Abstract
This chapter focuses on the overall question of to what extent the British government preferred the EU to be responsible for different aspects of military planning. The United Kingdom represents a great challenge in this context since there was a tremendous shift between the mid-1990s and the Convention. While France and to some degree Germany maintained their traditional positions, it was the UK’s subscription to the ESDP that made the declaration of St Malo in 1998 such a ‘sea change’ (Whitman 1999: 5–9; Heisbourg 2000a: 8–9; Posen 2006: 167–8). Its underlying aim was to increase Europe’s military capability for different forms of crisis management.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Moritz Weiss
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weiss, M. (2011). Great Britain — From Opposing the Union towards a Subordinated ESDP. In: Transaction Costs and Security Institutions. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230301986_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230301986_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32727-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30198-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)