Skip to main content

Chinese and Indian Multinationals in Denmark: Is There Anything Special About Them?

  • Chapter

Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) stock from developing countries has surged in recent decades, with a six-fold increase in the period 1990–2000, and a threefold increase between 2001 and 2008 (UNCTAD, 2006, 2009). Developing country FDI flows have increased from a level around US$ 30 billion in 1990–5 (annual average) to a level around $90 billion in 2000–5; and as a share of global FDI, FDI from these countries has doubled since the 1990s so that they by 2009 account for more than 20 per cent of global FDI (UNCTAD, 2010). The developing country investors are not merely small firms: 99 of the Fortune 500 companies are by 2009 from developing countries. The surge in developing country FDI is mainly derived from investment from Asian developing countries; in the early stages, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, and South Korea were leading, but more recently, India and China have become the leading Asian outward investors. This chapter will focus on the rise of Chinese and Indian investments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, U., Johanson, J., and Vahlne, J-E. (1997), ‘Organic Acquisitions in the Internationalization Process of the Business Firm’, Management International Review, 37 (2), 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, A. I., Hasse, R., and Rabbi, F. (n.d.), ‘Location Determinants of Indian Outward Foreign Direct Investment: How Multinationals Choose their Investments Destinations?’, available at: http://www.google.dk/search?hl=da&source=hp&q=amar+anwar+has se+location+determinants+indian+fdi&btnG=Google-s%C3% B8gning&meta=&aq=f&oq=.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beausang, F. (2003), Third World Multinationals: Engine of Competitiveness or New Form of Dependency? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. (2009), ‘The Impact of the Global Factory on Economic Development’, Journal of World Business, 131–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P., Wang, C., and Clegg, J. (2007), ‘The Impact of Foreign Ownership, Local Ownership and Industry Characteristics on Spillover Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in China’, International Business Review, 16 (2), April, 142–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish National Bank Statistics Bank, http://nationalbanken.statistikbank.dk/statbank5a/default.asp?w=1280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danmarks Statistik (2009), Udenlandske firmaer i Danmark, Copenhagen, Danmarks Statistik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1981), ‘Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Developmental Approach’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117 (1), 30–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1988), ‘The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and some Possible Extensions’, Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. and Narula, R. (1996), ‘The Investment Development Path Revisited: Some Emerging Issues’, in J. H. Dunning and R. Narula (eds), Foreign Direct Investment and Governments: Catalysts for Economic Restructuring. London: Routledge, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. and Namla, R. (2004), ‘Industrial Development, Globalization and Multinational Enterprises: New Realities for Developing Countries’, in J. H. Dunning and R. Narula (eds), Multinational and Industrial Competitiveness. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 38–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., Kim, C., and Park, D. (2008), Old Wine in New Bottles: A Comparison of Emerging Market TNCs Today and Developed Country TNCs Thirty Years Ago, SLPTMD Working Paper Series No. 11, Department of International Economics, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, D. (2000), ‘Inter-Organizational Knowledge Outsourcing: What Permits Small Taiwanese Firms to Compete in the Computer Industry?’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17 (2), 223–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kalinsky, R., and Sturgeon, T. (2001). ‘Introduction: Globalization, Value Chains, and Development’, IDS Bulletin, 32 (3), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962), Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddy, I. H. and Young, S. (1982), ‘Conventional Theory and Unconventional Multinationals: Do New Forms of Multinational Enterprise Require New Theories?’, in A. M. Rugman (ed.), New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise. London: Croom Helm, 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R., Almeida, P., and Song, J. (2000), ‘Knowledge and the Multinational Enterprise’, in C. Millar. et al. (eds), International Business: Emerging Issues and Emerging Markets. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, F., Milelli, C., and Shi, Y. (2008), Présence et Stratégies des firmes chinoises et indiennes en Europe: une perspective dynamique et comparative, Direction Générale des Entreprises, Ministère de l’Economie, des Finances et de l’Emploi, Paris, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1995), Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1997), ‘Latecomer Catch-up Strategies in Electronics: Samsung of Korea and Taiwan’, Asia Pacific Business Review, 4 (2–3), 48–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. Ø. (2009), ‘Off-shoring of Advanced and High-Value Technical Services: Antecedents, Process Dynamics and Firm Level Impacts’, PhD thesis, Copenhagen Business School, CBDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J. and Vahlne, J. (1977), ‘The Internationalization Process of the Firm — A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments’, Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. G. (2000), ‘Emerging Giants: Building World-class Companies in Emerging Markets’, Harvard Business Review, 84, 60–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuada, J. (2004). ‘Internationalization of Firms from Developing Countries: Towards an Integrated Conceptual Framework’, paper presented to conference on ‘Globalization, Internationalization of Companies and Cross Cultural Management’, Alborg, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (ed.) (1983), The New Multinationals: The Spread of Third World Enterprises. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasserre, P. (2007), Global Strategic Management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecraw, D. J. (1993), ‘Outward Direct Investment by Indonesian Firms: Motivation and Effects’, Journal of International Business Studies, 24 (3), 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. P. (2007), ‘Toward an Integrated Theory of Multinational Evolution: The Evidence of Chinese Multinational Enterprises as Latecomers’, Journal of International Management, 13, 296–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. (2006), ‘Dragon Multinationals: New Players in 21st Century Globalization’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23, 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. (2002), Entry Strategy Analysis: Towards an Eclectic Framework, Copenhagen Business School, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narula, R. (2006), ‘Globalization, New Technologies, New Zoologies, and the Purported Death of the Eclectic Paradigm’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23 (2), 143–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. and McDougall P. (1994), ‘Toward a Theory of International New Ventures’, Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobelli, C., Rabellotti, R., and Sanfilippo, M. (2009), ‘Chinese FDIs in Italy’, paper presented to the 6th Asialics International Conference, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan, J. (2007), ‘Growth of Indian Multinationals in the World Economy: Implications for Development’, MPRA Paper No. 12360, MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2008), ‘What Have We Learned About Emerging-Market MNEs? Insights from a Multi-Country Research Project’, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark, October 9–10, 2–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2009), ‘FDI from Developing Countries’, paper presented to the 3rd Vale Conference on Sustainable Investment, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. and Singh, J. (2008), ‘Indian Multinationals: Generic Internationalization Strategies’, in R. Ramamurti and J. Singh (eds), Emerging Multinationals from Emerging Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. and Li, J. (2007), ‘Will China’s Multinationals Succeed Globally or Regionally?’ European Management Journal, 25 (5), October, 333–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, L. and Jain, V. (2009), Emerging Pattern of India’s Outward Foreign Direct Investment Under the Influence of State Policy: A Macro View. Patiala: Punjabi University for Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2000), ‘Firm Capabilities, and Economic Development: Implications for NIEs’, in Technology, Learning and Innovation, ed. L. Kim and R. R. Nelson. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 105–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolentino, P. E. (2008), ‘Explaining the Competitiveness of Multinational Companies from Developing Economies: A Critical Review of the Academic Literature’, International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 4 (1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2006), World Investment Report: Developing Country FDI. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2009), World Investment Report: The Role of FDI in Agriculture. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2010), World Investment Report: FDI and Climate Change, Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966), ‘International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (2), 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2009), ‘Betting on Chinese Electronic Cars? Analyzing BYD’s Innovation Capability’, Paris, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. T. (1983), Third World Multinationals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2009), 2009 Benchmarking Study by World Bank of FDI Policies and Investment Promotion Agencies, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Jens Erik Torp, Michael W. Hansen, and Henrik Schaumburg-Müller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Torp, J.E., Hansen, M.W., Schaumburg-Müller, H. (2011). Chinese and Indian Multinationals in Denmark: Is There Anything Special About Them?. In: Brennan, L. (eds) The Emergence of Southern Multinationals. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306165_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics