Abstract
This chapter explores a range of issues linked to the inclusion of film violence within the undergraduate learning experience from the perspective of students. It contributes to the discussion contained within this volume through the foregrounding of the views of learners within debates over the interplay between textual and contextual factors impacting upon how films are valued. The chapter also seeks to inform pedagogic discussion linked to the value of including potentially challenging films within the undergraduate curriculum. The investigation draws empirical evidence from qualitative questionnaires completed by final-year students who took the module ‘The Regulation of Film Violence in Britain’ at the University of Winchester during the academic year 2007–8. While this is a small-scale empirical project conducted in the UK, it is suggested that its findings constitute a starting point for the broader consideration of the value of including potentially challenging texts within Higher Education (HE) curricula.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works cited
Barker, M. (1995) ‘Violence’, Sight and Sound, 5:6, 10–13.
— (2006) ‘Taking The Bull By the Horn’, unpublished paper, Violent Film conference, Winchester University, 7–9 July.
Barker, M. and Petley, J. (eds) (2001) ILL Effects: The Media/Violence Debate, 2nd edn (London: Routledge).
Boyle, K. (2005) Media and Violence (London: Sage).
Bragg, S. (2001) ‘Just What the Doctors Ordered’, in M. Barker and J. Petley (eds) ILL Effects: The Media/Violence Debate, 2nd edn (London: Routledge).
Corner, J. (1998) ‘Approaches: Why Study Media Form?’ in A. Briggs and P. Cobley (eds) The Media: An Introduction (Harlow: Longman).
Edgar, A. and Sedgwick, P. (2008) Cultural Theory: The Key Concepts, 2nd edn (London: Routledge).
Freeland, C. A. (1995) ‘Realist Horror’, in C. A. Freeland and T. E. Wartenberg (eds) Philosophy and Film (London: Routledge).
Kendrick, J. (2009) Film Violence: History, Ideology, Genre (London and New York: Wallflower).
Martin, E. (1999) Changing Academic Work: Developing the Learning University (Buckingham: The Society for Research in HE and Open University Press).
McEwan, P. (ed.) (2007) ‘In Focus: Teaching “Difficult” Films’, Cinema Journal, 47:1, 93–116.
McGuigan, J. (1996) Culture and the Public Sphere (London: Routledge).
McKinney, D. (1993) ‘Violence: The Strong and the Weak’, Film Quarterly, 46:4, 16–22.
Morrison, D. E. (1999) Defining Violence: The Search for Meaning (Luton: Luton University Press).
Potter, W. J. (1999) On Media Violence (London: Sage).
Sconce, J. (2002) ‘Esper, the renunciator: Teaching “Bad” Movies to Good Students’, in M. Jancovich, A. L. Reboll, J. Stringer and A. Willis (eds) Defining Cult Movies: The Cultural Politics of Oppositional Taste (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
Sharrett, C. (ed.) (1999) Mythologies of Violence in Postmodern Media (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press).
Trend, D. (2007) The Myth of Media Violence (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Shaun Kimber
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kimber, S. (2011). Valuing Film Violence: Student Perceptions on the Inclusion of Violent Films and Film Violence within the Undergraduate Learning Experience. In: Hubner, L. (eds) Valuing Films. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305854_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305854_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31104-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30585-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)