Abstract
To my knowledge, there is no comparative study of Thomas Hobbes and Humpty Dumpty. Yet such a study would be illuminating. On the one hand, Humpty and Hobbes met a similar end; as the body of the former broke into many pieces, so the grand theory of the latter was disassembled into smaller and smaller parts in the twentieth century. On the other hand, the causes of the tragedy were very different. Humpty’s fall was an accident that was waiting to happen: he climbed a wall although balance is not an egg’s forte; to their credit, all the King’s horses and all the King’s men tried to put Humpty together again. By contrast, Hobbes’s accident could not have been predicted: it happened at the hands of all the King’s horses and all the King’s men. Indeed, in the last century, legions of game-theorists, analytical philosophers, historians and international theorists dismantled his grand theory, each of them dissecting an aspect, a chapter, a passage, a paragraph, a metaphor, ‘a bit’ of Hobbes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aubrey, J. (1982) Brief Lives, edited by Richard Barber. Wellingborough: Boydell Press.
Bobbio, N. (1993) Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bodin, J. (1992) On Sovereignty, edited and translated by J. Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boucher, D. (1998) Political Theories of International Relations from Thucydides to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, C. W. (1987) ‘Thucydides, Hobbes and the Derivation of Anarchy’, History of Political Thought 8: 33–62.
Hobbes, T. (1839) Elements of Philosophy, vol. I of the English Works of Thomas Hobbes, edited by Sir William Molesworth. London: John Bohn.
Hobbes, T. (1843) The History of the Grecian War Written by Thucydides, vols viii and ix of the English Works of Thomas Hobbes, edited by Sir William Molesworth. London: John Bohn.
Hobbes, T. (1976) Thomas White’s De Mundo Examined, translated from Latin and edited by Harold Whitmore Jones. London: Bradford University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1990) Behemoth, or the Long Parliament. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1991) Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1994a) The Correspondence, vol. I (1622–1657) and vol. ii (16601679) edited by Noel Malcolm. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hobbes, T. (1994b) The Verse Life in Thomas Hobbes, Human Nature and De Corpore Politico, edited by J. C. A. Gaskin, pp. 254–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1998) On the Citizen, edited by R. Tuck and M. Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1991) Kant’s Political Writings, edited by H. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klosko, G. and Rice, D. (1985) ‘Thucydides and Hobbes’s State of Nature’, History of Political Thought 6: 405–9.
Kraynak, R. (1988), International Hobbes Association Newsletter. No. 7: 8–10.
Malcolm, N. (2004) Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Meinecke, F. ([1924] 1957) Machiavellism: The Doctrine of raison d’Etat and its Place in Modern History. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Mintz, S. I. (1962) The Hunting of Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newey, G. (2008) Hobbes and ‘Leviathan’. London: Routledge.
Orr, R. (1989) International Hobbes Association Newsletter. No. 10: 2–5.
Prokhovnik, R. (1991) Rhetoric and Philosophy in Hobbes’s Leviathan. New York: Garland.
Prozorov, S. (2006) ‘Liberal Enmity: The Figure of the Foe in the Political Ontology of Liberalism’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35 (1): 75–100.
Robertson, G. C. (1886) Hobbes. Edinburgh: Blackwood.
Sacksteder, W. (1987) International Hobbes Association Newsletter, No. 6: 6–10.
Schmitt, C. ([1938] 1996) The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Slomp, G. (1990) ‘Hobbes, Thucydides and the Three Greatest Things’, History of Political Thought 11: 565–86.
Slomp, G. (1994) ‘Hobbes and the Equality of Women’, Political Studies 42 (3): 441–52.
Slomp, G. (2000) Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. Houndmills: Macmillan Press; New York: St Martin’s Press.
Slomp, G. (2007a) ‘Kant Against Hobbes: Reasoning and Rhetoric’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2): 208–23.
Slomp, G. (2007b) ‘Hobbes on Glory and Civil Strife’, in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, edited by P. Springborg, pp. 181–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slomp, G. (2008) ‘Introduction’ to Thomas Hobbes, pp. xi-xxvii. Ashgate: Aldershot.
Slomp, G. (2009a) ‘Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt and the Event of Conscription’, Telos, 147: 149–65.
Slomp, G. (2009b) Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Slomp, G. (2010) ‘The Liberal Slip of Thomas Hobbes’s Authoritarian Pen’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2): 357–70.
Sorell, T. (1986) Hobbes. Routledge: London.
Sorell, T. (2006) ‘Hobbes on Trade, Consumption, and International Order’, The Monist 89: 245–58.
Sorell, T. and Foisneau, L. (eds) (2004). Leviathan after 350 Years. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Spragens, T. (1973) The Politics of Motion: The World of Thomas Hobbes. London: Croom Helm.
Strauss, L. ([1936] 1963) The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and its Genesis. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, A. E. (1938) ‘The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes’, Philosophy 13: 406–24.
Tönnies, F. (1925) Thomas Hobbes. Stuttgart: Greven Verlag.
Tuck, R. (1989) Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tuck, R. (1999) The Rights of War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vaughan, C. E. (1925) Studies in the History of Political Philosophy before and After Rousseau (vol 1: From Hobbes to Hume). Manchester: Manchester Press.
Walker R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Warrender, H. ([1957] 1970) The political philosophy of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Watkins, J. ([1965] 1973) Hobbes’s System of Ideas, 2nd edn. London: Hutchinson.
Williams, M. (1996) ‘Hobbes’s Theory of International Relations: A Reconsideration’, International Organisation 50: 213–36.
Williams, M. (2005). The Hobbesian Theory of International Relations: Three Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolin, S. ([1960] 2004) Politics and Vision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Gabriella Slomp
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Slomp, G. (2010). The Politics of Motion and the Motion of Politics. In: Prokhovnik, R., Slomp, G. (eds) International Political Theory after Hobbes. International Political Theory Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304734_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304734_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31687-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30473-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)