Abstract
This chapter aims to give an empirical grounding to the argument for broadening how computing is considered. It explains why it is necessary to over-come the dominant, primarily technical perspective of academic computing studies via a technosocial view, in favor of a technosocial perspective. Along the way, it documents how a substantial portion of the problems people have in the design, implementation, and maintenance of computer-based systems that pretend to support human information practices is attributable to imbalances between and improper framings of the attention given respectively to social and technical perspectives on what it means to compute.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,
Ackerman, M. 2000. “The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility.” Human-Computer Interaction, 15: 179–203.
Beck, K. 2004. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (Second edition). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Beckett, J. 2009. “System Failure?” Guardian (July 9).
Bell, D. 1976. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. 1995. “User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 7(1): 73–98.
Blomberg, J. and L. Suchman. 1992. “Field Studies of Work and Co-Design.” Proceedings of PDC92: 101–2. Palo Alto CA: CPSR.
Bloor, D. 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.
Bradker, K., F. Kensing and J. Simonsen. 2004. Participatory IT Design. Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. Cambridee MA: MIT Press.
Bowker, G., L. Gasser, W. Turner and S. L. Star. 1997. Social Science, Technical Systems and Co-Operative Work. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Callon, M. and B. Latour. 1992. “Don’t Throw the Baby out with the Bath Water! A Reply to Collins and Yearly.” In Science as Practice and Culture, ed. A. Pickering Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 343–68.
Castells M. 1996. The Rise of Network Society, Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
Charette, R. 2005. “Why Software Fails.” IEEE Spectrum (September). Available at http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/why-software-fails/1, accessed Se tember 10 2009
Denning, P. J., D. E. Corner, D. Gries, M. C. Mulder, A. Tucker, A. J. Turner, and P. l. R. Young. 1989. “Computing as a Discipline.” Computer 22 (2): 63–70 (February).
Downey, G. 1988. The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist sits among Computer Engineers. New York: Routledge.
Ehn, P. 1988. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivcentrum.
Enclish-Lueck. I. 2002. Cultures@Silicon Valley Stanford University Press.
Escobar, A. 1994. “Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture.” Current Anthropology 35 (3): 211–31.
Fogel, K. 2006. Producing Open Source Software. Sebastopol CA: O’Reilly.
Forsythe, D. E. 2001. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.
Fox, J. 2009. The Myth of the Rational Market. New York: Harper Collins.
Fujimura, J. H. 1992. “Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects and ‘Translation.’” In Science as Practice and Culture, ed. A. Pickering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Galison, P. 1997. Image and Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garsten, C. 1994. Apple World. Stockholm: Stockholm University Studies in Social Anthropology.
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Gmdin, J. 1994. “Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers.” Communications of the ACM 37(1): 93–105.
Hakken, D., M. Teli and F. Pisanu. 2007. “The Internet as a Library-of-People: For a Cyberethnography of Online Groups.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8 (3).
Hakken, D. 2004. “‘Non-western’ Studies of Cyberspace Identity Formation.” Anthroplogi Indonesia 73: 32–9.
Hakken, D. 2003. The Knowledge Landscapes of Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.
Hakken, D. 2000. “Ethical Issues in the Ethnography of Cyberspace.” In Ethics and Anthropology: Facing Future Issues in Human Biology, Globalism and Cultural Property, eds. A-M. Cantwell, E. Friedlander and M. L. Tramm. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 170–86.
Hakken, D. 1999. “Towards and Anthropology of Cyberspace” (“Cap a una anthropolgia del ciberespai”). Revista d’Etnologia de Catalunya 14: 8–45. Special Issue on “Culture in Cyberspace: Towards a Digitized Society,” ed. M. J. Buxo.
Hakken, D. 1993. “Culture-Centered Computing: Social Policy and Development of New Information Technology in England and the United States.” Human Organization 50(4): 406–23.
Hakken, D. 1993. “Computing and Social Change: NewTechnology and Workplace Transformation 1980–90.” Annual Reviews in Anthropology 22: 107–32.
Hannerz, U. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women-The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books
Helmreich, S. 1999. Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artifical Life in a Digital World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hess, D. 2001. Selecting Technology, Science and Medicine: Alternative Pathways in Globalization, Vol.1: Nyskayuna, NY. Published by author.
Ito, M. n.d. “Networked Localities.” Available at http://www.itofisher.com/PEOPLE/mito. accessed January 21. 2009.
Huberman, B. A. 2001. The Laws of the Web. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Infonetics Research Report. 2005. The Costs of Enterprise Downtime. Available at: http://h71028.www7.hp.com/NonStopComputing/cache/426962-0-0-0-121.html, accessed January 21, 2009.
Ivanyukovich, G. R., V. Gangadharan, M. D’Andrea and M. Marchese. 2005. “Towards a Service-Oriented Development Methodology.” Transactions of the SDPS 9 (3): 53–62.
Jules-Rosette, B. 1990. Terminal Signs: Computers and Social Change in Africa. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kelty, C. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
Kensing, F. 2003. Methods and Practices in Participatory Design. Copenhagen: ITU Press.
Kruchten, P. 2000. The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction (second edition). Boston: Addison Wesley.
Latour, B. and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Lindlof, T. R. and B. C. Taylor. 2002. Qualitative Communication Research Methods (second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Medina, E. 2005. “Democratic Socialism, Cybernetic Socialism: Making the Chilean Economy Public.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, eds. B. Latour and P. Weibel. Cambridge: MIT Press, 708–21.
Miller, D. and D. Slater. 1999. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.
Pfaffenberger, B. 1992. “Social Anthropology of Technology.” Annual Review of Technology 21: 491–516.
Roland, N. and T Gieryn. 2008. “Transfer Troubles.” In Living in a Material World, eds. T. Pinch and R. Swedberg. Cambridge: MIT Press. 375–92.
Royce, W. 1970. “Managing the Development of Large Software Systems.” Proceedings IEEE WESCON26 (August): 1–9.
Rational Unified Process for Systems Engineering. 2002. “A Rational Software White Paper.” TP 165A, 5/02.
Shackelford, R., A. McGettrick, R. Sloan, H. Topi, G. Davies, R. Kamali, J. Cross, J. Impagliazzo, R. LeBlanc and B. Lunt. 2005. “Computing Curricula.” Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2006.
Shirky, C. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. London: Allen Lane.
Snitulnik. D. 1993. “Anthronology and Mass Media.” Annual Review of AnthroaoloQV 22.
Stallman, R. 2002. Free Software, Free Society. Boston: GNU Press.
Suchman, L., J. Blomberg, J. Orr and R. Trigg. 1999. “Reconstructing Technologies as Social Practice.” American Behavioral Scientists 43 (3): 392–408.
Taleb, N. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.
Torvalds, L. 2001. Just for Fun. New York: Harper Business.
Traweek. S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Weber, S. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Webster, F. 2006. Theories of the In formation Society. London: Routledge.
Weizenbaum, T. 1976. Computer Power and Human Reason. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Wikipedia. Social Computing. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_compguting, accessed January 24, 2009
,Winner. L. 1989. Mythinformation in the High-Tech Era. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Winner, L. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicam: University of Chicago Press.
Winner. L. 1977. Autonomous Technologies: Technics Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Wiener, N. 1948. Cybernetics: Or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Winograd, T. and B Flores. 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 David Hakken and Maurizio Teli
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hakken, D., Teli, M. (2010). The Empirical Case for Taking a Technosocial Approach to Computing. In: Kalantzis-Cope, P., Gherab-Martín, K. (eds) Emerging Digital Spaces in Contemporary Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299047_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299047_42
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32397-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29904-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)