Abstract
My primary observations about the solidarist approach to humanitarian intervention were directed at its method of theorising. I considered this approach to be limited, in the sense that it focuses primarily on the process of deciding whether or not to intervene in situations of SHE. I argued that this method was unsustainable because it failed to address the contextual basis upon which SHEs have developed in the past. This seemed to me an important limitation in view of its immense implications and consequences for what international society understands as the provision of ‘moral duties’ (Wheeler and Bellamy, 2001: 477) and of taking on the ‘guardianship of human rights everywhere’ (Bull cited in Wheeler, 2000: 12).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Karina Z. Butler
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butler, K.Z. (2011). Conclusion. In: A Critical Humanitarian Intervention Approach. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305274_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305274_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30352-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30527-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)