Abstract
The importance and electoral impact of campaigning at constituency level is now widely accepted. A variety of different research teams have repeatedly demonstrated the electoral benefits of well-organised and intense election campaigns at constituency level in Britain, despite using different methodological approaches and measures of campaign strength (see, for example, Denver et al., 2003; Fieldhouse and Cutts, 2008; Pattie et al., 1995; Whiteley and Seyd, 1994). Fisher and Denver (2008) have also shown how the campaign at constituency level has become increasingly modernised. Modernisation — the utilisation of devices such as telephones and computers — has become core to campaigning, becoming more prevalent than traditional-style campaigning (though not necessarily matching the latter’s electoral benefits) (Fisher and Denver, 2009).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Denver, D. and Hands, G. (1997) Modern Constituency Electioneering. London: Frank Cass.
Denver, D., Hands, G., Fisher, J. and MacAllister, I. (2003) ‘Constituency Campaigning in Britain 1992–2001: Centralisation and Modernisation’, Party Politics, 9: 541–59.
Fieldhouse, E. and Cutts, D. (2008) ‘The Effectiveness of Local Party Campaigns in 2005: Combining Evidence from Campaign Spending and Agent Survey Data’, British Journal of Political Science, 39: 367–88.
Fisher, J. (2000) ‘Small Kingdoms and Crumbling Organisations: Examining the Variation in Constituency Party Membership and Resources’, British Elections & Parties Review, 10: 133–150.
Fisher, J. (2005) ‘Campaign Finance’, in Geddes, A. and Tonge, J. (eds) Britain Decides: The General Election of 2005. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 170–186.
Fisher, J. (2010) ‘Party Finance — Normal Service Resumed?’ Parliamentary Affairs, 63: 778–801.
Fisher, J. and Denver, D. (2008) ‘From Foot-Slogging to Call Centres and Direct Mail: A Framework for Analysing the Development of District-Level Campaigning’, European Journal of Political Research, 47: 794–826.
Fisher, J. and Denver, D. (2009) ‘Evaluating the Electoral Effects of Traditional and Modern Modes of Constituency Campaigning in Britain 1992–2005’, Parliamentary Affairs, 62: 196–210.
Fisher, J., Denver, D. and Hands, G. (2006) ‘Party Membership and Campaign Activity in Britain: The Impact of Electoral Performance’, Party Politics, 12: 505–19.
Fisher, J., Denver, D., Fieldhouse, E., Cutts, D. and Russell, A. (2007) ‘Constituency Campaigning in 2005: Ever More Centralization?’ in Wring, D., Green, J., Mortimore, R. and Atkinson, S. (eds) Political Communications: The British General Election of 2005. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 79–92.
Kavanagh, D. and Cowley, P. (2010) The British General Election of 2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Pattie, C. J., Johnston, R. J. and Fieldhouse, E. A. (1995) ‘Winning the Local Vote: The Effectiveness of Constituency Campaign Spending in Great Britain, 1983–1992’, American Political Science Review, 89(4): 969–83.
Whiteley, P. and Seyd, P. (1994) ‘Local Party Campaigning and Voting Behaviour in Britain’, Journal of Politics, 56: 242–51.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Justin Fisher, David Cutts and Edward Fieldhouse
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fisher, J., Cutts, D., Fieldhouse, E. (2011). Constituency Campaigning in 2010. In: Wring, D., Mortimore, R., Atkinson, S. (eds) Political Communication in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305045_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305045_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-30146-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30504-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)