Abstract
Critics over the years have found many ways to read the binary division of Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra between the poles of Rome and Egypt.2 Recently, postcolonial theory has informed readings that emphasize the “Otherness” of Egypt: as John Gillies has argued, the “‘orientalism’ of Cleopatra’s court — with its luxury, decadence, splendour, sensuality, appetite, effeminacy, and eunuchs — seems a systematic inversion of the legendary Roman values of temperance, manliness, courage, and pietas.”3 However, as these critics usually acknowledge, the contrast between the two blurs upon closer inspection, since, as Gillies again puts it, “only from the vantage point of Egypt does Rome seem Roman.”4
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Evans, ed., The Riverside Shakespeare (1974). All quotations from the play come from this edition.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Mary Thomas Crane
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crane, M.T. (2010). Roman World, Egyptian Earth: Cognitive Difference and Empire in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra 1 . In: Gallagher, L., Raman, S. (eds) Knowing Shakespeare. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299092_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299092_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32493-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29909-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)