Skip to main content
  • 101 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of a return of theory might give readers pause. When, if at all, did use and development of theory in early modern English literary-cultural studies decline? With the exception of new materialist, post humanist, and some performance-oriented work, as well as the combined social theory, performance aesthetics, and critical methodology of transversal poetics, the field has suffered a waning interest in theoretically driven approaches that began during the mid-1990s. The radical drop in positions advertised in the MLA Job List for which an emphasis in theory was a primary criterion, the emergence of a large community of scholars whose focus was the history of the book, editing, or philology, and the widespread popularity of Harold Bloom’s liberal-humanist account of Shakespeare’s genius all exemplified this lag.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. William Flesch, Comeuppance: Costly Signaling, Altruistic Punishment, and other Biological Components of Fiction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution (New York: Bloomsbury, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brian Boyd, On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maryanne Wolf, Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain (New York: Harper, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jean Howard and Marion F. O’Connor, Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology (London: Methuen, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cited in Bradd Shore, Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), 32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Steven Pinker, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (New York: Penguin Books, 2002), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert Boyd and Peter J. Richerson, The Origin and Evolution of Cultures (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 104.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michael Tomasello, The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For an example of work along these lines, see Andrew Newberg, Why God Won’t Go Away (New York: Random House, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Turner, The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities (New York: Basic Books, 2002), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cited in Donna J. Haraway, When Species Meet (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2008), 236.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See Andrew Newberg, Principles of Neurotheology (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ken Jackson and Arthur Marotti, ‘The Turn to Religion in Early Modern Studies’, Criticism 46: 1 (2004), 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham Hammill and Julia Lupton, ‘Sovereign, Citizens, and Saints: Political Theology and Renaissance Literature’, Religion and Literature 38: 3 (2006), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2006), 220.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Carl Schmitt, Political Theology: Four Chapters in the Concept of Sovereignty, ed. George Schwab (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Giorgio Agamben, States of Exception, trans. Kevin Attell (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. For a transversalist perspective on this notion of bare life, see Anna Kłosowska and Bryan Reynolds, ‘Civilizing Subjects, or Not: Montaigne’s Guide to Modernity, Agamben’s Exception, and Human Rights after Derrida’, in Bryan Reynolds, Transversal Subjects: From Montaigne to Deleuze after Derrida (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 203–61.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ann Rosalind Jones and Peter Stallybrass, Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Douglas Bruster, Shakespeare and the Question of Culture: Early Modern Literature and the Cultural Turn (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jonathan Gil Harris, Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Paul Cefalu & Bryan Reynolds

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cefalu, P., Reynolds, B. (2011). Tarrying with the Subjunctive, an Introduction. In: Cefalu, P., Reynolds, B. (eds) The Return of Theory in Early Modern English Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299986_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics