Skip to main content

Indian Multinationals, Comparative Capitalism and Implications for Global and Host Country Economic Institutions

  • Chapter
The Emergence of Southern Multinationals

Abstract

Although the current financial crisis is having rather harsh repercussions on Asian economies, most observers still expect the importance of Southern economies to rise significantly over coming decades (Figure 17.1). The role of Southern Multinationals will be crucial during this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aguiar, M., Bhattacharya, A. et al. (2006), The New Global Challengers: How 100 Top Companies from Rapidly Developing Economies Are Changing the World. Boston Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar, M., Bhattacharya, A. et al. (2008), The 2008 BCG 100 New Global Challengers. Boston Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Chakrabarti, R. S., De, S., Qian, J., and Qian, M. (2006), Financing Firms in India, European Finance Association, Zürich.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amable, B. (2003), The Diversity of Modem Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, J., Shyh-jer, C., and Lawlwe, J. J. (1998), ‘Variations in Human Resources Management in Asian Countries: MNC Home-country and Host-country Effects’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9 (4), 653–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, A. (2006), FDI and Spillover Effects in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, RIS Discussion Papers No. 113, New Delhi: Research and Information Systems for Developing Countries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruining, H. and Boselie, P. (2005), ‘The Impact of Business Ownership Change on Employee Relations: Buy-outs in the UK and the Netherlands’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16 (3), 345–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BusinessWeek (2005), The BusinessWeek Global 1200. Accessed on April 1, 2007 <http://www.businessweek.com/pdfs/2005/0552_global.pdf>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadha, A. (2005), Trips and Patenting Activity: Evidence from the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, Departmental Working Papers WP0512, Singapore: Department of Economics, National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D. (2000), Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRISIL (2006), ‘Creating the Indian MNC’, CRISIL, New Delhi: Center for Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (1997), ‘Introduction’, in C. Crouch and W. Streeck (eds), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage, 1–32.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Das, N. (2007), ‘The Emergence of Indian Multinationals in the New Global Order’, International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 1 (1/2), 136–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, F. (2005), ‘Is Globalization Making Us All The Same?’ British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43 (4), 569–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1995), ‘Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism’, Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (3), 461–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1998), ‘Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor’, Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (1), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, T., Colling, T., and Ferner, A. (2007), ‘Conceptual Approaches to the Transfer of Employment Practices in Multinational Companies: An Integrated Approach’, Human Resource Management Journal, 17 (3), 201–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli, K. M. (1996), ‘Nationality and Subsidiary Ownership Patterns in Multinational Corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 27 (2), 225–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, A. and Quintanilla, J. (1998), ‘Multinationals, National Business Systems and HRM: The Enduring Influence of National Identity or a Process of ‘Anglo-Saxonization’’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9 (4), 710–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes (2007), ‘The Global 2000’, 1 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune (2007) ‘Global Fortune 500’, available at: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/globa1500/2007/ [accessed 1 April 2007].

