Abstract
The period that I have argued was so distinctive was a short one. It lasted for two years: from the Peterloo massacre in August 1819 to the funeral of Queen Caroline in August 1821. That this was a period of crisis seemed as much to a radical poet, such as Shelley, as to a high Tory, like Robert Southey: ‘It is no longer a question between Ins and Outs, nor between Whigs and Tories. It is between those who have something to lose, and those who have everything to gain by a dissolution of society.’1 The crisis resulted in a victory as swift as it was complete for those who had something to lose. The power of a tiny ruling class, the land-owning aristocracy, was violently ratified; the Peterloo demonstrators were routed, the Cato Street conspirators were either executed or transported and Caroline was ejected from the Abbey. For more than a century, through three carefully orchestrated parliamentary reforms at the end of which universal male suffrage had been all but secured, this class managed to maintain its hegemony. Yet, in this time-frame, poetry and politics became interlinked, as disparate groups of poets struggled to intervene in the representation of major political events. Conceptions of literary stratification, what constitutes ‘high’ and ‘low’ poetry, became undermined as a new kind of writing emerged that became classless in its form.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Ann Hone, For the Cause of Truth: Radicalism in London 1796–1821 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982), 356.
William Benbow, The Crimes of the Clergy, or the Pillars of Priest-craft Shaken; with an Appendix, entitled the Scourge of Ireland, etc. (William Benbow, 1823)
Neil Fraistat, ‘Illegitimate Shelley: Radical Piracy and the Textual Edition as Cultural Performance’, PMLA 109 (1994), 413.
William Benbow, Grand National Holiday, ed. S. A. Bushell (London: Pelagian Press 1996), 9.
Ian Haywood, The Revolution in Popular Culture: Print, Politics and the People, 1790–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 2004), 7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 John Gardner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gardner, J. (2011). Conclusion. In: Poetry and Popular Protest. Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and Cultures of Print. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307377_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307377_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32785-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30737-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)