Advertisement

Genomics

  • Nayef R. F. Al-Rodhan
Part of the St Antony’s Series book series

Abstract

Genomics is the study of genes and the specific characteristics that make people, plants, bacteria and animals who or what they are. In some senses, genomics is the science most focused on the unique traits of the individual. Although genetics can be an intensely personal field of science, its applications and the applications of related sciences such as proteomics affect human health and agriculture on a global scale.

Keywords

Human Genome Project Strategic Technology Epigenetic Drug Embryo Research Global Genomic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    ‘T. Acharya, A.S. Daar, E. Dowdeswell, P.A. Singer and H. Thorsteinsdóttir (2004), Genomics and Global Health: A Report of the Genomics Working Group of the Science and Technology Task Force of the United Nations Millennium Project (Toronto: Joint Center for Bioethics) http://belfercenter.ksg.har-vard.edu/files/genomics.pdf, date accessed 12 August 2010, p. 6.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Acharya et al. (2004), Genomics and Global Health: A Report of the Genomics Working Group of the Science and Technology Task Force of the United Nations Millennium Project, p. 9.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    P. Baldi and G.W. Hatfield (2002), DNA Microarrays and Gene Expression: From Experiments to Data Analysis and Modeling (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    Committee on Advances in Technology and the Prevention of Their Application to Next Generation Biowarfare Threats, Development, Security, and Cooperation Policy and Global Affairs Division, Board on Global Health, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies (2006), Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press), p. 15.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    G.J. Hannon (2002), ‘RNA Interference’, Nature, Vol. 418, July, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12110901, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  6. 8.
    Cf. K. Nixdorff and W. Bender (2002), ‘Biotechnology, Ethics of Research and Potential Military Spin-off’, International Network of Engineers and Scientists Against Proliferation, Information Bulletin, No. 19, March.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    A. Harmon (2008), ‘Gene Map Becomes a Luxury Item’, International Herald Tribune, 4 March, http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/04/healthscience/04geno.php, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  8. 12.
  9. 14.
    P. Ball (2010), ‘Bursting the Genomics Bubble’, Nature News, 31 March, http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100324/full/news.2010.145.html, date accessed 12 August 2010; N. Wade (2010), ‘A Decade Later, Genetics Maps Yields Few New Cures’, The New York Times, 13 June, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/13/health/research/13genome.html, date accessed 12 August 2010; A. Pollack (2010), ‘The Genome at 10: Awaiting the Genome Payoff, The New York Times, 15 June, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/15/business/15genome.html, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  10. 16.
    J. Henry, R. Phillips F Carpanini, J.C. Corton, K. Craig, K. Igarashi, R. Leboeuf, G. Marchant, K. Osborn, W.D. Pennie, L.L. Smith, M.J. Teta and V. Vu (2002), ‘Use of Genomics in Toxicology and Epidemiology: Findings and Recommendations of a Workshop’, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 110, No. 10, October, 1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 17.
    Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) (2008), Guide to Biotechnology 2008 (Washington, D.C.: BIO), http://bio.org/speeches/pubs/er/Biotech-Guide2008.pdf, date accessed 17 August 2010, p. 27.Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    Ibid., p. 30.Google Scholar
  13. 23.
    C. Cookson (2008), ‘Research: Three Technologies That Could Transform Patient Care’, The Financial Times, 3 July, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/668c7654-4898-11dd-a851000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  14. 24.
  15. 29.
    National Research Council of the National Academies (2003), Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press), p. 16.Google Scholar
  16. 30.
    S.G. Uzogara (2000), ‘The Impact of Genetic Modification of Human Foods in the 21st Century: A Review’, Biotechnology Advances, No. 18, 180.Google Scholar
  17. 31.
    T. Taylor (2010), ‘Healthcare Industry’, Presentation at the Strategic Technologies and Our Global Future Course, Geneva Centre for Security Policy, Switzerland, 15 April.Google Scholar
  18. 47.
    L. Gravitz (2009), ‘TR10: $100 Genome’, Technology Review, March/April, http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?ch=specialsections&s c=tr10&id=22112, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  19. 48.
  20. 49.
  21. 50.
    S. Hensley (2001), ‘Proteins—Not Genes—Could Be Clue to Human Complexity, Disease’, The Wall Street Journal, 13 February, B1.Google Scholar
  22. 51.
  23. 52.
    BIO (2008), Guide to Biotechnology 2008, p. 27.Google Scholar
  24. 53.
    M. Wheelis (2002), ‘Biotechnology and Biochemical Weapons’, The Nonproliferation Review, Vol. IX, No. 1, 50.Google Scholar
  25. 54.
    P. Jenkins (2001), ‘Map of Proteins Holds the Key to Disease’, The Financial Times, 27 November, 6.Google Scholar
  26. 55.
    A. Kalia and R.P. Gupta (2005), ‘Proteomics: A Paradigm Shift’, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, Vol. 25, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 64.
    E. Harrell (2009), ‘The Human Epigenome, Decoded’, Time Magazine, 8 December, http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1945379_1944416_1944420,00.html, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  28. 65.
    J. Cloud (2010), ‘Why Your DNA Isn’t Your Destiny’, Time Magazine, 6 January, http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1951968,00.html, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  29. 72.
    C. Kuppuswamy (2007), The International Legal Governance of the Human Genome (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  30. 76.
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2009), The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2009 (Rome: FAO), ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/012/i0876e/i0876e.pdf, p. 11.Google Scholar
  31. 82.
    K. Harmon (2009), ‘Cracked Corn: Scientists Solve Maize’s Genetic Maze: Boasting More Genes than Humans, the Corn Genome Proved Difficult to Decode’, Scientific American, 19 November, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=corn-genome-cracked, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  32. 86.
    P.S. Anton, R. Silberglitt and J. Schneider (2001), The Global Technology Revolution: Bio/Nano/Materials Trends and their Synergies with Information Technology by 2015 (Santa Monica, CA: RAND), p. 9.Google Scholar
  33. 88.
    P. Collier (2003), ‘The Politics of Hunger’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 6, November/December, 67.Google Scholar
  34. 93.
    J. Pohlhaus and R. Cook-Degan (2008), ‘Genomics Research: World Survey of Public Funding’, BMC Genomics, Vol. 9, 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 95.
    A. Langlois (2006), ‘The Governance of Genomic Information: Will It Come of Age?’, Genomics, Society and Policy, Vol. 2, No. 3, December, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2291236, date accessed 4 September 2010.
  36. 96.
  37. 99.
    E. Dowdeswell, A. Daar, and P. Singer (2003), ‘Bridging the Genomics Divide’, Global Governance, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1.Google Scholar
  38. 100.
    Ibid., p. 3.Google Scholar
  39. 101.
    D. Weisbrot (2009), ‘Rethinking Privacy in the Genetic Age’ in P. Atkinson, P. Glasner and M. Lock (2009), Handbook of Genetics and Society: Mapping the New Genomic Era (New York: Routledge), p. 324.Google Scholar
  40. 103.
    S. McLean (2009), ‘Genetics: Law and Regulation’ in Atkinson et al. (2009), Handbook of Genetics and Society: Mapping the New Genomic Era, p. 267.Google Scholar
  41. 108.
    B. Bogin (2003), ‘The Evolution of Human Nutrition’, The Anthropology of Medicine, December, http://web.archive.org/web/20031203003838/http://citd.scar.utoronto.ca/ANTAO1/Projects/Bogin.html, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  42. 109.
  43. 119.
    R. Martorell (2005), ‘Diabetes and Mexicans: Why the Two Are Linked’, Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy 2, No. 1, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1323307, date accessed 12 August 2010.
  44. 120.

Copyright information

© Nayef R.F. Al-Rodhan 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nayef R. F. Al-Rodhan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.St Antony’s CollegeOxford UniversityUK
  2. 2.Geneva Centre for Security PolicyGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations