Advertisement

The Hindi Horror Film: Notes on the Realism of a Marginal Genre

  • Valentina Vitali

Abstract

Indian cinemas have not produced horror films except for a short period, between the late 1970s and the early 1990s, when the genre saw a brief moment of glory with the horror films made by the Ramsay family of filmmakers. The family consists of the seven sons of F.U. Ramsay (1917–89), a radio manufacturer and producer, of whom Kumar, Shyam, Keshu, Tulsi, Gangu and Kiran are actively associated with film and, from the early 1990s, with television (Rajadhyaksha and Willemen 1999: 191). Most of the Ramsay films were directed by the Tulsi and Shyam team, with Kiran, the youngest, in charge of sound. Their films never occupied the centre ground of cinema in India. Like much horror cinema elsewhere, they were cheaply produced films that circulated at the margins of the industry. Even so, the Ramsay brothers’ films stand out in the history of Hindi and, indeed, of Indian cinemas as a unique moment: although their success in a niche market for just over a decade led other filmmakers such as Mohan Bhakri and Vinod Talwar to experiment with the genre, in practice, the Ramsay brothers’ productions constitute a single instance of horror cinema in India. Nothing like it had been made before and nothing similar was made afterwards. The question I want to explore here is: what made these films possible, even necessary, during the 1980s in India and only then?

Keywords

Frontal Mode Indian Cinema Congress Party Indian History Narrative Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay, S. (1993) Indian Cinema: Contemporary Perceptions from the Thirties. Jamshedpur: Celluloid Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chandra, B. (2003) In the Name of Democracy: JP Movement and the Emergency. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Chatterjee, P. (1986) Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chibber, V. (2004) Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India. New Delhi: Tulika Books.Google Scholar
  5. Das, V. (1980) ‘The Mythological Film and its Framework of Meaning: An Analysis of Jai Santoshi Ma’, India International Centre Quarterly, 8(1), 43–56.Google Scholar
  6. Dasgupta, C. (1989) ‘Seeing and Believing, Science and Mythology: Notes on the Mythological Genre’, Film Quarterly, 42(4), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desai, M. (1975) ‘India: Emerging Contradictions of Slow Capitalist Development’, in R. Blackburn (ed.), Explosion in a Subcontinent. Harmondsworth: Penguin, in association with New Left Review, pp. 11–50.Google Scholar
  8. Desai, M. (2002) Marx’s Revenge: The Resurgence of Capitalism and the Death of Statist Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Desai, M. (2004) Nehru’s Hero: Dilip Kumar in the Life of India. New Delhi: Roli Books.Google Scholar
  10. Dwyer, R. (2005) Filming the Gods: Religion and Indian Cinema. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Harding, F. (2007) ‘Appearing Fabu-lous: From Tender Romance to Horrifying Sex’, Filmint, 5(4), 10–19.Google Scholar
  12. Hughes, S.P. (1996a) ‘Is There Anyone Out There? Exhibition and the Formation of Silent Film Audiences in South India’, unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Hughes, S.P. (1996b) ‘The Pre-Phalke Era in South Asia: Reflections on the Formation of Film Audiences in Madras’, South Asian Studies (July–December), 161–204.Google Scholar
  14. Kapur, G. (1987) ‘Mythic Material in Indian Cinema’, Journal of Arts and Ideas, 14–15, 79–109.Google Scholar
  15. Kapur, G. (1993) ‘Revelation and Doubt: Sant Tukaram and Devi’, in T. Niranjana, P. Sudhir and V. Dhareshwar (eds), Interrogating Modernity: Culture and Colonialism in India. Calcutta: Seagull Books, pp. 19–46.Google Scholar
  16. Lele, J. (1995) ‘Saffronisation of Shiv Sena: Political Economy of City, State, Nation’, Economic and Political Weekly (24 June), 1520–8.Google Scholar
  17. Lutgendorf, P. (2003) ‘Jai Santoshi Maa Revisited’, in S.B. Plate (ed.), Representing Religion in World Cinema: Filmmaking, Mythmaking, Culture Making. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 14–42.Google Scholar
  18. McKeon, M. (1987) The Origins of the English Novel 1600–1740. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mukherjee, M. (1984) Realism and Reality: The Novel and Society in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Prasad, M.M. (1998a) ‘Back to the Present’, Cultural Dynamics, 10(2), 123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prasad, M.M. (1998b) Ideology of the Hindi Film: A Historical Construction. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rajadhyaksha, A. (1986) ‘Neo-Traditionalism: Film as Popular Art in India’, Framework, 32–33, 20–67.Google Scholar
  23. Rajadhyaksha, A. (1987) ‘The Phalke Era: Conflict of Traditional Form and Modern Technology’, Journal of Arts and Ideas, 14–15, 47–78.Google Scholar
  24. Rajadhyaksha, A. and Willemen, P. (eds) (1999) Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema, revised edn. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Report of the Film Enquiry Committee (1951). New Delhi: Government of India Press.Google Scholar
  26. Todorov, T. (1973) The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Vanaik, A. (1990) The Painful Transition: Bourgeois Democracy in India. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Vanaik, A. (1997) The Furies of Indian Communalism: Religion, Modernity and Secularization. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Vasudevan, R.S. (1993) ‘Shifting Codes, Dissolving Identities: The Hindi Social Film of the 1950s as Popular Culture’, Journal of Arts and Ideas, 23–24, 51–79.Google Scholar
  30. Vitali, V. (2006) ‘On the Frontal Subjects of the Hindi Melodrama: Notes for a Comparative Approach to Film’, Boundary 2, 33(2), 159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Valentina Vitali 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentina Vitali

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations