Skip to main content

Human-Asset Essentiality and Corporate Social Capital in a Stakeholders-Society Perspective

  • Chapter
  • 1333 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

It is well known that an important conceptual issue was first raised in a seminal debate between Dodd and Bearle in the early 1930s regarding whether the corporation is the property of the stockholders, or if the board should owe fiduciary duties to the stakeholders in general. To date it does not seem that this issue has been resolved. One view became more powerful and prevalent at one time, but then its influence relatively declined in response to public opinion, emergent economic environments and business landscape, particular events (such as the Asian financial crisis and the Enron scandal) and so on. Recently the stakeholders-society view seems to be somewhat regaining its momentum. There seems to be two important factors for this. One is the rising importance of human knowledge assets for corporate competitiveness in spite of, or rather because of, the development of digital information technology. The other is the rising public awareness of the values of natural environments which corporate activities are embedded in, as well as exert significant impacts on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alchian, A. and H. Demsetz (1950) ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review, vol. 62, pp. 777–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (1984) The Cooperative Game Theory of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2007a) ‘Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. (2007b) ‘Linking Economic and Social Exchange Games: From the Community Norm to CSR’, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1031555.

  • Aoki, M. (2007c) ‘Three-level Approach to the Rules of Societal Games’, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M., G. Jackson and H. Miyajima (eds) (2007) Corporate Governance in Japan: Organizational Diversity and Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M., and G. Jackson (2008) ‘Understanding an Emerging Diversity of Corporate Governance and Organizational Architecture: An Essentially-based Analysis’, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 17(1), pp. 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, M. and H. Takizawa (2002) ‘Information, Incentives, and Option Value: The Silicon-Valley Model’, Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 30, pp. 759–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C.Y. and K.B. Clark (2001) ‘Capabilities and Capital Investment: New Perspectives on Capital Budgeting’, in D.H. Chew (ed.), The New Corporate Finance: Where Theory Meets Practice. New York: McGraw Hill Irwin, pp. 117–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M., and L. Stout (1999) ‘A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law’, Virginia Law Review, vol. 85, pp. 247–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1981) ‘Men and Machines’, in K. Knorr-Cetina and A.V. Cicourel (eds), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro Sociologies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 304–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986) ‘The Forms of Capital’, in J. Richarson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and L.J.D. Wacquant (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., S. Hart and B. Yeung (2000) ‘Do Corporate Global Enviromental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?’, Management Science, vol. 46, pp. 1059–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. (1995) Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayami, Y. (2006) ‘Social Capital, Human Capital and Community Mechanism: Toward a Consensus among Economists’, draft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. (2005) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: An Economic and Financial Framework’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance — Issues and Practice, vol. 30(3), pages 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. (1979) ‘Moral Hazard and Observability’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, pp. 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S.N. and P. Stromberg (2003) ‘Financial Contracting Theory Meets the Real World: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Capital Contracts’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 70, pp. 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A.A. and M.J. Lennox (2001) ‘Does It Really Pay To Be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 5(1), pp. 105–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, R. G., and L. Zingales (2000) ‘The Governance of the New Enterprises’, in X. Vives (ed.), Corporate Governance: Theoretical & Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny (1997) ‘A Survey of Corporate Governance’, Journal of Finance, vol. 52, pp. 737–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (1997) ‘German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive?’, in C. Crouch and W. Streeck (eds), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism. London: Sage, pp. 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aoki, M. (2011). Human-Asset Essentiality and Corporate Social Capital in a Stakeholders-Society Perspective. In: Sacconi, L., Blair, M., Freeman, R.E., Vercelli, A. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302112_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics