Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Household Surveys to Capture Vulnerability: Issues and Challenges

  • Chapter
Book cover Vulnerability to Poverty

  • 536 Accesses

Abstract

While the conceptual work on vulnerability reviewed in Chapter 2 is already quite advanced, the actual measurement of vulnerability to poverty of households is lagging behind. In fact, most empirical assessments of vulnerability have used very simplified methods to assess vulnerability to poverty, such as basing them on a single cross-section or vulnerability scores, or related short-cut procedures. Often these assessments are based on rather crude assessments of shocks experienced and risks faced by households. This is not due to the lack of dedication to the task or the fieldwork or econometric skills of the researchers involved. As will be discussed in more detail below, this is largely due to the fact that the measurement of vulnerability to poverty is extremely demanding as far as data needs are concerned. In particular, adequately capturing shocks and risks and their impact on vulnerability is very challenging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Attanasio, O. (2009) ‘Expectations and Perceptions in Developing Countries: Their Measurement and Their Use’, American Economic Review: Papers, & Proceedings 2009, 99(2): 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O. and V. di Maro (2008): “Income Expectations in Rural Mexico: Measurement and Models”, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attanasio, O., C. Meghir and M. Vera-Hernández (2005): “Elicitation, Validation, and Use of Probability Distributions of Future Income in Developing Countries”, mimeo, Paper presented at the 2005 Econometric Society Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bless, H., D. M. Mackie and N. Schwarz (1992) ‘Mood Effects on Encoding and Judgmental Processes in Persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63: 585–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bound, J., C. Brown and N. Mathiowetz (2004): “Measurement Error in Survey Data”, in: Handbook of Econometrics, Chapter 59, Volume 5, 2001: 3705–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruine de Bruin, W. and B. Fischhoff (2000) ‘Verbal and Numerical Expressions of Probability: It’s a Fifty-Fifty Chance’, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 81(1): 115–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo, C. and S. Dercon (2005): “Measuring Individual Vulnerability”, Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, 229, Oxford University, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. J., D. Ruppert, L. A. Stefanski and C. Crainiceanu (2006) Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective, Second Edition. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall/CRC, FL.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2005) ‘Financial Instruments of the Poor: Initial Findings from the Financial Diaries Study’, Development Southern Africa, 22(5): 735–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D., J. Morduch, S. Rutherford and O. Ruthven (2009) Portfolios of the Poor: How the World’s Poor Live on $2 a Day, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mel, S., D. McKenzie and C. Woodruff (2008) ‘Returns to Capital: Results from a Randomized Experiment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4): 1329–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Weerdt, J. (2005): “Measuring Risk Perceptions: Why and How”, SP Discussion Paper, 0533, World Bank, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy, World Bank, Washington DC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delavande, A. and H.-P. Kohler (2008): “Subjective Expectations in the Context of HIV/AIDS in Malawi”, mimeo, Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delavande, A., Giné, X. and D. McKenzie (2009): “Measuring Subjective Expectations in Developing Countries — A Critical Review and New Evidence”, Policy Research Working Paper, 4824, World Bank, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S. (2004) ‘Growth and Shocks: Evidence from Rural Ethiopia’, Journal of Development Economics, 74: 309–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S. (2009) ‘Fate and Fear: Risk and Its Consequences in Africa’, Journal of African Economies, 17(2): 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S. and P. Krishnan (2000) ‘Vulnerability, Seasonality and Poverty in Ethiopia’, Journal of Development Studies, Volume 36(6): 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, J. (1998) ‘Earnings Expectations, Revisions, and Realizations’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 80: 374–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, J. and C. F. Manski (1997): “Using Expectations Data to Study Subjective Income Expectations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92(439): 855–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominitz, J. and C. F. Manski (2004): “How Should We Measure Consumer Confidence?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2): 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbers, C., J. W. Gunning and B. Kinsey (2007) ‘Growth and Risk: Methodology and Micro Evidence’, World Bank Economic Review, 21(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felkner, J., K. Tazhibayeva and R. Townsend (2009) ‘Impact of Climate Change on Rice Production in Thailand’, American Economic Review, 99(2): 205–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan, L., M. Hurd and D. McFadden (2003): “Individual Subjective Survival Curves”, NBER Working Paper, No. 9480, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. M. and A. Richardson-Klavehn (2000): “Remembering and Knowing”, in: E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (eds), Handbook of Memory, Oxford University Press, New York: 229–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giné, X., R. Townsend and J. Vickery (2008): “Rational Expectations? Evidence from Planting Decisions in Semi-Arid India”, mimeo, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harttgen, K. and I. Günther (2009) ‘Estimating Households’ Vulnerability to Idiosyncratic and Covariate Shocks: a Novel Method Applied in Madagascar’, World Development, 37(7): 1222–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. V. (2009) ‘Using Stated Preferences and Beliefs to Identify the Impact of Risk on Poor Households’, Journal of Development Studies, 45(2): 151–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop, D. R. and G. W. Imbens (2001) ‘Bias From Classical and Other Forms Of Measurement Error’, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19: 475–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (2006): “The Perceived Returns to Education and the Demand for Schooling”, mimeo, Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnan, C. (2009): “Distinguishing Barriers to Insurance in Thai Villages”, MIT Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G. and J. Wand (2007) ‘Comparing Incomparable Survey Responses: New Tools for Anchoring Vignettes’, Political Analysis, 15(1): 46–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., C. J. L. Murray, J. A. Salomon and A. Tandon (2004) ‘Enhancing the Validity and Cross-cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research’, American Political Science Review, 98(1): 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, E. (1998) ‘Risk Sharing and Information in Village Economies’, Review of Economic Studies, 65: 847–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, E. and S. Schechter (2003) ‘Measuring Vulnerability’, Economic Journal, 113: 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, E., J. P. Thomas and T. Worrall (2000) ‘Mutual Insurance, Individual Savings, and Limited Commitment’, Review of Economic Dynamics, 3: 216–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, E. (2008): “Time to Change What to Sow: Risk Preferences and Technology Adoption Decisions of Cotton Farmers in China”, Princeton University Working Paper, 526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokshin, M., N. Umapathi and S. Paternostro (2004): “Robustness of Subjective Welfare Analysis in a Poor Developing Country: Madagascar 2001”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3191, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luseno, W., J. G. McPEak, C. B. Barrett, G. Gebru and P. D. Little (2003) ‘The Value of Climate Forecast Information for Pastoralists: Evidence from Southern Ethiopia and Northern Kenya’, World Development, 31(9): 1477–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lybbert, T. J., C. B. Barrett, J. G. McPEak and W. Luseno (2007) ‘Bayesian Herders: Asymmetric Updating of Rainfall Beliefs in Response to External Forecasts’, World Development, 35(3): 480–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, A., A. Tarozzi, J. Yoong and B. Blackburn (2008): “Bednets, Information, and Malaria in Orissa”, mimeo, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (2004) ‘Measuring Expectations’, Econometrica, 72(5): 1329–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. L., A. C. Bemmaor, F. G. Caro, J. Dominitz, B. Jun, A. Lewbel, R. L. Matzkin, F. Molinari, N. Schwarz, R. J. Willis and J. K. Winter (2005) ‘Statistical Analysis of Choice Experiments and Surveys’, Marketing Letters, 16(3/4): 183–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. D. and J. X. Sullivan (2003) ‘Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption’, Journal of Human Resources, 38, Special Issue on Income Volatility and Implications for Food Assistance Programs: 1180–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (1995): “Income Smoothing and Consumption Smoothing” Journal of Economic Perspecttives, 9: 103–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. (2008): “Information, Role Models and Perceived Returns to Education: Experimental Evidence from Madagascar”, mimeo, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, A. and R. Townsend (2004) ‘Entrepreneurship and Financial Constraints in Thailand’, Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(2): 229–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. (2003): “Measuring Aggregate Welfare in Developing Countries: How Well Do National Accounts and Surveys Agree?” Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(3): 645–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. and M. Lokshin (2001) ‘Identifying Welfare Effects Using Subjective Questions’, Economica, 68(271): 335–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. and M. Lokshin (2002) ‘Self-Rated Economic Welfare in Russia’, European Economic Review, 46: 1453–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. (1988) ‘Risk, Implicit Contracts and the Family in Rural Areas of Low-Income Countries’, Economic Journal, 98: 1148–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2003) ‘Self-reports in Consumer Research: The Challenge of Comparing Cohorts and Cultures’, Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4): 588–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri, T. (2005): “Spillovers in Village Consumption: Testing the Extent of Partial Insurance”, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., L. J. Rips and K. Rasinski(2000): The Psychology of Survey Response, Cambridge University Press, New York and Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R. M. (1994) ‘Risk and Insurance in Village India’, Econometrica, 62: 539–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, R. M. (1995) ‘Financial Systems in Northern Thai Villages’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 1011–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udry C. (1994) ‘Risk and Insurance in a Rural Credit Market: An Empirical Investigation in Northern Nigeria’, Review of Economic Studies, 61: 495–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2005): “Household Sample Surveys in Developing and Transition Countries”, Studies in Methods Series, No. 96, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000) World Development Report 2000/2001 — Attacking Poverty, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Stephan Klasen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tobias Lechtenfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felix Povel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Göttingen, Germany

    Stephan Klasen (Professor of Development Economics and Coordinator of the Courant Research Centre ‘Poverty, Equity, and Growth in Developing and Transition Countries’) (Professor of Development Economics and Coordinator of the Courant Research Centre ‘Poverty, Equity, and Growth in Developing and Transition Countries’)

  2. School of Economics and Management, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany

    Hermann Waibel (professor of Agricultural Economics, Director of the Institute of Development and Agricultural Economics) (professor of Agricultural Economics, Director of the Institute of Development and Agricultural Economics)

Copyright information

© 2013 Stephan Klasen, Tobias Lechtenfeld and Felix Povel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klasen, S., Lechtenfeld, T., Povel, F. (2013). Using Household Surveys to Capture Vulnerability: Issues and Challenges. In: Klasen, S., Waibel, H. (eds) Vulnerability to Poverty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306622_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation