Abstract
What is masculinity? It’s a question to which various answers have been proffered, not only in the analytical confines of academia, but both explicitly and implicitly in self-help manuals, popular culture, feminism, governmental legislation, psychoanalytic theory, and in various quotidian interactions between boys and their fathers, husbands and wives, children and teachers, and so on and so forth. And indeed, as the chapters of this book demonstrate, it is a question which has been posed in a variety of earlier forms through a variety of historical media, from ancient theatre to medieval chronicles, from early modern letters to nineteenth-century pedagogic tracts. Pierre Bourdieu’s attempt to outline the nature of masculinity is one notable response, perhaps helpful to us most particularly in his insistence upon the deep-rooted character of patriarchy, which he sees as producing and reproducing itself not only via social relations and cultural media but also through the embodied habits and practices of everyday experience. In his account, masculinity — and particularly the habit of masculine domination — has been very hard to challenge, because it has bound itself so very closely both to social power and to ‘just how things are’: a primary example of ‘history turned into nature’, of an ideological practice cloaking itself in the guise of inescapable necessity. We are thus reminded that the analysis of gender is at the heart of the analysis of power relations and politics in general.
This primordial investment in the social games (illusio) which make a man a real man — the sense of honour, virility, ‘manliness’, or, as the Kabyles say, ‘Kabylness’ (thakbaylith) — is the undisputed principle of all the duties towards oneself, the motor or motive of all that a man ‘owes to himself’, in other words what he must do in order to live up, in his own eyes, to a certain idea of manhood.
Pierre Bourdieu, Masculine Domination1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Pierre Bourdieu, Masculine Domination, trans. R. Nice (first published 1998; Cambridge, 2001), p. 48.
For the explicit suggestion that gender was not the determining issue in Scandinavian warrior society, see Carol J. Clover, ‘Regardless of sex: men, women, and power in early Northern Europe’, Speculum 68 (1993), 363–87.
Joan W. Scott, ‘Gender: a useful category of historical analysis’, The American Historical Review 91:5 (1986), 1053–75.
Joan W. Scott, ‘The evidence of experience’, Critical Enquiry 17:4 (1991), 773–97.
For example, the popular reactions to government propaganda revealed in Paul Addison and Jeremy Crang, Listening to Britain: Home Intelligence Reports on Britain’s Finest Hour May-September 1940 (London, 2010).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 John H. Arnold and Sean Brady
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arnold, J.H., Brady, S. (2011). Introduction. In: Arnold, J.H., Brady, S. (eds) What is Masculinity?. Genders and Sexualities in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307254_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307254_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32597-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30725-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)