Skip to main content

Abstract

Why are corporations engaged in various non-economic activities to meet societal demands (such as environmental protection) beyond their legal obligations? In other words, why do corporations ‘over-comply’ (Heal 2005) with the social demands? Does it benefit corporations (their stockholders)? If so, how? Common-sense-wise an answer may appear obvious. However, it may not necessarily be so for the prevailing framework of economists’ thinking: ‘corporations do not need to do anything beyond legal obligations in order to serve stockholders interests’. The object of this chapter is to suggest an analytical framework to challenge such orthodox views without abandoning the premise of a bounded-rationality of agents concerned (various stakeholders of corporations as well as the citizens of the society). An essential idea is to endogenize the relevance of such social constructs as (individual) social capital, norms, status ascriptions and the like to economic behaviors within an expanded framework of game-theoretic thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • A. Alchian and H. Demsetz (1972) ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review, 62, 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Aoki (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Aoki (2010) Corporations in Evolving Diversity: Cognition, Governance, and Institutions (Oxford UK: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Aoki and Y. Hayami (eds) (2001) Communities and Markets in Economic Development (Oxford and N.Y.: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1955) Ethics, trans. By J. A. K. Thompson (rev. trans. by H. Tredennick) (London: Pengu in Classics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K. J. (1967) ‘The Place of Moral Obligation in Preference Systems’, in S. Hook (ed.) Human Values and Economic Policy (NY: New York University Press). Reprinted in Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, Vol. 1 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Aumann and A. Brandenburger (1995) ‘Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium’, Econometrica, 63, 1161–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Barca, M. Bianchi, F. Brioschi, L. Buzzacchi, P. Casavola, L. Filippa and M. Paganini (1994) I Modelli di Controllo e la Concentrazione Proprietaria Messi a Confronto Empiricamente III vols. Vol. II, Assetti, Proprietà e Controllo nelle Imprese Italiane Medio-Grandi (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. P. Baron (2007) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16, 683–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Berger and T. Luckmann (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Bicchieri (2006) The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Dei Ottati (1994) ‘Trust, Interlinking Transactions and Credit in the Industrial District’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. DiMaggio and W. Powell (eds) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Dowell, S. Hart and B. Yeung (2000) ‘Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?’, Management Science, 46, 1059–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Fehr and C. F. Camerer (2007) ‘Social Neuroeconomics: The Neural Circuitry of Social Preferences’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 419–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Geanakoplos, D. Pearce and E. Stacchetti (1989) ‘Psychological Games and Sequential Rationality’, Games and Economic Behavior, 1, 60–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Glaeser, D. Laibson and B. Sacerdote (2002) ‘An Economic Approach to Social Capital’, Economic Journal, 112, 437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Geertz (1963) Peddlers and Princes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Granovetter (1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 480–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Greif (1993) ‘Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition’, American Economic Review, 83, 525–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Greif (2006) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. (1998) ‘Toward an East Asian Model of Economic Development’, in Y. Hayami and M. Aoki (eds) The Institutional Foundations of East Asian Economic Development (Basingstoke: Macmillan), pp. 3–35.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • G. Heal (2005) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework’, The Geneva Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Heath (2001) Communicative Action and Rational Choice (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hicks (1969) A Theory of Economic History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Izuma, D. N. Saito and N. Sadato (2008) ‘Processing of Social and Monetary Rewards in the Human Striatum’, Neuron, 58, 284–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kandori (1992) ‘Social Norms and Community Enforcement’, Review of Economic Studies, 59, 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. A. King and M. J. Lennox (2001) ‘Does It Really Pay To Be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. R. Montague and G. S. Berns (2002) ‘Neural Economics and the Biological Substrates of Valuation’, Neuron, 36, 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. North (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge, U.K. and New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • E. Ostrom (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Ostrom (2007) ‘Developing A Method for Analyzing Institutional Change’, draft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J-P. and E. Seki (2001) ‘Community Arrangements to Overcome Market Failures: Pooling Groups in Japanese Fisheries’, in M. Aoki and Y. Hayami (eds) Communities and Markets in Economic Development (Oxford:Oxford University Press), p. 344–402.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • K. Polanyi (1944) The Great Transformation (New York : Farrar Rinehart Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rabin (1998) ‘Psychology and Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Samuelson (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Searle (2005) ‘What is an Institution?’ Journal of Institutional Economics, 1, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. S. Siegel and D. F. Vitaliano (2007) ‘An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16, 773–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Weber (1978) Economy and Society, eds. G. Roth and C. Wittich (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Masahiko Aoki

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aoki, M. (2011). Linking Economic and Social-Exchange Games: From the Community Norm to CSR. In: Sacconi, L., Antoni, G.D. (eds) Social Capital, Corporate Social Responsibility, Economic Behaviour and Performance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306189_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics