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  106. 115.
    Clayton J. Whisnant, “Styles of Masculinity in the West German Gay Scene,” Central European History 39 (2006): 359–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 126.
    See Herbert Tobias: Blicke und Begehren, 1928–1982 (Berlin: Berlinische Gallerie, 2008).Google Scholar
  108. 128.
    For a filmic version of the seduction motif, see Veit Harlan’s remake of the 1919 film of a similar name, for which Magnus Hirschfeld originally contributed the screenplay. The 1957 version, Anders als Du und Ich (§175), filmed under consultation with Hans Giese, sparked a national discussion of the quest to decriminalize Paragraph 175 in West Germany. The film was inherently controversial, due to both the subject matter and the director’s professional history as a filmmaker during the Nazi period; he was responsible for one of the worst anti-Semitic feature films, Jüd Suß. A spirited account of the film and the controversy that engulfed it may be found in Heide Fehrenbach, Cinema in Democratizing Germany: National Identity after Hitler (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1995), 174–7.Google Scholar
  109. 129.
    Botho Laserstein, Strichjunge Karl: Ein kriminalistischer Tatsachenbericht (Hamburg: Janssen Verlag, 1994), 37.Google Scholar
  110. 130.
    Laserstein, Strichjunge Karl, 54. Of course, the fear of solicitation and blackmail was intense during the Nazi period. In Hamburg, for example, members of the Hitler Youth served as decoys, pretending, as Stefan Micheler argues, “to offer sexual services in order to entrap men.” See Stefan Micheler, “Homophobic Propaganda and the Denunciation of Same-Sex-Desiring Men under National Socialism,” in Journal of the History of Sexuality 11 (2002): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 131.
    For a full-length study of blackmail, with an emphasis on the English and French contexts, see Angus McLaren, Sexual Blackmail: A Modern History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  112. 133.
    Court records from this period are difficult to work with, offering but a foggy window into the past. I wish to extend warm thanks to Herren Marx and Nanzka of the Amtsgericht Tiergarten, Berlin for arranging access to valuable case files not yet archived at the Landesarchiv Berlin. For a discussion of the role of courtroom dramas and the place of the law in crafting acceptable and aberrant identities during the Nazi period, see Patricia Szobar, “Telling Sexual Stories in the Nazi Courts of Law: Race Defilement in Germany, 1933 to 1945,” Journal of the History of Sexuality 11 (2002): 131–63. For a self-conscious study of the possibilities provided by court cases and their place in narrating gay history, see Steven Maynard, “‘Horrible Temptations’: Sex, Men, and Working-Class Youth in Urban Ontario, 1890–1935,” Canadian Historical Review 6 (1997): 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 138.
    Internist Dr. Kilian published the results of his research on the reintegration of returning soldiers into family life in a special edition of the Beiträge zur Sexualforschung. He found that between 10 and 20 percent of the soldiers had homosexual encounters while in captivity. See H. Kilian, “Das Wiedereinleben des Heimkehrers in Familie, Ehe und Beruf,” Beiträge zur Sexualforschung 11 (1957): 32–4. For a similar mention of homosexual “derailment” among POWs, see Otto Tschadek, “Die Aufgabe des Staates gegenüber dem Heimkehrer,” Beiträge zur Sexualforschung 11 (1957): 76–9. More recently, Frank Biess has uncovered this connection in his research on the reintegration of POWs into East and West German society. See Biess, “Survivors of Totalitarianism,” 57–82.Google Scholar
  114. 140.
    This was a common charge against returning soldiers, that psychological trauma had a profoundly gendered impact on their marital and social lives. See Svenja Golterman, Die Gesellschaft der Uberlebenden: Deutsche Kriegsheimkehrer und ihrer Gewalterfahrungen im Zweiten Weltkrieg (Munich: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 2009).Google Scholar
  115. 142.
    Again, see Gerhard Jörns, Der Jugendwerkhof im Jugendhilfesystem der DDR (Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag, 1995).Google Scholar
  116. 143.
    Michelle Mouton, From Nurturing the Nation to Purifying the Volk: Weimar and Nazi Family Policy 1918–45 (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jennifer V. Evans 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer V. Evans

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations