Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance and Masculinity

  • Chapter
Masculinity and Film Performance

  • 658 Accesses

Abstract

The term ‘performance’ has been adopted in a variety of ways by numerous disciplines, from literary and theatre studies, to the social sciences and education, spanning both theory and practice. Marvin Carlson has called attention to the ‘essential contestedness’ of performance, arguing that different appropriations of the term are so disparate that ‘a complete survey of them is hardly possible’.1 It is not my intention in this chapter to attempt such a survey. However, there is a great deal to gain in bringing together differently inflected understandings of the concept; while effectively offering distinct and discrete interpretations, differing approaches do share key themes that are more complementary than contradictory. This chapter explores some of the central tenets of performance across disciplinary boundaries and assesses their usefulness in analysing cinematic performances of masculinity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. M. Carlson (1996) Performance: A Critical Introduction (London: Routledge), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Bauman (1977) Verbal Art as Performance (Rowley, MA: Newbury House), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Bial (2007) ‘What is Performance?’ in H. Bial (ed.) The Performance Studies Reader, Second Edition (Abingdon: Routledge), p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Schechner (2007) ‘Performance Studies: The Broad Spectrum Approach’ in Bial (ed.) The Performance Studies Reader, Second Edition (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See also, B. Kirschenblatt-Gimblett (2007) ‘Performance Studies’ in Bial (ed.) The Performance Studies Reader, Second Edition (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Goffman (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: Anchor), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See R. Dyer (1993) ‘The Role of Stereotypes’ in The Matter of Images: Essays on Representation (London: Routledge), pp. 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Naremore (1990) Acting in the Cinema (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press), p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See P. R. Wojcik (2004) ‘Typecasting’ in Wojcik (ed.) Movie Acting: The Film Reader (New York: Routledge), pp. 169–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Schechner (2006) Performance Studies, Second Edition (New York: Routledge), p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Turner (1982) From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play (New York: PAJ Publications), p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kirby (1972) ‘On Acting and Not Acting’, The Drama Review 16(1) (March), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Passing refers to the process whereby a person of one identity (most often applied to race, sexuality and religion), takes on or acts out a different identity or, as M. C. Sanchez and L. Schlossberg describe, ‘passing for what you are not’. M. C. Sanchez and L. Schlossberg (2001) Passing: Identity and Interpretation in Sexuality, Race and Religion (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See also E. K. Ginsberg (ed.) (1996) Passing and the Fictions of Identity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Wald (2000) Crossing the Line: Racial Passing in Twentieth Century US Literature and Culture (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Butler (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge), pp. 173, 176;

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. L. Austin (1955) ‘How To Do Things With Words’, The William James Lectures, Harvard University, reprinted in J. O. Urmson and M. Sbisà (eds) (1962) How To Do Things With Words: J. L. Austin (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). Butler’s consideration of gender performativity is central to a position taken by a number of feminist critics including Marjorie Garber and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See M. Garber (1992) Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing and Cultural Anxiety (New York: Routledge);

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. K. Sedgwick (1990) Epistemology of the Closet (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press);

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. K. Sedgwick and Andrew Parker (eds) (1995) Performativity and Performance (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Butler (1999) ‘Preface 1999’ in Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 10th Anniversary Edition (New York: Routledge), p. xxii.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Butler (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’ (New York, Routledge), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  23. T. Modleski (1991) Feminism Without Women: Culture and Criticism in a ‘Postfeminist’ Age (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Buchbinder (1998) Performance Anxieties: Re-Producing Masculinity (St. Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin), pp. vii, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Robinson (2000) Marked Men: White Masculinity in Crisis (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Cohan (1997) Masked Men: Masculinity and the Movies in the Fifties (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press), p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Drake (2006) ‘Reconceptualizing Screen Performance’, Journal of Film and Video 58 (1–2) (Spring/Summer), 93.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. King (1985) ‘Articulating Stardom’, Screen 26 (5), 27–50;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Higson (1986) ‘Film Acting and Independent Cinema’, Screen 27 (3), 110–32; Naremore, Acting in the Cinema;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. Pearson (1992) Eloquent Gestures: The Transformation of Performance Style in the Griffith Biograph Films (Berkeley, CA: California University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  31. V. W. Wexman (1993) Creating the Couple: Love, Marriage, and Hollywood Performance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press);

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. Krämer and A. Lovell (eds) (1999) Screen Acting (London and New York: Routledge);

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Baron, D. Carson and F. P. Tomasulo (eds) (2004) More Than a Method: Trends and Traditions in Contemporary Film Performance (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Geraghty (2000) ‘Re-Examining Stardom: Questions of Texts, Bodies and Performance’ in Christine Gledhill and Linda Williams (eds) Reinventing Film Studies (London: Arnold), pp. 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Dyer (1979) Stars (London: British Film Institute), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. R. Wojcik (2006) ‘The Sound of Film Acting’, Journal of Film and Video 58 (1–2) (Spring/Summer), 73.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cited in S. Prince and W. E. Hensley (1992) ‘The Kuleshov Effect: Recreating the Classic Experiment’, Cinema Journal 31 (2) (Winter), 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Baron (2007) ‘Acting Choices/Filmic Choices: Rethinking Montage and Performance’, Journal of Film and Video 59 (2) (Summer), 32. Emphasis added.

    Google Scholar 

  39. L. Stern and G. Kouvaros (eds) (1999) Falling for You: Essays on Cinema and Performance (Sydney: Power Publications), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. P. McDonald (2004) ‘Why Study Film Acting? Some Opening Reflections’ in C. Baron, D. Carson and F. Tomasulo (eds) More Than a Method: Trends and Traditions in Contemporary Film Performance (Detroit: Wayne State University Press), pp. 39–40, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Klevan (2005) Film Performance: From Achievement to Appreciation (London: Wallflower), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. Hirsch (1991) Acting Hollywood Style (New York: Harry N. Abrams Publishers/AFI Press), p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  43. J. O. Thompson (1978) ‘Screen Acting and the Commutation Test’, Screen 19 (2), 55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. R. E. Pearson (1999) ‘A Star Performs: Mr March, Mr Mason and Mr Maine’ in P. Krämer and A. Lovell (eds) Screen Acting (London: Routledge), pp. 59–74; McDonald, Why Study Film Acting? pp. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Donna Peberdy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2011 Donna Peberdy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peberdy, D. (2011). Performance and Masculinity. In: Masculinity and Film Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230308701_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation