Abstract
The last 25 years has seen the introduction and expansion of studies concerning intersectionality (see for instance Crenshaw, 1989; Hill Collins, 1990). Intersectionality is claimed by some authors as a central aspect of feminist thinking, one which has transformed the conceptualisation of gender in research (Shields, 2008). As is well rehearsed, intersectionality theory grew out of a critique of models of inequality which framed social forces as operating in layered or additive ways. Intersectionality can be used as ‘a method for interrogating the institutional reproduction of inequality, whether at the level of the state, the family, or of legal structures more generally’ (Grabham et al., 2009: 2). This more structural form of intersectionality thinking moves analysis away from the individualising approaches that have been criticised by authors such as Conaghan (2009). Such an approach would have purchase in developing understandings of inequality, identity and difference in the area of sexuality; an area which has been relatively neglected within the field of intersectionality studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Beckett, C. (2004) ‘Crossing the Border: Locating Heterosexuality as a Boundary for Lesbian and Disabled Women’, Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3): 44–52.
Berge, B. M. (2000) Action Research for Gender Equity. Maidenhead, Philadelphia: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education.
Bowleg, L. (2008) ‘When Black + Lesbian + Woman =/ Black Lesbian Woman: The Methodological Challenges of Qualitative and Quantitative Research’, Sex Roles 59: 312–25.
Brah, A. and Phoenix, A. (2004) ‘Aint I a Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality’, Journal of International Woman’s Studies, 5(3): 75–86.
Carabine, J. (1995) ‘Invisible Sexualities: Sexuality, Politics, and Influencing Policy Making’, in A. Wilson (ed.) A Simple Matter of Justice? London: Cassell, pp. 91–109.
Carabine, J. (1996a) ‘Heterosexuality and Social Policy’, in D. Richardson (ed.) Theorising Heterosexuality. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 55–74.
Carabine, J. (1996b) ‘A Straight Playing Field of Queering the Pitch? Centring Sexuality in Social Policy’, Feminist Review, 54: 31–64.
Carabine, J. and Monro, S. (2004) ‘Lesbian and Gay Politics and Participation in New Labour’s Britain’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 11(2): 312–27.
Casey, M. (2004) ‘De-Dyking Queer Spaces: Heterosexual Female Visibility in Gay and Lesbian Spaces’, Sexualities, 7: 4: 446–61.
Casey, M. (2007) ‘The Queer Unwanted and Their Undesirable Otherness’, pp. 125–36 in K. Browne, J. Lim and G. Brown (eds) Geographies of Sexualities. London: Ashgate.
Conaghan, J. (2009) ‘Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law’, in E. Grabham, D. Herman, D. Cooper and J. Krishnadas (eds) Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power, and the Politics of Location. Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish, pp. 21–48.
Cooper, D. (1994) Sexing the City: Lesbian and Gay Politics within the Activist State. London: Rivers Oram.
Cooper, D. (1997) ‘Governing Troubles: Authority, Sexuality and Space’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18(4): 501–17.
Cooper, D. and Monro, S. (2003) ‘Governing from the Margins: Queering the State of Local Government’, Contemporary Politics, 9: 229–55.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989) ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Anti-Racist Politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989: 139–67.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1997) ‘Intersectionality and Identity Politics: Learning from Violence against Women of Colour’, in M. Stanley and V. Naryan (eds) Restructuring Feminist Political Theory: Feminist Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 178–93.
Dilworth, R. L. (1998) ‘Action Learning in a Nutshell’, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 11(1): 28–43.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000) Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Fish, J. (2008) ‘Navigating Queer Street: Researching the Intersections of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Identities in Health Research’, Sociological Research Online 13(1) (not paginated).
Grabham, E. Herman, D. Cooper, D. and Krishnadas, J. (2009) ‘Introduction’, in E. Grabham, D. Herman, D. Cooper and J. Krishnadas (eds) Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power, and the Politics of Location. Oxon: Routledge-Cavendish, pp. 1–17.
Hancock, A. M. (2007) ‘Intersectionality as a Normative and Empirical Paradigm’, Politics and Gender 3(2): 248–52.
Hemmings, C. (2002) Bisexual Spaces: A Geography of Sexuality and Gender. London: Routledge.
Hill Collins, P. (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York and London: Routledge.
Hines, S. (2007) TransForming Gender: Transgender Practices of Identity, Intimacy and Care. Bristol: Policy Press.
Hurtado, A. and Sinha, M. (2008) ‘More than Men: Latino Feminist Masculinities and Intersectionality’, Sex Roles 59: 337–49.
Lansley, S., Goss, S. and Woolmar, C. (1989) Councils in Conflict. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
McCall, L. (2005) ‘The Complexity of Intersectionality’, Signs 30(3): 1771–800.
McNiff, J. (1988) Action Research: Principles and Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
Monro, S. (2005) Gender Politics: Activism, Citizenship and Sexual Diversity. London: Pluto Press.
Monro, S. (2006) ‘Sexualities Initiatives in Local Government: Measuring Success’, Local Government Studies, 32(1): 19–39.
Monro, S. (2007a) ‘Transmuting Gender Binaries: The Theoretical Challenge’, Sociological Research Online, 12(1) (not paginated).
Monro, S. (2007b) ‘Transgender: Destabilising Feminisms?’ in V. Munro and C. Stychin (eds) Sexuality and the Law: Feminist Engagements. London: Glasshouse Press, pp. 125–49.
Monro, S. (2007c) ‘New Institutionalism and Sexuality at Work in Local Government’, Gender, Work and Organisation, 14(1): 1–19.
Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds) (2002) The Handbook of Action Research, Participative Inquiry and Practice. London and New Delhi: Sage.
Richardson, D. (2000) Rethinking Sexuality. London: Sage.
Richardson, D. (2004) ‘Locating Sexualities: From Here to Normality’, Sexualities, 7(4): 391–411.
Richardson, D. (2005) ‘Desiring Sameness? The Rise of a Neoliberal Politics of Normalisation’, Antipode, 37(3): 514–34.
Richardson, D. (2007) ‘Patterned Fluidities: (Re)Imagining the Relationship Between Gender and Sexuality’, Sociology, 41(3): 457–74.
Richardson, D., McLaughlin, J. and Casey, M. E. (eds) (2006) Intersections Between Feminist and Queer Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Shields, S. A. (2008) ‘Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective’, Sex Roles, 59: 301–11.
Taylor, Y. (2007) Working Class Lesbian Life: Classed Outsiders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tobin, A. (1990) ‘Lesbianism and the Labour Party: The GLC Experience’, Feminist Review, 34: 56–66.
http://www.stonewall.org.uk Date accessed 18 August 2009.
http://www.pfc.org.uk Date accessed 18 August 2009.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Surya Monro and Diane Richardson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monro, S., Richardson, D. (2010). Intersectionality and Sexuality: The Case of Sexuality and Transgender Equalities Work in UK Local Government. In: Taylor, Y., Hines, S., Casey, M.E. (eds) Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304093_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304093_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31070-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30409-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)