  • Goldstein, A. (2007), Multinational Companies from Emerging Economies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. (2006), ‘Emergence of Indian Multinationals’, Technology Exports, 8, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. K. (2006), ‘Inventor Productivity in a Publicly Funded R&D Agency — the Case of CSIR in India’, World Patent Information 26, 235–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001a), ‘An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’, in P. A. Hall and D. Soskice (eds), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamill, J. (1984), ‘Labour Relations Decision Making within Multinational Corporations’, Industrial Relations Journal, 15, 30–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. R. and Boyer, R. (eds) (1997), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G. and Deeg, R. (2006), How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity, MPIfG Discussion Paper 06/02, Cologne: Max Plank Institute for the Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, P. (2006), ‘Acquisitions in BRIC Economies: The Case of India’, in S. Jain (ed.), Emerging Economies and the Transformation of International Business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 138–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kale, D. (2008), Internationalisation strategies of Indian pharmaceutical firms. Paper presented at the Conference on Emerging Multinationals from Emerging and Developing Countries, October 9–10, 2008. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. (2006), ‘Emerging Giants: Building World Class Companies from Emerging Markets’, Harvard Business Review, 84 (10), 60–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (2007), ‘Emerging TNCs: Trends, Patterns and Determinants of Outward FDI by Indian Enterprises’, Transnational Corporations, 16 (1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N. (2008), Internationalization of Indian Enterprises: Patterns, Strategies, Ownership Advantages and Implications. New Delhi: Research and Information System for Developing Countries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milelli, C (2007), Outward Expansion by Indian Firms: The European Route, Working Paper 2007–25, Paris: Economix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S. B. (2006), India’s New Entrepreneurial Classes: The High Growth Economy and Why it is Sustainable, Occasional Paper No. 25, University of Pennsylvania: Center for the Advanced Study of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, M. (1998), ‘Human Resource and Industrial Relations Practices of UK and US Multinationals in Germany’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9 (4), 732–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narlikar, A. (2006), ‘Peculiar Chauvinism or Strategic Calculation? Explaining the Negotiating Strategy of a Rising India’, International Affairs, 82 (1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nölke, A. and H. Taylor (2010), ‘Non-Triad Multinationals and Global Governance. Still a North-South Conflict?’, in M. Ougaard and A. Leander (eds), Business and Global Governance, London: Routledge, 156–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. (2004), ‘The Determinants of Outward Foreign Direct Investment: A Firm-Level Analysis of Indian Manufacturing’, Oxford Development Studies, 23 (4), 619–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. (2007), Growth of Indian Multinationals in the World Economy: Implications for Development, ISID Working Paper, 2007/04, New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. (2007a), Trends and Patterns of Overseas Acquisitions by Indian Multinationals, ISID Working Paper, 2007/10, New Delhi: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. and Alakshendra, A. (2006), Overseas Acquisitions versus Greenfield Foreign Investment: Which Internationalization Strategy is Better for Indian Pharmaceutical Enterprises? Trivandrum: GLOBELICS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. (2008). ‘Indian direct investment in developed region’, Paper presented at Emerging Multinationals from Emerging and Developing Countries, October 9–10, 2008. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. (2008a), ‘Indian direct investment in developing countries’ ISID Working Paper 2008/08. New Dehli: Institute for Studies in Industrial Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. (2008b), Indian Multinationals in the World Economy. New Dehli: Bookwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. P. and Sahu (2007), Transnationalization of Indian Pharmaceutical SMEs. New Delhi: Bookwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. and P. DiMaggio (1991), ‘Introduction’, in W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., and P. DiMaggio (1991a), ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality’, in W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulignano, V. (2006), ‘The Diffusion of Employment Practices of US-based Multinationals in Europe: A Case Study Comparison of British- and Italian-based Subsidiaries’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44 (3), 497–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnam, C. S. V. (1998), ‘Multinational Companies in India’, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9 (4), 567–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R. and Schmitt (2007), ‘No-Vacation Nation’, Washington: Center for Economic & Policy Research, Accessed July 22, 2010. http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/NoVacationNation_asofSeptember07.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarathy, R. (2006), ‘Strategic Evolution and Partnering in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry’, in S. C. Jain (ed.), Emerging Economies and the Transformation of International Business. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 229–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2002), The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2003), ‘French Capitalism Transformed, Yet Still a Third Variety of Capitalism’, Economy and Society, 32, 526–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. and A. Nölke (2010), ‘Indian Multinationals and their Institutional Environment: A Varieties of Capitalism Perspective’, in C. Esser and H. Egbert (eds), Varieties of Capitalism: Dynamics, Economic Crisis, and New Players. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. and Nölke (2010a), ‘Global Players from India: A Political Economy Perspective’, in Karl P. Sauvant, W. Maschek and G. McAllister (eds), Foreign Direct Investment from Emerging Markets: The Challenges Ahead. New York: Palgrave Macmillian, 245–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2005), The Top 100 Non-Financial TNCS From Developing Countries Ranked by Foreign Assets. New York/Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2006), World Investment Report 2006: FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development. New York/Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. T. (1981), ‘Foreign Investors from the Third World’, in K. Kumar and M. G. McLeod (eds), Multinationals from Developing Countries. Lexington, MA/Toronto: Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Company, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. T. (1983), Third World Multinationals: The Rise of Foreign Investment from Developing Countries. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. T. (1986), ‘New and Old Multinationals: Competitors or Partners’, in K. M. Khan (ed.), Multinationals of the South: New Actors in the International Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (1999), Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, A. (2005), ‘(Re)imagining the Indian (Inter)national Economy’, New Political Economy, 10 (2), 163–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Andreas Nölke and Heather Taylor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nölke, A., Taylor, H. (2011). Indian Multinationals, Comparative Capitalism and Implications for Global and Host Country Economic Institutions. In: Brennan, L. (eds) The Emergence of Southern Multinationals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306165_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics