Abstract
The work of Michał Kalecki has had a major influence on heterodox theories of growth and distribution. Although heterodox theories which emphasise the role of aggregate demand are usually referred to as being ‘Post Keynesian’, terms such as Kaleckian, neo-Kaleckian and Kalecki-Steindl are also quite popular, and in any case the importance of Kalecki’s contributions to this literature is widely acknowledged.1 Nevertheless, Kalecki’s and Kaleckian contributions have been subject to a fair amount of criticism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Assous, Michael (2003) ‘Kalecki’s contribution to the emergence of business cycle theories: An interpretation of his 1939 Essays’, History of Economic Ideas, 11(1), 99–124.
Auerbach, Paul and Peter Skott (1988) ‘Concentration, competition and distribution — a critique of theories of monopoly capital’, International Review of Applied Economics, 2(1), 44–62.
Bhaduri, Amit and Stephen A. Marglin (1990) ‘Unemployment and the real wage: The economic basis of contesting political ideologies’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), December, 375–93.
Blecker, Robert (1999) ‘Kaleckian macro models for open economies’, in Johan Deprez and John Harvey (eds), Foundations of International Economics: Post-Keynesian Perspectives, London: Routledge.
Committeri, M. (1986) ‘Some comments on recent contributions on capital accumulation, income distribution and capacity utilization’, Political Economy, 2(2), 161–86.
Dallery, T. and van Treeck, T. (2010) ‘Conflicting claims and equilibrium adjustment processes in a stock-flow consistent macro model’, Review of Political Economy, 22(2), 205–33.
Dumenil, Gerard and Levy, Dominic (1999) ‘Being Keynesian in the short term and classical in the long term: The traverse to classical long-term equilibrium’, Manchester School, 67(6), 684–716.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (1984) ‘Stagnation, income distribution and monopoly power’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(1), 25–40.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (1990) Growth, Distribution and Uneven Development, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (1992a) ‘Rentiers in Post-Keynesian models’, in P. Arestis and V. Chick (eds), Recent Developments in Post-Keynesian Economics, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (1992b) ‘Conflict inflation, distribution, cyclical accumulation and crises’, European Journal of Political Economy, 8, 579–97.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (1995) ‘Monopoly power and uniform rates of profit: a reply to Glick-Campbell and Dumenil-Levy’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 27(2), 142–53.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (1997) ‘Equilibrium, path dependence and hysteresis in post-Keynesian models’, in P. Arestis, G. Palma and M. Sawyer (eds), Markets, Unemployment and Economic Policy, London and New York: Routledge.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (2001) ‘Kalecki e os Kaleckianos: A relevância atual de Kalecki’, in L. Pomeranz, J. Moglioli and G. T. Lima (eds), Dinamica economica do capitalismo contemporaneo: Homenagem a M. Kalecki, Sao Paulo: University of Sao Paulo Press, pp. 21–68.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (2006) ‘Aggregate demand, aggregate supply and economic growth’, International Review of Applied Economics, 20(3), 319–36.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (2010) ‘Equilibrium, stability and path dependence in post-Keynesian models of growth’, in Adriano Birolo, Duncan Foley, Heinz D. Kurz, Bertram Schefold and Ian Steedman (eds), Production, Distribution and Trade: Alternative Perspectives, London: Routledge, pp. 233–53.
Dutt, Amitava Krishna (forthcoming) ‘Distributional dynamics in Post-Keynesian growth models’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics.
Eichner, Alfred S. (1976) The Megacorp and Oligopoly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Richard M. (1989) ‘Kalecki’s economic dynamics: a personal view’, in Mario M. Sebastiani (ed.), Kalecki’s Relevance Today, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Harcourt, Geoff C. and Peter Kenyon (1976) ‘Pricing and the investment decision’, Kyklos, 29, 449–72.
Hein, Eckhard (2008) Money, Distribution Conflict and Capital Accumulation. Contributions to ‘Monetary Analysis’, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hein, Eckhard, Marc Lavoie and Till van Treeck (forthcoming) ‘Harrodian instability and the “normal” rate of capacity utilization in Kaleckian models of growth and distribution: a survey’, Metroeconomica.
Kalecki, Michal (1938) ‘The determinants of distribution of national income’, Econometrica, 6, 97–112.
Kalecki, Michal (1954) Theory of Economic Dynamics, London: Allen and Unwin.
Kalecki, Michal (1962) ‘Observations on the theory of growth’, Economic Journal, 72(285), 134–53.
Kalecki, Michal (1971) Selected Essays on the Dynamics of Capitalist Economies, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lavoie, Marc (1992) Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
Lavoie, Marc (1995) ‘The Kaleckian model of growth and distribution and its neo-Ricardian and neo-Marxian critiques’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(6), 789–818.
Lima, Gilberto T. (2000) ‘Market concentration and technological innovation in a dynamic model of growth and distribution’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 215, 447–75.
Rowthorn, Robert E. (1981) ‘Demand, real wages and economic growth’, Thames Papers in Political Economy, Autumn, 1–39.
Sawyer, Malcolm C. (1985) The Economics of Michal Kalecki, London: Macmillan.
Sawyer, Malcolm C. (1996) ‘Kalecki on the trade cycle and economic growth’, in J. E. King (ed.), An Alternative Macroeconomic Theory: The Kaleckian Model and Post-Keynesian Economics, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sen, Anindya and Amitava K. Dutt (1995) ‘Wage bargaining, imperfect competition and the markup: optimizing microfoundations’, Economics Letters, 48(1), 15–20.
Skott, Peter (forthcoming) ‘Theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the Kaleckian investment function’, Metroeconomica.
Steedman, Ian (1992) ‘Questions for Kaleckians’, Review of Political Economy, 4(2), 125–51.
Steindl, Josef (1952) Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Steindl, Josef (1981) ‘Some comments on the three versions of Kalecki’s theory of the trade cycle’, in J. Los et al. (eds), Studies in Economic Theory and Practice: Essays, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Taylor, Lance (1983) Structuralist Macroeconomics, New York: Basic Books.
Taylor, Lance (2004) Reconstructing Macroeconomics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Trigg, Andrew B. (1994) ‘On the relationship between Kalecki and the Kaleckians’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 17(1), 91–109.
You, Jong-Il (1994) ‘Endogenous technical change, accumulation, and distribution’, in A. Dutt (ed.), New Directions in Analytical Political Economy, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
You, Jong-Il and Amitava Krishna Dutt (1996) ‘Government debt, income distribution and growth’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 20(3), 335–51.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Amitava Krishna Dutt
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dutt, A.K. (2011). Economic Growth and Income Distribution: Kalecki, the Kaleckians and Their Critics. In: Arestis, P. (eds) Microeconomics, Macroeconomics and Economic Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230313750_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230313750_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33137-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-31375-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)