Abstract
Research has shown that there are variations in what is being claimed as one’s face, that is, ‘positive social value’ (Goffman 1967), and how the claims are made, between cultures (Brown and Levinson 1987; Ide 1989; O’Driscoll 1996). When participants from different cultural backgrounds communicate with each other, their different interacional rules must be negotiated so that potential threats to face can be avoided. Because the judgement of face threat and/or im/politeness usually lies with the receiver of such actions (Spencer-Oatey 2005), failure to observe what is ‘appropriate’ in the receiver’s culture can threaten face (e.g. Spencer-Oatey and Xing 2003). Thus, a new set of interactional norms, which combines the different norms that participants bring to the interaction, may emerge within a group of people from different cultural backgrounds who are involved in a continuous relationship (Sunaoshi 2005).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arundale, R. (2006) ‘Face as Relational and Interactional: A Communication Framework for Research on Face, Facework, and Politeness’, Journal of Politeness Research, 1/2, pp. 193–216.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2003) ‘Face and Politeness: New (Insights) for (Old) Concepts’, Journal of Pragmatics, 35/10-11, pp. 1453–1469.
Brown, P., and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H.H., and Carlson, T.B. (1982) ‘Hearers and Speech Acts’, Language, 1/2, pp. 332–373.
Ervin-Tripp, S., Nakamura, K., and Guo, J. (1995) ‘Shifting Face from Asia to Europe’, in M. Shibatani and S. Thompson (eds), Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: Essays in Honour of Charles J. Fillmore, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 43–71.
Fraser, B. (1990) ‘Perspectives on Politeness’, Journal of Pragmatics, 14, pp. 219–236.
Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, New York, Pantheon Books.
Haugh, M. (2005) ‘The Importance of “Place” in Japanese Politeness: Implications for Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Analyses’, Intercultural Pragmatics, 1/1, pp. 41–68.
Haugh, M. (2007) ‘Emic Conceptualisations of (Im)politeness and Face in Japanese: Implications for the Discursive Negotiation of Second Language Learner Identities’, Journal of Pragmatics, 1/4, pp. 657–680.
Haugh, M. (2009) ‘Face and Interaction’, in F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh (eds), Face, Communication and Social Interaction, London, Equinox, pp. 1–30.
Haugh, M., and Hinze, C. (2003) ‘A Metalinguistic Approach to Deconstructing the Concepts of “Face” and “Politeness” in Chinese, English and Japanese’, Journal of Pragmatics, 35/10-11, pp. 1581–1611.
Haugh, M., and Watanabe, Y. (2009) ‘Analysing Japanese Face-in-Interaction’, in F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh (eds), Face, Communication and Social Interaction, London, Equinox, pp. 78–95.
Ho, D.Y.-F. (1994) ‘Face Dynamics: From Conceptualization to Measurement’, in S. Ting-Toomey (ed.), The Challenge of Facework, New York, State University of New York Press, pp. 269–286.
Holmes, J. (2000) ‘Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace’, Discourse Studies, 2, pp. 159–185.
Ide, S. (1989) ‘Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness’, Multilingua, 8/2-3, pp. 223–248.
Ide, S. (2006) Wakimae no goyoron [The Pragmatics of Wakimae], Tokyo, Taishukan shoten.
Lo Bianco, J., Liddicoat, A., and Crozet, C. (1999) Striving for the Third Place, Melbourne, Language Australia.
Mao, L. (1994) ‘Beyond Politeness Theory: “Face” Revisited and Renewed’, Journal of Pragmatics, 21, pp. 451–486.
Matsumoto, Y. (1988) ‘Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese’, Journal of Pragmatics, 12, pp. 403–426.
O’Driscoll, J. (1996) ‘About Face: A Defence and Elaboration of Universal Dualism’, Journal of Pragmatics, 1/1, pp. 1–32.
Raven, B.H. (1993) ‘The Bases of Power: Origins and Recent Development’, Journal of Social Issues, 1/4, pp. 227–251.
Schwartz, S.H. (1992) ‘Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, pp. 1–65.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000) ‘Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis’, in H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures, London, Continuum, pp. 11–46.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005) ‘(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships’ Journal of Politeness Research, 1/1, pp. 95–120.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007) ‘Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face’, Journal of Pragmatics, 1/4, pp. 639–656.
Spencer-Oatey, H., and Xing, J. (2003) ‘Managing Rapport in Intercultural Business Interactions: A Comparison of Two Chinese-British Welcome Meetings’, Journal of Intercultural Studies, 1/1, pp. 33–46.
Sunaoshi, Y. (2005) ‘Historical Context and Intercultural Communication: Interactions between Japanese and American Factory Workers in the American South’, Language in Society, 1/2, pp. 185–217.
Takiura, M. (2008) Poraitonesu Nyuumon [Introduction to Politeness], Tokyo, Kenkyusha.
Verschueren, J. (1999) Understanding Pragmatics, London, Arnold.
Yabuuchi, A. (2004) ‘Face in Chinese, Japanese, and U.S. American Cultures’, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 1/2, pp. 261–297.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Yasuhisa Watanabe
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Watanabe, Y. (2011). Conflict, Culture and Face. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Kádár, D.Z. (eds) Politeness Across Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305939_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305939_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31456-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30593-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)