Abstract
If the Northern Ireland conflict is at an end, what place is there for apology and regret among those who orchestrated and carried out violence and what do attitudes about each of these areas from the protagonists tell us about moral responsibility in a ‘post conflict’ society? This chapter is a tentative attempt to explore such questions with specific reference to loyalists who engaged in acts of violence and murder. Although one might expect different reactions about apology and regret dependent on the extent of violence and murder perpetrated, it is evident that for most of the loyalists interviewed here a preoccupation with apology and regret is seen as counterproductive to the challenges of a changed political environment, as well as likely to entrench the interests of conflict rather than help move beyond that conflict. It is this perception and the understandings which surround it that I particularly want to explore in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Graham Spencer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spencer, G. (2011). Loyalist Perspectives on Apology, Regret and Change. In: McAuley, J.W., Spencer, G. (eds) Ulster Loyalism after the Good Friday Agreement. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305830_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305830_18
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31028-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30583-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)