Skip to main content

Converting Human Material into Tissue Culture, c.1910–70

  • Chapter
Tissue Culture in Science and Society

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History ((STMMH))

  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

The numerous accounts of ‘test-tube babies’ that appeared in the interwar period documented the cultivation of human material. But although these stories drew upon biological practices and were endorsed by scientists, human tissue was in fact hard to maintain and was used far less than chick tissue. Human material rarely survived for more than a few days in vitro, and generated little results of scientific or medical interest. But researchers continued to obtain and culture various types of human tissues, as they believed that any findings obtained from them would be more applicable to patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. John E. Harris, ‘Structure and Function in the Living Cell’, in Michael Johnson and Michael Abercrombie (eds), New Biology Five (London: Penguin, 1948), pp. 26–47, on p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anon., ‘Progress Made in Study of Common Cold: Virus Propagation in Human Tissue’, The Times (28 July 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nick Hopwood, ‘Producing Development: The Anatomy of Human Embryos and the Norms of Wilhelm His’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, Vol. 74, no. 1 (2000), pp. 29–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adele E. Clark, ‘Research Materials and Reproductive Sciences in the United States, 1910–1940’, in Gerald Geison (ed.), Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940 (Bethesda: Williams and Wilkins, 1987), pp. 323–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. For a later case study, see Warwick Anderson, The Collectors of Lost Souls: Turning Kuru Scientists into Whitemen (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Hopwood, ‘Producing Development’ (2000), pp. 38–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a first-hand account, see George W. Corner, The Seven Ages of a Medical Scientist: An Autobiography (Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alexis Carrel and Montrose Burrows, ‘Human Sarcoma Cultivated Outside of the Body’, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 55 (1910), p. 1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrel and Burrows, ‘Human Sarcoma Cultivated Outside of the Body’ (1910), p. 1732.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid. On Carrel’s emphasis on rigorous technical training, see Witkowski, ‘Alexis Carrel and the Mysticism of Tissue Culture’ (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. For more on the practices that transform natural materials into experimental entities, see Anderson, Collectors of Lost Souls (2008), pp. 133–61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael Lynch, ‘Sacrifice and the Transformation of the Animal Body into a Scientific Object: Laboratory Culture and Ritual Practice in the Neurosciences’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 18 (1988), pp. 265–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alexis Carrel and Montrose Burrows, ‘Cultivation of Tissues in Vitro and its Technique’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 13 (1911), pp. 387–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. idem, ‘Cultivation in Vitro of Malignant Tumours’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 13 (1911), pp. 571–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Montrose Burrows, ‘The Cultivation of Human Cancer Cells in Vitro’, Medical Record, Vol. 86 (1914), p. 649.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burrows, ‘Cultivation of Human Cancer Cells’ (1914), p. 649.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Joseph R. Losee and Albert H. Ebeling, ‘The Cultivation of Human Tissue in Vitro’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 19 (1914), pp. 593–602, on p. 602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R.A. Lambert, ‘Technique of Cultivating Human Tissues in Vitro’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 24 (1916), pp. 367–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. idem, ‘The Comparative Resistance of Bacteria and Human Tissue Cells to Certain Common Antiseptics’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 24 (1916), pp. 683–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burrows, ‘Cultivation of Human Cancer Cells’ (1914), p. 649.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lambert, ‘Cultivating Human Tissues’ (1917), p. 372.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lambert, ‘Comparative Resistance of Bacteria and Human Tissue’ (1916), pp. 683–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. As listed in a comprehensive bibliography of tissue culture work compiled in 1953. See Margaret Murray and Gregory Kopech, Bibliography of the Research in Tissue Culture, 1884–1950: An Index to the Literature of the Living Cell Cultivated In Vitro (New York: Academic Press, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See also Henry Harris, The Cells of the Body: A History of Somatic Cell Genetics (Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Press, 1995), p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  25. David Thomson and John Gordon Thomson, ‘The Cultivation of Human Tumour Tissue in vitro’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, London, Vol. 7, no. 1 (1914), pp. 7–20, on p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bland-Sutton served as President of the Royal College of Surgeons between 1923–25. See Anon., ‘Sir John Bland-Sutton’, Nature, Vol. 139 (1937), pp. 223–4. Thomson and Thomson, ‘Cultivation of Human Tissue’.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. idem, ‘The Cultivation of Human Tissue in vitro — Preliminary Note’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character, Vol. 88 (1914), pp. 90–1, on p. 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomson and Thomson, ‘Cultivation of Human Tumour Tissue’ (1914), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. These specimens were donated to the Royal College of Surgeons following Strangeways’s death in 1926, although the collection was destroyed during a bombing raid in World War II. See E.D. Strangeways, ‘1905–1926’ (1962), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Willmer, ‘Tissue Culture from the Standpoint of General Physiology’ (1928), p. 284.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Strangeways, The Technique of Tissue Culture (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Glücksmann to Cantor (15 March 1980). For publications arising from this research, see Alfred Glücksmann, ‘Preliminary Observations on the Quantitative Examination of Human Biopsy Material Taken from Irradiated Carcinoma’, British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 14 (1941), pp. 187–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. idem, ‘Quantitative Histological Analysis of Radiation-Effects in Human Carcinomata’, British Medical Bulletin, Vol. 4 (1946), pp. 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  34. idem, ‘The Influence of Tumour Histology, Duration of Symptoms and Age of Patient on the Radiocurability of Cervix Tumours’, British Journal of Radiology, Vol. 22 (1949), pp. 90–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Honor Fell, ‘Cell Biology’, in Strangeways, Spear and Fell, History of the Strangeways Research Laboratory (1962), pp. 19–32, on p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Spear, ‘Tissue Culture’ (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  37. See for example, Michael G. Mulinos, ‘Cycloserine: An Antibiotic Paradox’, Antibiotics Annual (1956), pp. 131–5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Howard W. Larsh, Stanley L. Silberg and Agnes Hinton, ‘Use of the Tissue Culture Method in Evaluating Fungal Agents’, Antibiotics Annual, Vol. (1957), pp. 918–22.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Charles M. Pomerat, ‘Use of Tissue Cultures in Drug Testing Operations’, in Maurice B. Visscher (ed.), Methods in Medical Research: Volume 4 (Year Book Publishers, 1951), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  40. On the development and impact of antibiotics, see Robert Bud, Penicillin: Triumph and Tragedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Moscona, O.A. Trowell and E.N. Willmer, ‘Methods’, in E.N. Willmer (ed.), Cells and Tissues in Culture: Methods, Biology and Physiology, Volume One (London: Academic Press, 1965), pp. 19–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. K. Russell, ‘Tissue Culture — A Brief Historical Review’, Clio Medica, Vol. 4 (1969), pp. 110–19.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Charity Waymouth, ‘Construction and Use of Synthetic Media’, in Willmer (ed.), Cells and Tissues in Culture (1965), pp. 99–132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Phillip R. White, Cultivation of Animal and Plant Cells (New York: Ronald Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  45. For more detail on George Gey and the roller tube method, see Landecker (2007), pp. 112–19; A. McGehee Harvey, ‘Johns Hopkins — The Birthplace of Tissue Culture: The Story of Ross G. Harrison, Warren H. Lewis and George O. Gey’, The Johns Hopkins Medical Journal, Vol. 136 (1975), pp. 142–9.

    Google Scholar 

  46. A.E. Feller, John F. Enders and T.H. Weller, ‘The Prolonged Coexistence of Vaccinia Virus in High Titre and Living Cells in Roller Tube Cultures of Chick Embryo Tissues’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 72 (1940), pp. 367–88, on p. 385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. John F. Enders, Thomas H. Weller and Frederick C. Robbins, ‘Cultivation of the Lansing Strain of Poliomyelitis Virus in Cultures of Various Human Embryonic Tissues’, Science, Vol. 109 (1949), pp. 85–7, on p. 86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Harris, The Cells of the Body (1995), pp. 40–1.

    Google Scholar 

  49. John Paul, ‘Achievement and Challenge’, in Claudio Barigozzi (ed.), Origin and Natural History of Cell Lines (New York: Alan R. Liss, 1978), pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Joan H. Fujimara, Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996), pp. 44–6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Audrey Fjelde, ‘Human Tumor Cells in Tissue Culture’, Cancer, Vol. 8 (1955), pp. 845–51, on p. 845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Landecker (2007), pp. 135–7. See also, Russell W. Brown and James H.M. Henderson, ‘The Mass Production and Distribution of He La Cells at Tuskegee Institute, 1953–1955’, Journal of the History of Medicine, Vol. 38 (1983), pp. 415–31.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Charles M. Pomerat, ‘Use of Tissue Cultures in Drug-testing Operations’, in Maurice B. Visscher (ed.), Methods in Medical Research (Chicago: Year Book Publishers, 1951), pp. 266–71, on p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  54. W.F. Scherer, Jerome T. Syverton and George O. Gey, ‘Studies on the Propagation In Vitro of Poliomyelitis Virus’, Journal of Experimental Medicine, Vol. 97 (1953), pp. 695–715, on p. 707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Howard W. Larsh, Stanley L. Silberg and Agnes Hinton, ‘The Use of the Tissue Culture Method in Evaluating Antifungal Agents’, Antibiotics Annual (1957), pp. 918–22, on p. 922.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Anon., ‘Congress for Cell Biology Opens: President on Interest in Tissue Culture’, The Times (29 August 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  57. On positive postwar coverage of science and medicine, see Robert Bud, ‘Penicillin and the new Elizabethans’, British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 31 (1998), pp. 305–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Jane Gregory and Steve Miller, Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility (London: Basic Books, 1998), pp. 37–9.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fell, ‘Fashion in Cell Biology’ (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Anon., ‘Nobel Prize for Medicine: Virus Research in United States’, the Manchester Guardian (22 October 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Alistair Cooke, ‘America and Polio: A Day of Rejoicing’, the Manchester Guardian (16 April 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Anon., ‘“Most Stringent Tests Known” for Polio Vaccine: Reassurance by Research Scientist’, the Manchester Guardian (9 March 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Alistair Cooke, ‘Fresh Discovery by Dr Salk: Offshoot of Polio Work may help Cancer Research’, the Manchester Guardian (28 December 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Anon., ‘Human Cells Grown in Laboratory’, The Times (8 September 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Anon., ‘Advance in Study of Common Cold: Viruses Propagated in Tissue Culture’, The Times (29 January 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  66. idem, ‘Tracking Down the Causes of the Common Cold: Slow but Sure Progress Being Made’, The Times (18 January 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  67. idem, ‘Step Forward in Fighting Colds: Virus Under Microscope’, the Manchester Guardian (10 September 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Anon., ‘Seeking Methods of Protection from Atomic Radiation: Work of the Medical Research Council’, the Manchester Guardian (21 July 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Anon., ‘Tracing Heredity in Virus and Man: Cancer Research’, The Times (5 September 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  70. idem, ‘No Cancer in Rats from Tobacco Tar Tests — But Overgrowth in Human Lung’, the Manchester Guardian (11 July 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Anon., ‘Hair Grows on a Dish’, Daily Mail (13 February 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  72. idem, ‘Miss Hardy Grows Hair on a Plate — in Three Weeks’, the Daily Mirror (13 February 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  73. John E. Harris, ‘Structure and Function in the Living Cell’, in M.L. Johnson and Michael Abercrombie (eds), New Biology, Five (London: Penguin, 1948), pp. 26–47, on p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Harris, ‘Structure and Function in the Living Cell’ (1948), p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Science Correspondent, ‘The Laboratory of the Living Cell’, The Times (13 June 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Fell, ‘The Cell as an Individual’ (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Andrew Reynolds, ‘The Cell’s Journey: From Metaphorical to Literal Factory’, Endeavour, Vol. 31 (2007), pp. 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Fell, ‘The Cell as an Individual’ (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Harris, ‘Structure and Function in the Living Cell’ (1948), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Margaret R. Murray, ‘Tissue Culture Procedures in Medical Installations, A: Sources and Handling of Material’, in Maurice B. Visscher (ed.), Methods in Medical Research: Volume 4 (New York: Year Book Publishers, 1951), pp. 211–12, on p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Paul, ‘Achievement and Challenge’ (1978), pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  82. On the American Type Culture Collection, see Toby Appel, Shaping Biology: the National Science Foundation and American Biological Research, 1945–1975 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000). On changes in the freezing, storage and shipping of cultured material, see Landecker (2007), pp. 153–9.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Virginia J. Evans, Naomi M. Hawkins, Benton B. Westfall and Wilton R. Earle, ‘Studies on Culture Lines Derived from Mouse Liver Parenchymatous Cells Grown in Long Term Tissue Culture’, Cancer Research, Vol. 18 (1958), pp. 261–6.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Cooke, ‘Fresh Discovery by Dr Salk’ (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  85. On the Food and Drug Administration’s policy, see Gretchen Vogel, ‘FDA Weighs Using Tumor Cell Lines for Vaccine Development’, Science, Vol. 285 (1999), pp. 1826–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. E.N. Willmer, Tissue Culture (Third edition: London: Methuen & Co., 1964), pp. 57, 61.

    Google Scholar 

  87. E.N. Willmer, ‘Introduction’, in Willmer (ed.), Cells and Tissues in Culture: Methods, Biology and Physiology, Volume One (1965), pp. 1–17, on p. 11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  88. See Michael Gold, A Conspiracy of Cells: One Woman’s Immortal Legacy and the Medical Scandal it Caused (State University of New York Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Alfred Glücksmann, ‘Cell Deaths in Normal Vertebrate Ontogeny’, Biological Reviews, Vol. 26 (1951), pp. 56–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. See also idem, ‘Mitosis and Degeneration in the Morphogenesis of the Human Foetal Lung In Vitro’, Zeitschrift fur Zellfurschung und Mikroskopiche Anatomie, Vol. 64 (1964), pp. 101–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Ilse Lasnitzki, ‘The Effect of 3–4 Benzpyrene on Human Foetal Lung Grown In Vitro’, British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 10 (1956), pp. 510–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. idem, ‘Observations on the Effects of Condensates from Cigarette Smoke on Foetal Lung In Vitro’, British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 12 (1958), pp. 547–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. idem, ‘The Effect of a Hydrocarbon-enriched Fraction of Cigarette Smoke Condensate on Human Fetal Lung Grown in Vitro’, Cancer Research, Vol. 28 (1968), pp. 510–16.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Margaret Brazier, Medicine, Patients and the Law (London: Penguin, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Maurice Pappworth, Human Guinea Pigs: Experimentation on Man (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967), pp. 91–4, 125–6.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Susan C. Lawrence, ‘Beyond the Grave — The Use and Meaning of Human Body Parts: An Historical Introduction’, in Robert Weir (ed.), Stored Tissue Samples: Legal, Ethical and Public Policy Issues (Iowa: University of Iowa Press, 1998), pp. 111–42, on p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Lynn M. Morgan, Icons of Life: A Cultural History of Human Embryos (University of California Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  98. idem, ‘“Properly Disposed Of”: A History of Embryo Disposal and the Changing Claims on Fetal Remains’, Medical Anthropology, Vol. 21 (2002), pp. 247–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Susan Lederer, Flesh and Blood: Organ Transplantation and Blood Transfusion in Twentieth Century America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 24–5. Lederer has elsewhere argued that where opposition to these experimental procedures did arise, it was likely to emanate from US antivivisectionist groups, who linked the dissection of animals for tissue to the mistreatment of patients.

    Google Scholar 

  100. See Lederer, Subjected to Science (1995), pp. 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Huxley, ‘The Tissue Culture King’ (1970), pp. 355–8.

    Google Scholar 

  102. A Pathologist, ‘Cinematography and the Microscope’ (1935), p. 740.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Anon., ‘Tracing Heredity in Virus and Man’ (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Anon., ‘Vaccine Cultivated in Human Embryo Cells: Work on Common Cold Research’, the Guardian (26 July 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Anon., ‘Advance in Study of Common Cold’ (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ruth Faden, quoted in Rebecca Skloot, ‘Henrietta’s Dance’, Johns Hopkins Magazine (April 2000). Available online at http://www.jhu.edu/jhumag/0400web/01.html.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Catherine Waldby and Robert Mitchell, Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2006), pp. 33–4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  108. See also Arjun Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Duncan Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, D. (2011). Converting Human Material into Tissue Culture, c.1910–70. In: Tissue Culture in Science and Society. Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307513_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307513_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32945-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30751-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics