Skip to main content

The Politics of Motion and the Motion of Politics

  • Chapter
International Political Theory after Hobbes

Part of the book series: International Political Theory Series ((IPoT))

Abstract

To my knowledge, there is no comparative study of Thomas Hobbes and Humpty Dumpty. Yet such a study would be illuminating. On the one hand, Humpty and Hobbes met a similar end; as the body of the former broke into many pieces, so the grand theory of the latter was disassembled into smaller and smaller parts in the twentieth century. On the other hand, the causes of the tragedy were very different. Humpty’s fall was an accident that was waiting to happen: he climbed a wall although balance is not an egg’s forte; to their credit, all the King’s horses and all the King’s men tried to put Humpty together again. By contrast, Hobbes’s accident could not have been predicted: it happened at the hands of all the King’s horses and all the King’s men. Indeed, in the last century, legions of game-theorists, analytical philosophers, historians and international theorists dismantled his grand theory, each of them dissecting an aspect, a chapter, a passage, a paragraph, a metaphor, ‘a bit’ of Hobbes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aubrey, J. (1982) Brief Lives, edited by Richard Barber. Wellingborough: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, N. (1993) Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, J. (1992) On Sovereignty, edited and translated by J. Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, D. (1998) Political Theories of International Relations from Thucydides to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. W. (1987) ‘Thucydides, Hobbes and the Derivation of Anarchy’, History of Political Thought 8: 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1839) Elements of Philosophy, vol. I of the English Works of Thomas Hobbes, edited by Sir William Molesworth. London: John Bohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1843) The History of the Grecian War Written by Thucydides, vols viii and ix of the English Works of Thomas Hobbes, edited by Sir William Molesworth. London: John Bohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1976) Thomas White’s De Mundo Examined, translated from Latin and edited by Harold Whitmore Jones. London: Bradford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1990) Behemoth, or the Long Parliament. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1991) Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1994a) The Correspondence, vol. I (1622–1657) and vol. ii (16601679) edited by Noel Malcolm. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1994b) The Verse Life in Thomas Hobbes, Human Nature and De Corpore Politico, edited by J. C. A. Gaskin, pp. 254–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1998) On the Citizen, edited by R. Tuck and M. Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1991) Kant’s Political Writings, edited by H. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klosko, G. and Rice, D. (1985) ‘Thucydides and Hobbes’s State of Nature’, History of Political Thought 6: 405–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraynak, R. (1988), International Hobbes Association Newsletter. No. 7: 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, N. (2004) Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. ([1924] 1957) Machiavellism: The Doctrine of raison d’Etat and its Place in Modern History. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. I. (1962) The Hunting of Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey, G. (2008) Hobbes and ‘Leviathan’. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, R. (1989) International Hobbes Association Newsletter. No. 10: 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokhovnik, R. (1991) Rhetoric and Philosophy in Hobbes’s Leviathan. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prozorov, S. (2006) ‘Liberal Enmity: The Figure of the Foe in the Political Ontology of Liberalism’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35 (1): 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. C. (1886) Hobbes. Edinburgh: Blackwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacksteder, W. (1987) International Hobbes Association Newsletter, No. 6: 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. ([1938] 1996) The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (1990) ‘Hobbes, Thucydides and the Three Greatest Things’, History of Political Thought 11: 565–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (1994) ‘Hobbes and the Equality of Women’, Political Studies 42 (3): 441–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (2000) Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. Houndmills: Macmillan Press; New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (2007a) ‘Kant Against Hobbes: Reasoning and Rhetoric’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2): 208–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (2007b) ‘Hobbes on Glory and Civil Strife’, in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, edited by P. Springborg, pp. 181–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (2008) ‘Introduction’ to Thomas Hobbes, pp. xi-xxvii. Ashgate: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (2009a) ‘Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt and the Event of Conscription’, Telos, 147: 149–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (2009b) Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slomp, G. (2010) ‘The Liberal Slip of Thomas Hobbes’s Authoritarian Pen’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2): 357–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T. (1986) Hobbes. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T. (2006) ‘Hobbes on Trade, Consumption, and International Order’, The Monist 89: 245–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T. and Foisneau, L. (eds) (2004). Leviathan after 350 Years. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spragens, T. (1973) The Politics of Motion: The World of Thomas Hobbes. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. ([1936] 1963) The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and its Genesis. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. E. (1938) ‘The Ethical Doctrine of Hobbes’, Philosophy 13: 406–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tönnies, F. (1925) Thomas Hobbes. Stuttgart: Greven Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, R. (1989) Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, R. (1999) The Rights of War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, C. E. (1925) Studies in the History of Political Philosophy before and After Rousseau (vol 1: From Hobbes to Hume). Manchester: Manchester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrender, H. ([1957] 1970) The political philosophy of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J. ([1965] 1973) Hobbes’s System of Ideas, 2nd edn. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (1996) ‘Hobbes’s Theory of International Relations: A Reconsideration’, International Organisation 50: 213–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2005). The Hobbesian Theory of International Relations: Three Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. ([1960] 2004) Politics and Vision. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Gabriella Slomp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slomp, G. (2010). The Politics of Motion and the Motion of Politics. In: Prokhovnik, R., Slomp, G. (eds) International Political Theory after Hobbes. International Political Theory Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304734_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics