Abstract
Having outlined an explanatory framework for the regulatory use of credit ratings, the next step is to check whether the proposed theoretical model holds any water when it is confronted with empirical evidence. This chapter examines how far the theoretical model introduced in Chapter 3 is able to account for both the common trend and cross-country variations in the use of credit ratings for regulatory purposes. An intertemporal and interregional congruence analysis is performed as an initial test of the empirical tenability of the theoretical model. The analysis checks whether the condition variable (macro-institutional context), the independent variable (public regulators’ dependence on credit rating agencies’ analytical resources) and the dependent variable (public regulators’ use of credit ratings in regulation) of the proposed theoretical model covary over time and across world regions in line with the predictions of the theoretical framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Andreas Kruck
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kruck, A. (2011). Explaining Trend and Variation in the Regulatory Use of Credit Ratings. In: Private Ratings, Public Regulations. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307384_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307384_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32811-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30738-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)