Skip to main content

Consumer Rights in Japan

  • Chapter
Japanese Consumer Dynamics

Abstract

The discourse and practice of consumer rights protection are well entrenched in contemporary Japanese society. Japanese consumers have long been known for their exacting standards regarding quality, but they also now increasingly expect diversity and price-competitiveness, with much more access to imported goods and foreign services providers. The consumer voice is expressed not only through what is and is not purchased, but also via claims for redress (for example, for unsafe or non-performing goods) or to terminate contracts (especially for burgeoning types and volumes of services transactions), and through demands for better substantive and procedural law frameworks to operate within. There has been a shift towards boosting private law protections, premised on individual consumers taking the initiative to terminate or withdraw from contracts and – increasingly – to sue for injunctions or damages. This is part of a broader ‘third wave’ of judicial sector reform underway since 2001, aimed at completing the transplantation of a modern Western legal system first begun following the Meiji Restoration of 1868, and boosted by Occupation-era reforms during 1945–51 (Foote [ed.], 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abe, M. and Nottage, L. (2006), ‘Japanese Law’, in Smits, J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, p. 357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. (2006), ‘Japanese Insolvency Law after a Decade of Reform’, Canadian Business Law Journal, 43: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992), Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg (2010), ‘Japan’s Consumer Law to be Enforced Soon’, 21 January, available at http://www.bloombergutv.com/news/latest-world-businessnews/42940/japan-s-consumer-law-to-be-enforced-soon.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, J. (1998), Environmental Politics in Japan: Networks of Power and Protest, Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clammer, J. R. (1997), Contemporary Urban Japan: A Sociology of Consumption, Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1991), ‘Administrative Guidance in Japanese Law: A Threat to the Rule of Law’, Journal of Business Law, JBL, 398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dentsu Institute for Human Studies (2001), ‘Value Changes with Globalization – Japan Remains Groping, Asia Takes an Opportunity – the Fifth “Comparative Analysis of Global Values” ’, Tokyo: Dentsu Institute for Human Studies, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dernauer, M. (2006), Verbraucherschutz und Vertragsfreiheit im japanischen Recht[Consumer Protection and Freedom of Contract in Japan], Tuebingen: MohrSiebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberts, R. E. and Eberts, C. G. (1995), The Myths of Japanese Quality, Upper SaddleRiver, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, K. and McCoy, P. (2002), ‘A Tale of Three Markets: The Law and Economics of Predatory Lending’, Texas Law Review, 80: 1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, E. A. (2000), The Ritual of Rights in Japan: Law, Society and Health Policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foote, D. H. (ed.) (2007), Law in Japan: A Turning Point, Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujioka, B. (1998), ‘ “Shohisha Keiyakuho (Kasho) no Gutaiteki Naiyo ni tsuite” no Gaiyo [Overview of the Concrete Contents of the Tentatively-Entitled Consumer Contracts Law]’, New Business Law (NBL), 16 (636).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresser, J., Koichiro, F. and Akio, M. (1981), Environmental Law in Japan, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. O. (1978), ‘The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 4: 359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino, E. (1991), ‘Gendai Keiyaku Ho Ron - Yakkan, Shohisha Keiyaku wo Kien to shite [Contemporary Contract Law Theory – Reconsidered in the Light of Standard Form and Consumer Contracts]’, New Business Law (NBL), 1 (469).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibusuki, M. and Nottage, L. (2002), ‘IT and Legal Practice and Education in Japan and Australia’, UTS Law Review, 4: 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomura, T. (1993), ‘Verbraucherschutz und neue Aufgaben des Vertragsrechts in Japan [Consumer Protection and New Tasks for Contract Law in Japan]’, 27 Kobe University Law Rev 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, S., Chizuko, M., Iwakazu, T. and Suzuki, M. (2006), Tekisutobukku Shohisha [Consumer Law Textbook], Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982), MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2007), ‘Escaping Your Debts in Japan: Hiroyuki Yagi and Masakazu Kaji, Karita Kane Wa Kaesuna [Book Review]’, Journal of Japanese Law, 12: 259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussaume, R. and Judson, J. H. (1992), ‘Public Perceptions About Food Safety in the United States and Japan’, Rural Sociology, 57(2): 235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadomatsu, N. (1999), ‘The New Administrative Information Disclosure Law in Japan’, Zeitschrift fuer Japanisches Recht, 8: 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, M. and Nottage, L. (2008), ‘Contract Law’, in CCH Japanese Business Law: Volume 1, Singapore: CCH Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima, T. (1963), ‘Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan’, in von Mehren, A. (ed.), Law in Japan: The Legal Order in a Changing Society, Harvard: Harvard University Press, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawawa, N. (2010), ‘Japanese Consumer Law and a Duty to Supply Information’, International Journal of Private Law, 3(1–2): 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerbo, H. R. and McKinstry, J. A. (1995), Who Rules Japan? The Inner Circles of Economic and Political Power, Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, J. (2004), Japan’s Quiet Transformation: Social Change and Civil Society in the Twenty-First Century, London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, T. and Nottage, L. (2007), ‘Globalization of Japanese Corporations and the Development of Corporate Legal Departments: Problems and Prospects’, in Alford, W. (ed.), Raising the Bar, Cambridge, MA: Harvard East Asian Legal Studies Program (distributed by Harvard University Press), p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Z. (1999), ‘Contract Law in General’, in Z Kitagawa (ed.), Doing Business in Japan, New York: Matthew Bender, looseleaf, §1.07[4][b].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, Z. (1985), ‘Unfair Contract Terms in Administrative Guidance’, Rechtstheorie, 16: 181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozuka, S. (2009), ‘Judicial Activism of the Supreme Court in Consumer Law: Juridification of Society through Case Law?’, Journal of Japanese Law, 27: 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozuka, S. (2010), ‘Punishing the Lenders for Whose Sake? Impact of the New Case Law and Follow-ups to the 2006 Reform of Consumer Credit Regulation in Japan’, in Backert, W., Block-Lieb, S. and Niemi, J. (eds), Contemporary Issues in Consumer Insolvency, Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozuka, S. and Nottage, L. (2009a), ‘Re-Regulating Unsecured Consumer Credit in Japan: Over-Indebted Borrowers, the Supreme Court, and New Legislation’, in Twigg-Flessner, C., Parry, D. and Nordhausen, A. (eds), Yearbook of Consumer Law 2009, Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozuka, S. and Nottage, L. (2009b), ‘The Myth of the Careful Consumer: Law, Culture, Economics and Politics in the Rise and Fall of Unsecured Lending in Japan’, in Niemi-Kiesilainen, J., Ramsay, I. and Whitford, W. (eds), Consumer Credit, Debt and Bankruptcy: Comparative and International Perspectives, Oxford: Hart, p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, P. E. (1999), Green Politics in Japan, London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, M., Nakayama, S. and Yoshioka, H. (1999), Science, Technology and Society in Contemporary Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, G. (2001), The Emptiness of Japanese Affluence, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreery, J. L. (2000), Japanese Consumer Behaviour: From Worker Bees to Wary Shoppers: An Anthropologist Reads Research by the Hakuhodo Institute of Life and Living, Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclachlan, P. (2002), Consumer Politics in Postwar Japan, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. J. (2002), ‘Credit Cards and Debit Cards in the United States and Japan’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 55: 1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. J. (2006), Charging Ahead: The Growth and Regulation of Payment Card Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. J. (2007), ‘Bankruptcy Reform and The “Sweat Box” Of Credit Card Debt’, University of Illinois Law Review, p. 375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. J. and Hawkins, J. (2007), ‘Just until Payday’, UCLA Law Review, 54: 855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, T. (1994), ‘EC Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts and Japan: Does Japanese Law Meet the Standards Set by the Directive?’, Consumer Law Journal, 2: 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, T. (2002), ‘Privatization of Consumer Law: Current Developments and Features of Consumer Law in Japan at the Turn of the Century’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics, 30: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuura, I. (2001), ‘Product Liability Law and Japanese-Style Dispute Resolution’, University of British Columbia Law Review, 35(1): 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milhaupt, C. J. and West, M. D. (2004), Economic Organizations and Corporate Governance in Japan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milhaupt, C. J. and Pistor, K. (2008), Law and Capitalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moehwald, U. (2000), ‘Trends in Value Change in Contemporary Japan’ in Eades, J.S., Gill, T., and Befu, H. (eds) Globalization and Social Change in Contemporary Japan, 55, Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, M. (1998), ‘Machiavellian Politics and Japanese Ideals: The Enigma of Japanese Power Eight Years Later’, Japan Policy Research Institute Paper, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda, Y. and Angelo, A. H. (1976), Introduction to Japanese Law, Tokyo; Forest Grove, OR: University of Tokyo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2005b), ‘Japan’’, in CCH Doing Business in Asia looseleaf, Singapore: CCH Asia, Singapore, para JPN ¶30-011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (1996), ‘Form and Substance in US, English, New Zealand and Japanese Law: A Framework for Better Comparisons of Developments in the Law of Unfair Contracts’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 26: 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2002), Form, Substance and Neo-Proceduralism in Comparative Contract Law: The Law in Books and the Law in Action in England, New Zealand, Japan and the US, PhD Thesis, Law Faculty, Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2004a), Product Safety and Liability Law in Japan: From Minamata to Mad Cows, London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2004b), ‘Convergence, Divergence, and the Middle Way in Unifying or Harmonising Private Law’, Annual of German and European Law, 1: 166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2005a), ‘Comparing Product Liability and Safety in Japan: From Minamata to Mad Cows to Mitsubishi’, in Fairgrieve, D. (ed.), Product Liability in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 334.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2005c), ‘Redirecting Japan’s Multi-Level Governance’, in Hopt, K. J., Wymeersch, E., Kanada, H. and Baum, H. (eds), Corporate Governance in Context: Corporations, State, and Markets in Europe, Japan, and the US, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2006), ‘The ABCs of Product Safety Re-Regulation in Japan: Asbestos, Buildings, Consumer Electrical Goods, and Schindler’s Lifts’, Griffith Law Review, 15(2): 242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2007), ‘Product Liability and Safety Regulation’, in McAlinn, G. (ed.), Japanese Business Law, The Hague: Kluwer, p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2008), ‘Product Safety Regulation Reform in Australia and Japan: Harmonising Towards European Models?’, Yearbook of Consumer Law, 2: 429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2009), ‘Consumer Law Reform in Australia: Contemporary and Comparative Constructive Criticism’, Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 9(2): 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2010a), ‘Japan’ in duPlessis, J, Hargovan, A. and Bagaric M., Principles of Corporate Governance, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. (2010b), ‘Proposed Australian (and Canadian) Requirements to Disclose Consumer Product Related Accidents: Better Late Than Never?’ Sydney Law School Research Paper, 10/41: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1600502.

  • Nottage, L. and Kano, H. (2009), ‘Japan’, in Kellam, J. (ed.), Product Liability in the Asia-Pacific, Sydney: Federation Press, p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. and Rheuben, J. (2008), ‘Chinese Dumplings and Dodgy Foods in Japan: Implications for the Australia-Japan Free Trade Agreement’, Australian Product Liability Reporter, 19(4): 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. and Trezise, M. (2003), ‘Mad Cows and Japanese Consumers’, Australian Product Liability Reporter, 14: 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L. and Wada, Y. (1998), ‘Japan’s New Product Liability ADR Centers: Bureaucratic, Industry, or Consumer Informalism?’ Zeitschrift fuer Japansiches Recht, 6: 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottage, L., Wolff, L. and Anderson, K. (eds) (2008), Corporate Governance in the 21st Century: Japan’s Gradual Transformation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omura, A. (1998), Shohishaho [Consumer Law], Tokyo: Yuhikaku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardieck, A. (2008), ‘Japan and the Moneylenders: Activist Courts and Substantive Justice’, Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 17(3): 529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Port, K. L. and McAlinn, G. P. (2003), Comparative Law: Law and the Legal Process in Japan, Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramseyer, J. M. and Nakazato, M. (1999), Japanese Law: An Economic Approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiber, H. and Mayali, L. (eds) (2007), Emerging Concepts of Rights in Japanese Law, Berkeley: UC Berkeley – Robbins Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoppa, L. J. (1997), Bargaining with Japan: What American Pressure Can and Cannot Do, New York; Chichester: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘ “ShohishakeiyakuhoHoan Teishutsu Miokuri [Presenting a Draft Law on Consumer Contracts Set Back]’, Nihon Keizai Shimbun, 10 March 1999, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suda, S. (2006), Karyugui – Shohisha Kinyu No Jittai [The Reality of the Consumer Finance Foodchain], Tokyo: Takuma Shinsho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanase, T. (2010), Law and the Community: A Critical Assessment of American Liberalism and Japanese Modernity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tani, M. (2009), ‘Consumer Policy 2009’, RIETI Policy Updates, 36, http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/special/policy-update/036.html

    Google Scholar 

  • TAPALS (ed.) (2006), TAPALS Hakusho [White Paper] 2006, Tokyo: TAPALS [Shohisha Kinyu Renrakukai].

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V. (1993), ‘Continuing Transactions and Persistent Myths: Contracts in Contemporary Japan’, Melbourne University Law Review, 19: 352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, V. (1997), ‘Consumer Contract Governance in a Deregulating Japan’, VUWLR, 27: 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upham, F. (1987), Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wolferen, K. (1989), The Enigma of Japanese Power: People and Politics in a Stateless Nation, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1992), ‘Consumer Protection and Protectionism in Japan’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 18(1): 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, S. K. (1999) ‘When Interests Are Not Preferences – The Cautionary Tale of Japanese Consumers’, Comparative Politics, 31: 187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. (1984), ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Guidance: Governmentally Encouraged Consensual Dispute Resolution in Japan’, Columbia Law Review, 84: 924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweigert, K. and Kötz, H. (1998), Introduction to Comparative Law, Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Luke Nottage

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nottage, L. (2011). Consumer Rights in Japan. In: Haghirian, P. (eds) Japanese Consumer Dynamics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302228_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics