Skip to main content

Modes of Address Between Female Staff in Georgian Professional Discourse: Medical and Academic Contexts

  • Chapter
Book cover Politeness Across Cultures

Abstract

Very little has been published on linguistic politeness in the Georgian language or culture. Rukhadze (2002) focused on address forms, drawing mainly on the theories of Brown and Levinson (1987) and Scollon and Scollon (2001). She was interested largely in a comparative analysis of face-saving strategies in Georgian and English. Her work, however, has been published only in Georgian and is not accessible to the majority of researchers in the field of politeness research. While Rukhadze was innovative in her analysis of the use of conventional politeness strategies, she did not make use of natural language data in her work. Nevertheless, she points to the crucial significance of in-groups and out-groups as defining concepts in Georgian culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akdogan, P. (2007) ‘A Contrastive Study of the Uchi-soto Relationship in Japanese and Turkish’, Hiroshima Daigaku Daigakuin Kyoukugaku Kenkyuka Kiyoo Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Hiroshima University. Part. II, 56, Hiroshima, Japan, Hiroshima University Press, pp. 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, D. (2008) Impoliteness in Interaction, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, F. (1988) Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., and Levinson, S.C. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., and Ford, M. (1961) ‘Address in American English’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, pp. 375–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., and Gilman, A. (1960) ‘The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity’, in T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J. (2005) ‘Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link’, Journal of Politeness Research, 1/1, pp. 35–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D., and Wichmann, A. (2003) ‘Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodie Aspects’, Journal of Pragmatics, 1/10, pp. 1545–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kadt, E. (1998) ‘The Concept of Face and Its Applicability to the Zula Language’, Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp. 349–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eelen, G. (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester, St. Jerome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, W.H. (2003) ‘In Pursuit of Culture’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, pp. xiv, 1-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2001) ‘Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse’, Discourse and Society, 1/4, pp. 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2003) ‘Politeness and Power: Making and Responding to “Requests” in Institutional Settings’, Text, 1/1, pp. 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2007) ‘Politeness and Power’, in C. Llamas, L. Mullany and P. Stockwell (eds), The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics, London, Routledge, pp. 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, A., Nogata, T., Miyaki, M., Nagao, A., and Iuzuka, H. (1981) ‘Address-Forms in Modern Japanese: A Sociolinguistic Analysis’, Sophia Linguistica, 3, pp. 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamei, Y. (2007) ‘Uchi/Soto and Linguistic Expressions’, KGPS Review, N7, October, pp. 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikvidze, Z. (1999) ‘A Plural or an Honorific? Morpho-syntactic and Sociolinguistic Rules for Their Differentiation’, paper presented at the Symposium ‘Grammatik i fokus’, Lund University, Sweden, 11-12 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makino, S. (1996) Uchi to soto no gengubunkagaku [The Study of Culture of In-Group and Out-Group], Tokyo, ALC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. (2003) Gender and Politeness, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S. (2011) ‘Discursive Approaches to Politeness and Impoliteness’, in Linguistic Politeness Research Group (LPRG) (ed.), Discursive Approaches to Politeness, Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaishvili, M. (2000) The Georgian Language, Tbilisi, TSU Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto, S. (2004) ‘Ideology in Linguistic Practice and Analysis: Gender and Politeness in Japanese Revisited’, in S. Okamoto and J. Shibamoto Smith (eds), Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology, New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y. (2000) Politeness in Chinese Face-to-Face Interaction: Advances in Discourse Processes, Stanford, Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rukhadze, N. (2002) ‘Face and Politeness While Expressing Solidarity in Present-Day English, Georgian and Russian’, Lingusitic Papers, XII, pp. 221–230 (in Georgian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., and Scollon, S.W. (2001) Intercultural Communication, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukle, R. (1994) ‘UCHI/SOTO: Choices in Directive Speech Acts in Japanese’, in J. Bachnic and C. Quinn (eds), Situated Meaning, Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkourafi, M. (2005) ‘Beyond the Micro Level in Politeness Research’, Journal of Politeness Research, 1/2, pp. 237–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. (2003) Politeness, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Manana Rusieshvili

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rusieshvili, M. (2011). Modes of Address Between Female Staff in Georgian Professional Discourse: Medical and Academic Contexts. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Kádár, D.Z. (eds) Politeness Across Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305939_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics