Abstract
Dialogicality is not a new topic. Marková (2005) is of the opinion that thinking in antinomies came to the fore in the nineteenth century, when the concepts of evolution, relativity and interdependence of various phenomena in the natural, human and social sciences required a new theoretical underpinning. In post-Hegelian social science, the idea of dialogicality was established by a number of scholars. Mead (1934) and Vygotsky (1962, 1978) are recognized as the pioneers of this theme in psychology. The functions of internal dialogues were also appreciated by Jung (1961) and representatives of the Gestalt theory. Recently, Hubert Hermans’s conception of the dialogical self has contributed to the growth of interest in the phenomenon.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bakhtin, M. (2003) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992) ‘Relational schemas and the processing of social information’, Psychological Bulletin 112, 461–84.
— (1995) ‘Relational schemas and cognition in close relationships’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 12, 547–52.
Baldwin, M. W., Carrell, S. E. and Lopez, D. F. (1990) ‘Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the pope are watching me from the back of my mind’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 26, 435–54.
Cooper, M. (2003) ‘“I-I” and “I-Me”: Transposing Buber’s interpersonal attitudes to the intrapersonal plane’, Journal of Constructivist Psychology 16, 131–53.
Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R. (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Hermans, H. J. M. (1996) ‘Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange’, Psychological Bulletin 119, 31–50.
— (2001) ‘The construction of a Personal Position Repertoire: Method and Practice’, Culture & Psychology 7, 323–65.
— (2002) ‘The dialogical self as a society of mind: Introduction’, Theory & Psychology 12, 147–60.
— (2003) ‘The construction and reconstruction of a dialogical self’, Journal of Constructivist Psychology 16, 89–130.
Hermans, H. J. M. and Dimaggio, G. (2007) ‘Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: A dialogical analysis’, Review of General Psychology 11, 31–61.
Hermans, H. J. M. and Josephs, I. E. (2003) ‘The dialogical self between mechanisms and innovation’. In Josephs, I. E. (Ed.) Dialogicality in Development (pp. 111–26). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Hermans, H. J. M. and Kempen, H. J. G. (1993) The Dialogical Self. San Diego: Academic Press.
Hermans, H. J. M., Rijks, T. I. and Kempen, H. J. G. (1993) ‘Imaginai dialogues in the self: Theory and method’, Journal of Personality 61, 207–36.
Josephs, I. E. (1998) ‘Constructing one’s self in the city of the silent: Dialogue, symbols, and the role of “as-if” in self-development’, Human Development 41, 180–95.
Jung, C. G. (1961) Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York: Knopf.
Marková, I. (2005) Dialogicality and Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Oleś, P. K. (2009) ‘Czy głosy umysłu da się mierzyć? Skala wewnętrznej aktywności dialogowej (SWAD)’ [Can voices of the mind be measured? The Dialogical Activity Scale (IDAS)], Przegląd Psychologiczny 52, 37–50.
Oleś, P. K., Batory, A., Buszek, M., Chorąży, K., Dras, J., Jankowski, T., Kalinowska, I., Kubala, D., Parzych, J., Sadowski, S., Sosnowska, K, Talik, W. and Wróbel, M. (2010) ‘Wewnętrzne aktywność dialogowa i jej psychologiczne korelaty [Internal dialogical activity and its psychological correlates]’, Czasopismo Psychologiczne 16, 113–27.
Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2005a) ‘Imaginary interlocutors — types and similarity to the self of the individual’. In Oleś, P. K. and Hermans, H. J. M. (Eds) The Dialogical Self (pp. 201–15). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
— (2005b) ‘Wyobrażeni rozmówcy — typy i funkcje’ [Imaginary interlocutors — types and functions], Przegląd Psychologiczny 48(1), 109–23.
— (2006) Nasze wewnętrzne dialogi: O dialogowości jako sposobie funkcjonowania człowieka [Our inner dialogues. About dialogicality as a way of human functioning]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
— (2007) ‘Types and functions of inner dialogues’, Psychology of Language and Communication 11(1), 43–62.
— (2010) ‘Dialogue, monologue and change of perspective — three forms of dialogicality’, The International Journal for Dialogical Science, 4, 67–79.
Puchalska-Wasyl, M., Chmielnicka-Kuter, E. and Oleś, P. (2008) ‘From internal interlocutors to psychological functions of dialogical activity’, Journal of Constructivist Psychology 21, 239–69.
Shotter, J. (1999) ‘Life inside dialogically structured mentalities: Bakhtin’s and Voloshinov’s account of our mental activities as out in the world between us’. In Rowan, J. and Cooper, M. (Eds) The Plural Self. London: Sage.
Siuta, J. (2006) Inwentarz osobowości NEO-PI-R Paula T. Costy Jr i Roberta R. McCrae. Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik [The NEO-PI-R Personality Inventory by Paul T. Costa Jr and Robert R. McCrae. A Polish adaptation. A Handbook]. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
— (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Uchnast, Z. (2000) Inwentarz osobowości NEO-PI-R P. T. Costy, R. R. McCrae, 1992: Wydanie eksperymentalne [The NEO-PI-R Personality Inventory by P. T. Costa and R. R. McCrae, 1992. An experimental version]. Unpublished paper. Lublin: Zakład Psychologii Ogólnej KUL.
Watkins, M. (1986) Invisible Guests. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Małgorzata Puchalska-Wasyl
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Puchalska-Wasyl, M. (2011). Internal Dialogical Activity: Types and Personality Correlates. In: Jones, R.A., Morioka, M. (eds) Jungian and Dialogical Self Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307490_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307490_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33084-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30749-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)