Skip to main content

Bent: Non-Normative Embodiment as Lived Intersectionality

  • Chapter
Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality

Part of the book series: Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences ((GSSS))

Abstract

Intersectionality explores how systems of oppression ‘mutually construct one another’ (Collins, 1998: 63 cited in Bredström, 2006) and, in doing so, challenges universalist analyses of power, inequality, identity and marginalisation. Intersectionality has traditionally been concerned with the ways in which gender, race and social class interact and construct diversities of experience which cannot be fully conceptualised, or properly responded to, by simply ‘adding on’ categories of oppression (Bredström, 2006; Yuval-Davis, 2006; Davis, 2008). In this chapter I explore the ‘other social divisions’ (Yuval-Davis, 2006: 194) of sexuality, disability and mental-health diagnosis/ status through a methodology, or a position, of non-normative embodiment, which also reflects the intersectional project. Kathy Davis describes the methodological imperative of intersectionality as one which embodies ‘a commitment to the situatedness of all knowledge, promising to enhance the theorist’s reflexivity by allowing her to incorporate her own intersectional location in the production of self-critical and accountable feminist theory’ (2008: 71). In this way, intersectionality ‘can — by definition — be employed by any (feminist) scholar willing to use her own social location, whatever it may be, as an analytic resource than just an identity marker’ (2008: 72). In my research I use my own non-normative, queer, disabled and gendered embodiment to interrogate the parallel intersections between the experiences of gender, sexuality (or gendered sexuality/sexualised gender), mental-health diagnosis/status and physical disability — when the latter have visible cues which are read and responded to. Visible or corporeal difference is central to ‘policing and shaming’ (Butler, 1993: 238) by which norms of oppression are reiterated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alexander, N. and Clare, L. (2004) ‘You Still Feel Different: The Experience and Meaning of Women’s Self-Injury in the Context of Lesbian and Bi-Sexual Identity’, Journal of Applied and Community Social Psychology 14: 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrossino, M. V. (1998) Opportunity House: Ethnographic Studies of Mental Retardation. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, G. and Arnold, L. (1997) The Language of Injury. Leicester: BPS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L. (2007) ‘Psychiatric Culture and Bodies of Resistance’, Body and Society 13(2): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, P. and Thomas, P. (2005) Postpsychiatiy: Mental Health in a Postmodern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bredström, A. (2006) ‘Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist HIV/AIDS Research?’ European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 229–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004a) Undoing Gender. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2004b) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (2008) ‘Intersectionality as a Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What makes a Feminist Theory Successful’, Feminist Theory 9(1): 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1995) Reshaping the Female Body: The Dilemma of Cosmetic Surgery. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2003) Performance Ethnography Critical Pedagogy and the Cultural Politics of Culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, N. (1989) ‘Listening with the Body: An Exploration in Counter Transference’, British Journal of Psychotherapy 5(4): 512–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (1995) The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness and Ethics. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garland-Thomson, R. (1997) Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inckle, K. (2005) ‘Who’s Hurting Who? The Ethics of Engaging the Marked Body’, Auto/biography 13(3): 227–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inckle, K. (2006) ‘Off the Straight and Narrow: Or, What Happens When Embodied, Feminist Sociology Meets Queer Ethics’, unpublished seminar paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inckle, K. (2007) Writing on the Body? Thinking Through Gendered Embodiment and Marked Flesh. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inckle, K. (2008) ‘Policing the Body: A Conversation from the Edge of Normative Femininity’, in A. Sparkes (ed.) Auto/Biography Yearbook 2007. Southampton: Cleo Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inckle, K. (2010) ‘Telling Tales? Using Ethnographic Fiction to Speak Embodied Truth’, Qualitative Research 10(1): 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy Bergen, R. (1993) ‘Interviewing Survivors of Marital Rape’, in C. M. Renzetti and R. M. Lee Researching Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LifeSIGNS. (2004) The LifeSIGNS Self-Injury Awareness Booklet: Information for People who Self-Injure/Self-Harm, their Friends, Family Teachers and Healthcare Professionals (UK: LifeSIGNS).

    Google Scholar 

  • NSHN (1996) Cutting the Risk: Self-Harm, Self-Care and Risk Reduction. (Nottingham: NSHN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pembroke, L. R. (1996) Self-Harm: Perspectives from Personal Experience. London: Survivors Speak Out.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, G. (2007) ‘Disordered Boundaries? A Critique of “Borderline Personality Disorder”’ in H. Spandler and S. Warner (eds) Beyond Fear and Control: Working with Young People who Self-Harm. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramet, S. P. (1996) (ed.) Gender Reversals and Gender Culture: Anthropological and Historical Perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, P. (1982) Psycho Politics. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, Tom, Kath Gillespie-Sells and Dominic Davies (1996) The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. London: Cassell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. and Shaw, T. (2007) ‘A Dialogue of Hope and Survival’, in H. Spandler and S. Warner (eds) Beyond Fear and Control: Working with Young People Who Self-Harm. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spandler, H. (1996) Who’s Hurting Who? Young People, Self-Harm, and Suicide. Manchester: 42nd Street.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spandler, H. and Warner, S. (eds) 2007. Beyond Fear and Control: Working with Young People Who Self-Harm. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbugler, A. C., Press, J. E. and Johnson, D. J. (2006) ‘Gender, Race, and Affirmative Action: Operationalizing Intersectionality in Survey Research’, Gender and Society Gender and Society 20(6): 805–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, N. (2002) ‘Fleshy (Dis)figuration, or How to Make the Body Matter’, Critical Psychology: The International Journal of Critical Psychology 5: 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. (2007) The Medicalization of Everyday Life. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ussher, J. (1991) Women’s Madness: Misogyny or Mental Illness? Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. J. and Bendelow, G. (1998) The Lived Body: Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006) ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Kay Inckle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Inckle, K. (2010). Bent: Non-Normative Embodiment as Lived Intersectionality. In: Taylor, Y., Hines, S., Casey, M.E. (eds) Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality. Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304093_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics