Abstract
In recent years there have been several important critical investigations aimed at overcoming the flaws in economics and business. With regard to economics, different approaches and criticisms have shown that cognitive, ethical, and social limits are always present when agents (and thus economic agents too) make a choice.1 These considerations also tie in with a sharp criticism of the standard notion of rationality and the idea of homo oeconomicus, as they are understood in mainstream economic theory. With regard to business, as well, many inquiries that were focused on the analysis of decision-making within organizations have shown that individual and collective choices are limited or enhanced by ethical, cognitive, and social elements that play a fundamental role in a company’s organization and activity
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Andrews, K. (ed.), Ethics in Practice: Managing the Moral Corporation, (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1989).
Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, translated by D. Ross, revised by J.L. Ackrill and J.O. Urmson, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).
Collier J. and R. Esteban, “Governance in the Participative Organisation: Freedom, Creativity and Ethics”, Journal of Business Ethics 21(2/3) (1999) 173–188.
Cooper, J.M., Reason and Human Good in Aristotle, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975)
Cornelius, N., Building Workplace Equality: Ethics, Diversity and Inclusion, (London: Thomson International Business Press, 2002).
Cornelius, N. and S. Gagnon, “From ethics by proxy to ethics in action: new approaches to understanding ethics and HRM”, Business Ethics: A European Review 8(4) (1999) 225–235.
Cornelius, N. and S. Gagnon, “Re- examining workplace equality: the capabilities approach”, Human Resource Management Journal 10(4) (2000) 68–87.
Cornelius, N. and S. Gagnon, “From equal opportunities to managing diversity to capabilities: a new theory of workplace equality?”, in N. Cornelius (ed.) Equality, Diversity and Inclusion in Work Organizations (Thomson International Business Press, London, 2002) 13–58.
Cornelius, N. and S. Gagnon, “Still bearing the mark of Cain? Ethics and inequality measurement”, Business Ethics: A European Review 13(1) (2004) 26–40.
Cornelius N., Todres M., Janjuha- Jivraj S., Woods A., Wallace J., “Corporate Social Responsibility and the Social Enterprise”, Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2) (2008) 355–370.
Davis, J.B, The Theory of the Individual in Economics, (Routledge, London, 2003).
Dierksmeier, C., “Quantitative oder qualitative Freiheit?”, in P. Becchi et. al (hrsg.), Nationen und Gerechtigkeit, Rechtsphilosophische Hefte; Beiträge zur Rechtswissenschaft, Philosophie und Politik, Band 12, (Frankfurt a.M.- Berlin- Bern- Bruxelles- New York- Oxford- Wien: Peter Lang, 2007).
Giovanola, B., “Personhood and Human Richness. Good and Well- Being in the Capability Approach and Beyond”, Review of Social Economy 63(2) (2005) 249–267.
Giovanola, B., “Sulla capacità di essere felici: riflessioni su ricchezza, benessere e libertà a partire dal capability approach”, Meridiana 56 (2007) 83–104.
Giovanola, B., “Re- Thinking the Anthropological and Ethical Foundation of Economics and Business: Human Richness and Capabilities Enhancement”, Journal of Business Ethics, 88 (2009) 431–444.
Hausman, D.M. and M.S. McPherson, Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy, 2nd edition of Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy, (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press 2006).
Hirsch, F., Social Limits to Growth, (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1976).
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky: 1979, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk”, Econometrica 47(2), 263–291.
Kahneman D., Slovic P., and A. Tversky (eds.): 1982, Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York).
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (eds.), Choices, Values and Frames (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Kant, I.: 1903, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [1785], in Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, Abteilung I: Werke, Band 4 (hrsg. von der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin; subsequently ed. by de Gruyter, Berlin) [English translation by Th. Kingsmill Abbott, edited with revisions by L. Denis, Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals, Broadview Press, Orchard Park, NY, 2005].
Kant, I.: 1974, Vorlesung über Moralphilosophie, in Kant’s gesammelte Schriften, Abteilung IV: Vorlesungen, Band 27 (hrsg. von der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin; subsequently ed. by de Gruyter, Berlin).
Marx, K.: 1844, “Ökonomisch- Philosophische Manüskripte aus dem Jahre 1844”, in Marx- Engels Werke (MEW), Ergänzungsband I (Dietz Verlag, Berlin, 1968) 465–588.
Melé, D., “The Challenge of Humanistic Management”, Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2003) 77–88.
Nussbaum, M., The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986).
Nussbaum, M., “Nature, Function and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplement, (1988) 145–184.
Nussbaum, M., “Aristotelian Social Democracy”, in R.B. Douglass, G. Mara, H. Richardson (eds.), Liberalism and the Good, (New York: Routledge, 1990), 203–252.
Nussbaum, M., “Non- Relative Virtues: an Aristotelian Approach”, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds.), The Quality of Life, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993) 242–269.
Nussbaum, M., “Aristotle on Human Nature and the Foundations of Ethics”, in J.E.J. Altham, R. Harrison (eds), World, Mind and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995) 86–131
Nussbaum, M., Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Nussbaum, M., Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006).
Nussbaum, M. and A. Sen:, “Internal Criticism and Indian Rationalist Traditions”, in M. Krausz (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988).
Robeyns, I., “The Capability Approach – A Theoretical Survey”, Journal of Human Development 6(1), (2005) 93–114.
Sen, A., “Rational Fools”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, (1977) 317–344.
Sen, A., “Equality of what?”, in A. Sen (ed.), Choice, Welfare and Measurement (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980) 353–369
Sen, A., “Well- Being, Agency, and Freedom. The Dewey Lectures 1984”, The Journal of Philosophy 82, (1985) 169–221
Sen, A., On Ethics and Economics, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987a).
Sen, A., The Standard of Living: The Tanner Lectures 1985, ed.G. Hawthorn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987b).
Sen, A., “Capability and Well- Being”, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds.), The Quality of Life (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1993) 30–53.
Sen, A., Development as Freedom, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999a).
Sen, A., Reason before Identity, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999b).
Sen, A., Rationality and Freedom, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002).
Sen, A., “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 32(4) (2004) 315–56.
Sen, A., “Human Rights and Capabilities”, Journal of Human Development 6(2) (2005a) 151–66.
Sen, A., “Why Exactly is Commitment Important for Rationality?”, Economics and Philosophy 21(1) (2005b) 5–14.
Sen, A.:, “La felicità è importante ma altre cose lo sono di più”, in L. Bruni, P.L. Porta (eds), Felicità e libertà. Economia e benessere in prospettiva relazionale (Guerini e Associati, Milano, 2006) 39–58.
Sen A., The Idea of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2009).
Sen, A., and B. Williams (eds), Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).
Simon, H.A., Models of Bounded Rationality, vol. 1, 2 (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1982).
Simon, H.A., Models of Bounded Rationality, vol. 3 (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1997).
Simon, H.A., “Bounded Rationality in Social Sciences: Today and Tomorrow”, Mind & Society 1(1) (2000) 25–41.
Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters E., and D. MacGregor:, “The Affect Heuristic”, in T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (eds), Heuristic and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Thought (Cambridge – New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002) 397–420.
Vogt C. P., “Maximizing Human Potential: Capabilities Theory and the Professional Work Environment”, Journal of Business Ethics 58, (2005) 111–123.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Benedetta Giovanola
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giovanola, B. (2011). Sen and Nussbaum on Human Capabilities in Business. In: Dierksmeier, C., Amann, W., von Kimakowitz, E., Spitzeck, H., Pirson, M. (eds) Humanistic Ethics in the Age of Globality. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230314139_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230314139_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32381-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-31413-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)