Abstract
Relations between subaltern groups and the state have received substantial attention in recent scholarly work on India’s changing political economy.1 Here, I seek to focus on the arguments made in recent work by Stuart Corbridge and John Harriss. In contrast to perspectives which posit the state as existing for subaltern groups only as a negative source of oppression, and conceive of oppositional politics as deriving from cultures of subaltern otherness, Corbridge and Harriss maintain that the institutions, practices and discourses of the Indian state are at the heart of emancipatory politics in India today (Corbridge and Harriss, 2000; Fuller and Harriss, 2001; Corbridge et al., 2005).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, P. (1988). ‘Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State’, Journal of Historical Sociology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 58–89.
Bardhan, P. (1998). The Political Economy of Development in India: Expanded Edition (Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Baviskar, A. (1995). In the Belly of the River: Tribal Conflicts over Water in the Narmada Valley (Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Baviskar, A. and Sundar, N. (2008). ‘Democracy Versus Economic Transformation?’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 43, No. 46, 87–9.
Bose, S. (1997). ‘Instruments and Idioms of Colonial and National Development: India’s Experience in Comparative Perspective’, in F. Cooper and R. Packard (eds), International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press): 45–63.
Byres, T. J. (1981). ‘The New Technology, Class Formation and Class Action in the Indian Countryside’, Journal ofPeasant Studies, Vol. 8, No. 4, 405–54.
Cammack, P. (1990). ‘Statism, New Institutionalism and Marxism’, Socialist Register 1990, 147–70.
Chandrasekhar, C. P. and Ghosh, J. (2002). The Market that Failed: A Decade of Neoliberal Reforms in India (New Delhi: Leftword).
Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Chatterjee, P. (1993). The Nation and its Fragments (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Chatterjee, P. (2004). Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World (New York: Columbia University Press).
Chatterjee, P. (2008). ‘Democracy and Economic Transformation’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 43, No. 46, 53–62.
Chibber, V. (2003). Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Chibber, V. (2005). ‘Reviving the Developmental State: The Myth of the National Bourgeoisie’, Socialist Register 2005, 226–46.
Corbridge, S. (2007). ‘The (Im)Possibility of Development Studies’, Economy and Society, Vol. 36, No. 2, 179–221.
Corbridge, S. and Harriss, J. (2000). Reinventing India: Liberalization, Hindu Nationalism and Popular Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivastava, M. and Veron, R. (2005). Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Desai, M. (2007). State Formation and Radical Democracy in India, 1860–1990 (London: Routledge).
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Evans, P. B. (1979). Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Foucault, M. (1976). Discipline and Punish: Birth of the Prison (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (London: Pantheon).
Foucault, M. (1998). History ofSexuality: An Introduction (London: Vintage).
Frankel, F. (2005). India’s Political Economy: The Gradual Revolution 1947–2004 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Fuller, C.J. and Harriss, J. (2001). ‘For an Anthropology of the Modern Indian State’, in C. J. Fuller and V. Bene! (eds), The Everyday State and Society in Modern India (London: Hurst and Company): 1–30.
Geoghegan, M. and Cox, L. (2001). ‘Outside the Whale: (Re)thinking Social Movements and the Voluntary Sector’, paper available at from www.iol.ie/~mazzoldi/ toolsforchange.
Gupta, A. (1995). ‘Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State’, American Ethnologist, Vol. 22, No. 2, 375–402.
Hall, S. (1983). ‘Notes on Deconstructing “the Popular”’, in R. Samuel (ed.), People’s History and Socialist Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul): 227–39.
Hansen, T. B. (2001). ‘Governance and Myths of State in Mumbai’, in C. J. Fuller and V. Bene! (eds), The Everyday State and Society in Modern India (London: Hurst and Company).
Harriss-White, B. (2003). India Working: Essays on Society and Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Heller, P. (1999). The Labour of Development: Workers and the Transformation of Capitalism in Kerala (Cornell, NY: Cornell University Press).
Heller, P. (2005). ‘Reinventing Public Power in the Age of Globalization: Decentralization and the Transformation of Movement Politics in India’, in R. Ray and M. F. Katzenstein (eds), Social Movements in India: Poverty, Power and Politics (Lanham, MD: Rowan and Little): 79–106.
Jessop, B. (1982). The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods (Oxford: Martin Robertson).
Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Jessop, B. (2008). State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Kala, P. (2001). ‘In the Spaces of Erasure: Globalisation, Resistance and Narmada River’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 36, No. 22, 1991–2002.
Kamat, S. (2002). Development Hegemony: NGOs and the State in India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Katzenstein, M. and Ray, R. (2005). ‘And in the Beginning there was the Nehruvian State’, in R. Ray and M. F. Katzenstein (eds), Social Movements in India: Poverty, Power, and Politics (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefeld).
Kaviraj, S. (1997). ‘A Critique of the Passive Revolution’, in P. Chatterjee (ed.), State and Politics in India (Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Kiely, R. (1999). ‘The Last Refuge of the Noble Savage: A Critical Assessment of Post- Development Theory’, European Journal of Development Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, 30–55.
Markovits, C. (1985). Indian Business and Nationalist Politics 1931–39 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Marx, K. (1984). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon (London: Lawrence and Wishart).
Mies, M. and Shiva, V. (1987). Ecofeminism (London: Verso).
Mitchell, T. (1991). ‘The Limits of the State: Beyond Statist Approaches and their Critics’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 1, 77–96.
Moore, D. S. (1996). ‘Marxism, Culture, and Political Ecology: Environmental Struggles in Zimbabwe’s Eastern Highlands’, in R. Peet and M. Watts (eds), Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements (London: Routledge): 125–47.
Moore, D. S. (1998). ‘Subaltern Struggles and the Politics of Place: Remapping Resistance in Zimbabwe’s Eastern Highlands’, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1–38.
Moore, D. S. (2000). ‘The Crucible of Cultural Politics: Reworking “Development” in Zimbabwe’s Eastern Highlands’, American Ethnologist, Vol. 26, No. 3, 654–89.
Moore, D. S. (2003). ‘Beyond Blackmail: Multivalent Modernities and the Cultural Politics of Development in India’, in K. Sivaramakrishnan and A. Agrawal (eds), Regional Modernities: The Cultural Politics of Development in India (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press): 165–214.
Mukherjee, A. (2002). Imperialism, Nationalism and the Making of the Indian Capitalist Class 1920–1947 (New Delhi: Sage Publications).
Nilsen, A. G. (2007). ‘On New Social Movements and “the Reinvention of India”’, Forum for Development Studies, Vol. 2, 271–93.
Nilsen, A. G. (2008). ‘Political Economy, Social Movements and State Power: A Marxian Perspective on Two Decades of Resistance to the Narmada Dam Projects’, Journal of Historical Sociology, Vol. 21, No. 2–3, 303–30.
Nilsen, A. G. (2009). ‘Autonome Domener eller Relasjonelle Praksiser: Makt og Motstand i Indisk Historie og Samtid’, Agora, Vol. 1, 126–65.
Nilsen, A. G. (2010). Dispossession and Resistance in India: The River and the Rage (London: Routledge).
Parajuli, P. (1991). ‘Power and Knowledge in Development Discourse: New Social Movements and the State in India’, International Social Science Journal, Vol. 127, 173–90.
Parajuli, P. (1996). ‘Ecological Ethnicity in the Making: Developmentalist Hegemonies and Emergent Identities in India’, Identities, Vol. 3, 15–59.
Pieterse, J. N. (1998). ‘My Paradigm or Yours? Alternative Development, Post- Development, Reflexive Development’, Development and Change, Vol. 29, No. 2, 343–73.
Pieterse, J. N. (2000). ‘After Post-Development’, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, 171–95.
Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, Power, Socialism (London: Verso).
Przeworski, A. (1986). Capitalism and Social Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Rangan, H. (2000). Of Myths and Movements: Rewriting Chipko into Himalayan History (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Roy, A. (2009). ‘This Land is Mine’, Outlook, 9 November.
Rudolph, L. I. and Rudolph, S. (1987). In Pursuit ofLakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
Sarkar, S. (1983). Modern India, 1885–1947 (New Delhi: Macmillan).
Sarkar, S. (1998). Writing Social History (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
Sewell, W. H. (1992). ‘A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 98, No. 1, 1–29.
Sewell, W. H. (1996). ‘Historical Events as Transformation of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille’, Theory and Society, Vol. 25, No. 6, 841–81.
Sharma, A. (2008). Logics of Empowerment: Development, Gender and Governance in India (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
Sinha, S. (2003). ‘Development Counter-Narratives: Taking Social Movements Seriously’, in K. Sivaramakrishnan and A. Agrawal (eds), Regional Modernities: The Cultural Politics of Development in India (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press): 286–312.
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Steinberg, M. W. (1999). ‘The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse Among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinners’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 3, 736–80.
Yadav, Y. (2000). ‘Understanding the Second Democratic Upsurge: Trends of Bahujan Participation in Electoral Politics in the 1990s’, in F. Frankel, Z. Hasan, R. Bhargava and B. Arora (eds), Transforming India: Social and Political Dynamics of Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 120–45.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nilsen, A.G. (2011). ‘Not Suspended in Mid-Air’: Critical Reflections on Subaltern Encounters with the Indian State. In: Motta, S.C., Nilsen, A.G. (eds) Social Movements in the Global South. Rethinking International Development Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302044_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302044_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31843-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30204-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)