Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cluster Membership, Knowledge and SMEs’ Internationalization

  • Chapter
Network Strategies for Regional Growth

  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

Several streams of literature have acknowledged the increasing importance of knowledge in firms’ internationalization. Knowledge is considered to be fundamental to the firm’s commitments to foreign markets in the framework of the process model of internationalization (Johanson and Vahlne 1990). Knowledge is treated as an enabling resource in the international new venture literature (McDougall et al 1994; Oviatt and McDougall 1997; Autio et al. 2000). Knowledge facilitates the processes of identifying and exploiting opportunities abroad according to the international entrepreneurship approach (Zahra et al. 2000; Zahra 2005). Knowledge is also emphasized as an important factor leading to international engagement in the literature on managerial determinants of international behaviour (Bloodgood et al. 1996; Reuber and Fisher 1997). The importance of both planning-based knowledge (Yip et al. 2000) and experiential knowledge (Johanson and Vahlne 1990; Michailova and Wilson 2008) is recognized for driving internationalization of large, as well as small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The importance of SMEs has been growing, and at present they account for approximately 30 per cent of exports and 10 per cent of foreign direct investment globally (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD] 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • M. Andersson and C. Karlsson, ‘Knowledge in Regional Economic Growth: The Role of Knowledge Accessibility’, Industry and Innovation, 14 (2007): 129–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Astley and C. Fombrun, ‘Collective Strategy: Social Ecology of Organizational Environments’, Academy of Management Review, 8 (1983): 576–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. B. Audretsch, ‘Agglomeration and the Location of Innovative Activity’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14 (1998): 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Autio, H. J. Sapienza, and J. G. Almeida, ‘Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth’, Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5) (2000): 909–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Barkema and F. Vermeulen, ‘International Expansion Through Start-up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective’, Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1) (1998): 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Bloodgood, H. J. Sapienza, and J. G. Almeida, ‘The Internationalization of New High-Potential U.S. New Ventures’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20 (1996): 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Bönte, ‘Inter-Firm Trust in Buyer–Supplier Relations: Are Knowledge Spillovers and Geographical Proximity Relevant?’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 67 (3–4) (2008): 855–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. J. Buckley and M. J. Carter, ‘A Formal Analysis of Knowledge in Multinational Enterprises’, Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (2004): 371–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Bresser, ‘Matching Collective and Competitive Strategies’, Strategic Management Journal, 9 (1988): 375–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Chetty and H. Agndal, ‘Role of Inter-Organizational Networks and Interpersonal Networks in an Industrial District’, Regional Studies, 42 (2008): 175–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Chetty, ‘On the Crest of a Wave: Evolution of the New Zealand Boat Building Cluster’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 1 (2004): 313–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Chetty and C. Campbell-Hunt, ‘Explosive International Growth and Problems of Success amongst Small Firms’, International Small Business Journal, 21 (2003): 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. T. Crocombe, M. J. Enright and M. E. Porter, Upgrading New Zealand’s Competitive Advantage. (Auckland: Oxford University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Davenport, ‘Exploring the Role of Proximity in SME Knowledge-Acquisition’, Research Policy, 34 (2005): 683–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Denis and D. Depelteau, ‘Market Knowledge, Diversification, and Export Expansion’, Journal of International Business Studies, 16 (1985): 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Dhanaraj, M. A. Lyles, H. K. Steensma, and L. Tihanyi, ‘Managing Tacit and Explicit Knowledge Transfer in IJVs: The Role of Relational Embeddedness and the Impact on Performance’, Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (5) (2004): 428–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Elango and C. Pattnaik, ‘Building Capabilities for International Operations Through Networks: A Study of Indian Firms’, Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4) (2007): 541–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Ellis, ‘Social Ties and Foreign Market Entry’, Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2000): 443–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Eraydin and B. Armatli-Køroñlu, ‘Innovation, Networking and the New Industrial Clusters: The Characteristics of Networks and Local Innovation Capabilities in the Turkish Industrial Clusters’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 17 (2005): 237–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Eriksson and S. Chetty, ‘The Effect of Experience and Absorptive Capacity on Foreign Market Knowledge’, International Business Review, 12 (2003): 673–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Eriksson, J. Johanson, A. Majkgard, and D. Sharma, ‘Experiential Knowledge and Cost in the Internationalization Process’, Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (1997): 337–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Etzioni, and O. Etzioni, ‘Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communities: A Comparative Analysis’, Information Society, 15 (1999): 241–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Forsgren, ‘The Concept of Learning in the Uppsala Internationalization Process Model: A Critical View’, International Business Review, 11 (3) (2002): 257–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Ffowcs Williams, ‘Hard and Soft Networks: Helping Companies Cooperate for Export Growth’, New Zealand Strategic Management, 2 (1996): 30–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Ganesan, A. J. Malter, and A. Rindfleisch, ‘Does Distance Still Matter? Geographic Proximity and New Product Development’, Journal of Marketing, 69 (2005): 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Garud, and O. Nayyar, ‘Transformative Capacity: Continual Structuring by Intertemporal Technology Transfer’, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (1994): 365–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • X. Gellynck, B. Vermeire, and J. Viaene, ‘Innovation in Food Firms: Contribution of Regional Networks within the International Business Context’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19 (2007): 209–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Granovetter, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (1973): 1360–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Grabher, ‘Rediscovering the Social in the Economics of Interfirm Relationships’, in G. Grabher (ed.), The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks (London and New York: Routledge, 1993), pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Grant, ‘Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (1996): 109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Grant and C. Baden-Fuller, ‘A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 41 (2004): 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Gulati, ‘Alliances and Networks’,Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1998): 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. T. Hansen, ‘The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organizational Subunits’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1999): 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Harrison, ‘Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles?’, Regional Studies, 26 (1992): 469–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Henderson and K. B. Clark, ‘Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990): 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. Ibert, ‘Towards a Geography of Knowledge Creation: The Ambivalences between “Knowledge as an Object” and “Knowing in Practice” ’, Regional Studies, 41 (2007): 103–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. C. Inkpen, ‘Learning and Knowledge Acquisition through International Strategic Alliances’, Academy of Management Executive, 12 (1998): 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. C. Inkpen and E. W. K. Tsang, ‘Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer’, Academy of Management Review, 30 (2005): 146–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Johanson and J.-E. Vahlne, ‘The Internationalization Process of the Firm’, Journal of International Business Studies, 8 (1977): 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Johanson and J.-E. Vahlne, ‘The Mechanism of Internationalization’, International Marketing Review, 7 (1990): 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Johanson and J.-E. Vahlne, ‘Commitment and Opportunity Development in the Internationalization Process: A Note on the Uppsala Internationalization Process Model’, Management International Review, 46 (2006): 165–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Johanson and J.-E. Vahlne, ‘The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited: From Liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership’, Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (2009): 1411–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Jones, W. S. Hesterly, and S. P. Borgatti, ‘A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms’, Academy of Management Review, 22 (4) (1997): 911–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Kogut, ‘The Network as Knowledge: Generative Rules and the Emergence of Structure’, Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2000): 405–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. J. Lane and M. Lubatkin, ‘Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning’, Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1998): 461–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. E. Leamer and M. Storper, ‘The Economic Geography of the Internet Age’, Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (2001): 641–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Lemarie, V. Mangematin, and A. Torre, ‘Is the Creation and Development of Biotech SMEs Localized? Conclusions Drawn from the French Case’, Small Business Economics, 17 (2001): 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Z. Levin and R. Cross, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer’, Management Science, 50 (2004): 1477–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. MacMillan, M. McCaffery, and G. Van Wijk, ‘Competitors’ Responses to Easily Imitated New Products: Exploring Commercial Banking Product Introductions’, Strategic Management Journal, 6 (1) (1985): 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Madhok, ‘Know-How-, Experience- and Competition-related Considerations in Foreign Market Entry: An Exploratory Investigation’, International Business Review, 5 (1996): 339–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Malmberg and P. Maskell, ‘Localized Learning Revisited’, Growth and Change, 37 (1) (2006): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Matusik and C. W. Hill, ‘The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation and Competitive Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23 (1998): 680–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. P. McDougall, S. Shane, and B. M. Oviatt, ‘Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research’, Journal of Business Venturing, 9 (6) (1994): 469–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. K. McEvily and B. Chakravarthy, ‘The Persistence of Knowledge-Based Advantage: An Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technological Knowledge’, Strategic Management Journal, 23 (2002): 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Michailova and H. I. M. Wilson, ‘Small Firm Internationalization through Experiential Learning: The Moderating Role of Socialization Tactics’, Journal of World Business, 43 (2008): 243–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Morrison, ‘Gatekeepers of Knowledge within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How They Interact’, Regional Studies, 42 (6) (2008): 817–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Nahapiet and S. Ghoshal, ‘Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 23 (1998): 242–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Nelson and S. Winter, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Neergaard and J. P. Ulhoi, ‘Government Agency and Trust in the Formation and Transformation of Interorganizational Entrepreneurial Networks’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (2006): 519–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. M. Norman, ‘Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Loss, and Satisfaction in High Technology Alliances’, Journal of Business Research, 57 (2004): 610–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Trade and Enterprise, NZTE website on cluster initiatives, http://www.nzte.govt.nz/section/11962.aspx (accessed 3 October 2008).

  • M. Polanyi, Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-critical Philosophy (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (ed.), Bologna Italy, 14–15 June Workshop 2: SME Conference Business Symposium (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, SMEs and Entrepreneurship (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2006). Available online at http://www.oecd.org.document (accessed 14 November 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. M. Oviatt and P. P. McDougall, ‘Challenges for Internationalization Process Theory: The Case of International New Ventures’, Management International Review, 37 (2) (1997): 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Penrose, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford: Blackwell, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Porter, ‘Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy’, Economic Development Quarterly, 14 (2000): 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Porter, ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’, Harvard Business Review, November-December (1998): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Reed and R. J. De Fillippi, ‘Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 15 (1990): 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. R. Reuber and E. Fisher, ‘The Influence of the Management Team’s International Experience on the Internationalization Behaviors of SMEs’, Journal of International Business Studies, 28 (4) (1997): 807–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. S. Ring and A. H. Van de Ven, ‘Structuring Cooperative Relationships between Organizations’, Strategic Management Journal, 13 (1992): 483–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Rosenfeld, ‘Bringing Business Clusters into the Mainstream of Economic Development’, European Planning Studies, 5 (1997): 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. W. Rycroft, ‘Does Cooperation Absorb Complexity? Innovation Networks and the Speed and Spread of Complex Technological Innovation’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74 (2007): 565–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Schmitz, ‘Small Shoemakers and Fordist Giants: Tale of a Super Cluster’, World Development, 23 (1995): 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. A. Simon, ‘The Architecture of Complexity’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (1962): 467–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Tallman, M. Jenkins, N. Henry, and S. Pinch, ‘Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage’, Academy of Management Review, 29 (2004): 258–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Tsai and S. Ghoshal, ‘Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks’, Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1998): 464–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Uzzi, ‘Social Structure and Competition in Inter-Firm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (1997): 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Walker, B. Kogut, and W. Shan, ‘Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network’, Organization Science, 8 (1997): 109–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Waxell and A. Malmberg, ‘What is Global and What is Local in Knowledge-Generating Interaction? The Case of the Biotech Cluster in Uppsala, Sweden’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19 (March) (2007): 137–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Winter, ‘Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets’, in D. J. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (New York: Harper & Row, 1987): pp. 59–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. S. Yip, J. Gomez-Biscarri, and J. A. Monti, ‘The Role of the Internationalization Process in the Performance of New Internationalizing Firms’, Journal of International Marketing, 8 (2000): 10–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Yli-Renko, E. Autio, and H. Sapienza, ‘Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-based Firms’, Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2001): 587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Yli-Renko, E. Autio, and V. Tontti, ‘Social Capital, Knowledge, and the International Growth of Technology-Based New Firms’, International Business Review, 11 (2002): 279–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Zahra, ‘The Internationalization of Entrepreneurship’, Journal of International Business Studies, 26 (2005): 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Zahra, D. R. Ireland and M. A. Hitt, ‘International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning and Performance’, Academy of Management Journal, 43 (2000): 925–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Snejina Michailova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sylvie Chetty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University, Sweden

    Martin Johanson (professor in business administration) (professor in business administration)

  2. Mid-Sweden University, Sweden

    Heléne Lundberg (senior lecturer) (senior lecturer)

Copyright information

© 2011 Snejina Michailova and Sylvie Chetty

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michailova, S., Chetty, S. (2011). Cluster Membership, Knowledge and SMEs’ Internationalization. In: Johanson, M., Lundberg, H. (eds) Network Strategies for Regional Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299146_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation