Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Humanism in Business Series ((HUBUS))

  • 1609 Accesses

Abstract

Aristotle has in recent years enjoyed much attention in business and management journals (Collins, 1987; Dyck and Kleysen, 2001; Solomon, 2004; Wijnberg, 2000). Whether in relation to total quality management (Schoengrund, 1996), knowledge management (Demarest, 1997), crisis management (Darling, 1994), networking (Schonsheck, 2000), in psychological literature on well- being (Waterman, 1990), or as a general reference point for business ethics scholars (for example, Fontrodona and Mele, 2002; Gimbel, 2005; Solomon, 1992; Solomon, 2004; Wijnberg, 2000), Aristotle’s philosophy enjoys enthusiastic attention in the business field. In order to understand the significance of this, it is imperative that we do not isolate the tenets of his business ethics from their wider philosophical context but, rather, explain the former by the latter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arena, C., Cause for Success: 10 Companies That Put Profit Second and Came in First, (Novato, CA: New World Library, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, Eudemian Ethics (EE), in W. Heinemann (ed.), Aristotle in 23 Volumes, Vol. 20, translated by H. Rackham, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (NE), translated by T. Irwin, (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: 1994, Rhetoric (Ret), translated by W. Rhys Roberts, D.C. Stevenson (ed.), The internet classics archives. http://classics.mit.edu/, Accessed on September 18, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, Parts of Animals (PA), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, Politics (Pol), translated by Benjamin Jowett, (eBooks@Adelaide, Adelaide, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballou, J.P. and B.A. Weisbrod, “Managerial Rewards and the Behavior of forprofit, Governmental, and Non- profit Organizations: Evidence from the Hospital Industry”, Journal of Public Economics 87(9–10) (2003) 1895–1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M. and B.J. Avolio, “Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture”, International Journal of Public Administration 17(3/4), (1994) 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J., C. Brocht and M. Spade- Aguilar, How Much is Enough?: Basic Family Budgets for Working Families, (Washington D.C.: Economic Policy Institute, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas- Diener, R., E. Diener and M. Tamir, “The Psychology of Subjective Wellbeing”, Daedalus 133(2) (2004) 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, P., Stewardship: Choosing Service over Self- interest (San Francisco: Berrett- Koehler Publishers, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. and A.K. Buchholtz, Business and Society – Ethics and Stakeholder Management (Mason, OH: South- Western, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B., “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons 34(4) (1991) 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B., “Corporate Social Responsibility – Evolution of a Definitional Construct”, Business & Society 38(3) (1999) 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. and S.B. Rodrigues, “Repairing the Breach of Trust in Corporate Governance”, Corporate Governance 12(2) (2004) 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D., “Aristotle and Business”, Journal of Business Ethics (6) (1987) 567–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, J.R., “Crisis Management in International Business”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 15(8) (1994) 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.H., F.D. Schoorman and T. Donaldson, “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management”, Academy of Management Review 22(1), (1997) 20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demarest, M., “Understanding Knowledge Management”, Long Range Planning 30(3) (1997) 321–322, 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demosthenes, I Olynthiacs, Philippics Minor Public Orations I- XVII and XX, (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library No. 238, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. and M.E.P. Seligman, “Beyond money: Toward and economy of wellbeing”, Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5(1) (2004) 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. and J.H. Davis, “Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns”, Australian Journal of Management 16(1) (1991) 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., “Editor’s Comments: Taking Ethics Seriously— A Mission Now More Possible”, Academy of Management Review 28 (3) (2003) 363–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, B. and R. Kleysen, “Aristotle’s Virtues and Management Thought: An Empirical Exploration of an Integrative Pedagogy”, Business Ethics Quarterly 11(4) (2001) 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R., “Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory”, Economic Journal 111, (July) (2001) 465–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontrodona, J. and D. Melé, “Philosophy as a Base for Management: An Aristotelian Integrative Proposal”, Philosophy of Management (formerly Reason in Practice) 2(2), (2002) 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, J.L., Happy People: What Happiness Is, Who Has It, and Why? (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freshfields, Bruckhaus and Deringer, A Legal Framework for the Integration of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Issues into Institutional Investment, (New York: United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., Modernity and Self – Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimbel, S., “Can Corporations Be Morally Responsible? Aristotle, Stakeholders and the Non- Sale of Hershey”, Philosophy of Management, (formerly Reason in Practice) 5(3) (2005), pp. 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., Capitalism at the Crossroads – The Unlimited Business Opportunities in Solving the World´s Most Difficult Problems, (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P., A. Lovins and H. Lovins:, Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution, (NY: Little, Brown & Co., 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., B. Neuijen, D.D. Ohayv and G. Sanders, “Measuring Organizational Cultures: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study across Twenty Cases” Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2) (1990) 286–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I. and J. Nelson, Profits with Principles- Seven Strategies for Delivering Value with Values, (New York: Currency Doubleday, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Function”, Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2) (2002) 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasmir, J., The Myth of Mondragon: Cooperatives, Politics, and Working- Class Life in a Basque Town, (New York: State University of New York Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T. and A.C. Ahuvia, “Materialistic Values and Well- being in Business Students”, European Journal of Social Psychology 32(1) (2002) 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, P., Politik und Ökonomie bei Aristoteles, (Tuebingen: Mohr, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R., “Does money buy happiness?”, The Public Interest 113(Fall) (1993) 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langholm, O., Price and Value in the Aristotelian Tradition: A Study in Scholastic Sources (Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. and N. Nohria, Driven: How Human Nature Shapes Our Choices (San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.: 2007, Being Human – A Renewed Darwinian Theory of Human Behavior, www.prlawrence.com. Accessed on June 15, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Happiness - Lessons from a New Science, (London: Penguin Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, S.T., The Archeology of Economic Ideas. The Classical Greek Tradition, (Durham: Duke University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., Making Happy People, (London: Fourth Estate, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel, “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective” Academy of Management Review, 26(1), (2001) 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, S., Aristotle’s Economic Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherji, P.N. and C. Sengupta, Indigeneity and Universality in Social Science: A South Asian Response, (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M.L. and J. Kraus, “The Association between Corporate Social- Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost”, Journal of Business Ethics 15(3) (1996) 321–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. and M. Kramer, “Strategy and Society: The Link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility”, Harvard Business Review, December (2006) 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Savitz, A.W. and K. Weber, The Triple Bottom Line, (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E.H., Organizational Culture and Leadership: A Dynamic View, (San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A.G. and G. Palazzo, “Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Social Responsibility: Business and Society seen from a Habermasian Perspective”, Academy of Management Review 32(4) (2007) 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoengrund, C., “Aristotle and Total Quality Management”, Total Quality Management 7(1) (1996) 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonsheck, J., “Business Friends: Aristotle, Kant and other Management Theorists on the Practice of Networking”, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(4) (2000) 897–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J., History of Economic Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.C., “Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?”, California Management Review 45(4) (2003) 52–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C., Ethics and Excellence: Co- operation and Integrity in Business, (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C., “Aristotle, Ethics and Business Organizations”, Organization Studies 25(6) (2004) 1021–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soudek, J., “Aristotle’s Theory of Exchange. An Inquiry into the Origin of the Economic Analysis”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (96) (1952) 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzeck, H. and Hansen, E.G., Stakeholder Governance – How do stakeholders influence corporate decision- making?, in: Corporate Governance (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom, S., “Businesses Try to Make Money and Save the World”, New York Times, May 6, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, A.K. and A.C. Inkpen, “The Corporate Objective Revisited”, Organization Science 15(3) (2004) 350–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, T., “Trust, Reputation and Corporate Accountability to Stakeholders”, Business Ethics: A European Review 10(1) (2001) 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A.S., “The Relevance of Aristotle’s Conception of Eudaimonia for the Psychological Study of Happiness”, Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 10 (1990) 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wijnberg, N.M., “Normative Stakeholder Theory and Aristotle: The Link Between Ethics and Politics”, Journal of Business Ethics (25) (2000) 329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Claus Dierksmeier and Michael Pirson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dierksmeier, C., Pirson, M. (2011). Aristotle’s Economic Ethics. In: Dierksmeier, C., Amann, W., von Kimakowitz, E., Spitzeck, H., Pirson, M. (eds) Humanistic Ethics in the Age of Globality. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230314139_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics