Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the most important trends in nuclear power policies in the ‘old’ nuclear power states of Europe (including Eastern Europe and Russia) and North America, in order to put Asian developments in nuclear power policy into a broader context. The chapter starts out by briefly outlining the main features of the most dynamic period of nuclear expansion, starting in the mid-1960s and ending at the time of the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. The following section then discusses the political responses to this highly critical event, which led to a total stagnation in the expansion of nuclear energy. The main thrust of the chapter, however, is on the most recent trends in European and North American nuclear power policy. It discusses, in particular, the extent to and ways in which the ‘Chernobyl legacy’ is being overcome, and, if this is the case, whether this may pave the way for a new period of dynamism in the ‘old’ nuclear world. Sub–themes are the formal policies and strategies pursued by governments, the evolving actor landscape, investment policies and national capacities, and developments within the nuclear engineering industry. The last and concluding section summarises the findings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bode, Sven (2009). ‘Nucs Down in Germany – Prices up in Europe?’, Energy Policy, 37(7): 2492–2497.
Dawson, J. (1996). Eco-Nationalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Energeticheskaya Strategiya (2003). ‘Energeticheskaya Strategiya Rossii na period do 2020 goda (Energy Strategy of Russia for the Period Up to 2020), Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation, 28 August.
Fjæstad, M. (2010). Visionen om outtÖmlig energi: bridreaktorn i svensk kärnkraftshistoria, 1945–80. Hedemora: Gidlunds.
GIF (2008). ‘GIF and Generation IV’, Generation IV International Forum, available athttp://www.gen-4.org/Technology/evolution.htm.
GNEP (2007).‘The Global Energy Nuclear Partnership’, Factsheet. At http://www.gnep.energy.gov.
Greenberg, Michael (2009). ‘Energy Sources, Public Policy, and Public Preferences: Analysis of US National and Site-Specific Data’, Energy Policy, 37(8): 3242–3249.
Gupta, E. (2008). ‘Oil Vulnerability Index of Oil-Importing Countries’, Energy Policy,36(3): 1195–2011.
HÖgselius, Per (2009). ‘Spent Nuclear Fuel Policies in Historical Perspective: An International Comparison’, Energy Policy, 37(1): 254–263.
IAEA (2008).Nuclear Power Reactors in the World,April.Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency
Josephson, P. (2005). ‘Technological Utopianism in the Twenty First Century: Russia’ sNuclear Future’, History and Technology, 19: 277–292.
Kaijser, A. and HÖgselius, P. (2007). Resurs eller avfall? Politiken kring hanteringen avanvänt kärnbränsle i Finland, Tyskland, Ryssland och Japan. Stockholm: SKB.
Kojo, M. (2006). Carl Country Report Finland. University of Tampere.
Radkau, J. (1983). Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Atomwirtschaft, 1945–1975. Verdr–ngte Alternativen in der Kerntechnik und der Ursprung der nuklearen Kontrover. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Romeo, L.M., Calvo, E., Valero, A. and De Vita, A. (2009). ‘Electricity Consumption and CO2 Capture Potential in Spain’,Energy, 34(9): 1341–1350.
Romm, Joseph (2008). The Self-Limiting Future of Nuclear Power. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress Action Fund, 2 June.
Sandberg, Mikael (2008). Ungdomars syn på kärnkraft och demokrati sedan 1980-talet. Attitydepidemier, stigberoenden och teknisk-politisk kulturrevolution. Stockholm: SKB.
Siemens (2009a). ‘Siemens to Divest Its Stake in Areva NP Joint Venture’, Press release,26 January
Siemens (2009b).‘Rosatom and Siemens Sign Memorandum of Understanding on the Creation of a Nuclear Joint Venture’,Press release, 3 March.
Tollefson, Jeff (2008). ‘Nuclear Fuel: Keeping it Civil’, Nature, 451, 24 January: 380–381.
Varchmin, J. and Radkau, J. (1981). Kraft, Energie und Arbeit: Energie und Gesellschaft.Munich: Deutsches Museum.
WNA (2009a). Nuclear Power in the United States, June. World Nuclear Association.
WNA (2009b). Nuclear Power in Canada, September. World Nuclear Association.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Per Högselius
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Högselius, P. (2011). Challenging Chernobyl’s Legacy: Nuclear Power Policies in Europe, Russia and North America in the Early Twenty-First Century. In: Yi-chong, X. (eds) Nuclear Energy Development in Asia. Energy, Climate and the Environment Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306332_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306332_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31645-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30633-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)