Advertisement

Law through a Hybrid Genre in Solomon’s Choice: A Case Study of a Reflection on Law Education through Television in Korea

  • Ji Yun Park

Abstract

The three public Korean television stations (KBS, MBC and SBS) categorize their programmes into ‘news’, ‘drama’,1 ‘entertainment’,2 ‘education/general culture’ or ‘information/current issues’3 and ‘sports’. However, a considerable number of programmes raise questions as to what genre they might belong to, as many of them mix two or three genres: ‘drama’ with ‘entertainment’, ‘entertainment’ with ‘education/information’, and even ‘drama’ with ‘entertainment’ and ‘education’. Sometimes, the official objective of the programme — be it informing, entertaining or educating — is intermingled with the form of the programme to the extent that it can generate some confusion as to its intention. Programmes of a ‘hybrid’ genre are abundant in Korean television and constitute one of its specificities. They are products of a creative exploitation of the properties and characteristics of television: its extremely codified nature, the conventions of which can be changed and reinvented infinitely. This strategy of mixing genres is exploited to the full in programmes categorized as ‘education’. Some programmes explicitly and specifically intend to educate audiences in one professional domain in particular while utilizing the form of entertainment. They exploit conventions traditionally used in entertainment programmes, such as the use of celebrities as emcees and participants, quizzes and games, a humorous atmosphere, colourful settings and music.

Keywords

Legal Knowledge Legal Information Teaching Foreign Language Final Verdict Legal World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R.C. (ed.) (1992) Channels of Discourse, Reassembled: Television and Contemporary Criticism. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  2. Fiske, J. (1991) Television Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Gattegno, C. (1972) Teaching Foreign Languages in Schools. New York: Educational Solutions.Google Scholar
  4. Gattegno, C. (1976) The Common Sense of Teaching Foreign Languages. New York: Educational Solutions.Google Scholar
  5. Kang, T.-Y. and Yun, T.-J. (2002) A History of TV Entertainment Programmes in Korea. Seoul: Hanul.Google Scholar
  6. Kim, J.-J. (2004) A Study of the Use of Television by Korean Television Audiences and its Effects. Seoul: Communication Books.Google Scholar
  7. Kim, J. (2006) Korean Legal Culture: Understanding, Structure and Change. Kyunggi do: Nanam edition.Google Scholar
  8. Ministry of Justice (2005) Korean Citizens’ Awareness of Law, in the Perspective of Promoting Law Education. Seoul: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  9. Ministry of Justice (2006) Perspectives of Improvement of Law-Related Education in Korea. Seoul: Commission of Research on Law-Related Education.Google Scholar
  10. Yun, Y.-W. (2007) ‘Law! An Invitation to Everyday Life’, Law is My Friend, 1, 18–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ji Yun Park 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji Yun Park

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations