Skip to main content

The Empirical Case for Taking a Technosocial Approach to Computing

  • Chapter
Emerging Digital Spaces in Contemporary Society
  • 752 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to give an empirical grounding to the argument for broadening how computing is considered. It explains why it is necessary to over-come the dominant, primarily technical perspective of academic computing studies via a technosocial view, in favor of a technosocial perspective. Along the way, it documents how a substantial portion of the problems people have in the design, implementation, and maintenance of computer-based systems that pretend to support human information practices is attributable to imbalances between and improper framings of the attention given respectively to social and technical perspectives on what it means to compute.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, M. 2000. “The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility.” Human-Computer Interaction, 15: 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K. 2004. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (Second edition). Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, J. 2009. “System Failure?” Guardian (July 9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. 1976. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes, G. and Bratteteig, T. 1995. “User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 7(1): 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, J. and L. Suchman. 1992. “Field Studies of Work and Co-Design.” Proceedings of PDC92: 101–2. Palo Alto CA: CPSR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradker, K., F. Kensing and J. Simonsen. 2004. Participatory IT Design. Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. Cambridee MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G., L. Gasser, W. Turner and S. L. Star. 1997. Social Science, Technical Systems and Co-Operative Work. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and B. Latour. 1992. “Don’t Throw the Baby out with the Bath Water! A Reply to Collins and Yearly.” In Science as Practice and Culture, ed. A. Pickering Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 343–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M. 1996. The Rise of Network Society, Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charette, R. 2005. “Why Software Fails.” IEEE Spectrum (September). Available at http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/why-software-fails/1, accessed Se tember 10 2009

  • Denning, P. J., D. E. Corner, D. Gries, M. C. Mulder, A. Tucker, A. J. Turner, and P. l. R. Young. 1989. “Computing as a Discipline.” Computer 22 (2): 63–70 (February).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, G. 1988. The Machine in Me: An Anthropologist sits among Computer Engineers. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. 1988. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivcentrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enclish-Lueck. I. 2002. Cultures@Silicon Valley Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. 1994. “Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture.” Current Anthropology 35 (3): 211–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, K. 2006. Producing Open Source Software. Sebastopol CA: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, D. E. 2001. Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. 2009. The Myth of the Rational Market. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, J. H. 1992. “Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects and ‘Translation.’” In Science as Practice and Culture, ed. A. Pickering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. 1997. Image and Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garsten, C. 1994. Apple World. Stockholm: Stockholm University Studies in Social Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmdin, J. 1994. “Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight Challenges for Developers.” Communications of the ACM 37(1): 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakken, D., M. Teli and F. Pisanu. 2007. “The Internet as a Library-of-People: For a Cyberethnography of Online Groups.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakken, D. 2004. “‘Non-western’ Studies of Cyberspace Identity Formation.” Anthroplogi Indonesia 73: 32–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakken, D. 2003. The Knowledge Landscapes of Cyberspace. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakken, D. 2000. “Ethical Issues in the Ethnography of Cyberspace.” In Ethics and Anthropology: Facing Future Issues in Human Biology, Globalism and Cultural Property, eds. A-M. Cantwell, E. Friedlander and M. L. Tramm. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 170–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakken, D. 1999. “Towards and Anthropology of Cyberspace” (“Cap a una anthropolgia del ciberespai”). Revista d’Etnologia de Catalunya 14: 8–45. Special Issue on “Culture in Cyberspace: Towards a Digitized Society,” ed. M. J. Buxo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakken, D. 1993. “Culture-Centered Computing: Social Policy and Development of New Information Technology in England and the United States.” Human Organization 50(4): 406–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakken, D. 1993. “Computing and Social Change: NewTechnology and Workplace Transformation 1980–90.” Annual Reviews in Anthropology 22: 107–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannerz, U. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women-The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, S. 1999. Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artifical Life in a Digital World. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. 2001. Selecting Technology, Science and Medicine: Alternative Pathways in Globalization, Vol.1: Nyskayuna, NY. Published by author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M. n.d. “Networked Localities.” Available at http://www.itofisher.com/PEOPLE/mito. accessed January 21. 2009.

  • Huberman, B. A. 2001. The Laws of the Web. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infonetics Research Report. 2005. The Costs of Enterprise Downtime. Available at: http://h71028.www7.hp.com/NonStopComputing/cache/426962-0-0-0-121.html, accessed January 21, 2009.

  • Ivanyukovich, G. R., V. Gangadharan, M. D’Andrea and M. Marchese. 2005. “Towards a Service-Oriented Development Methodology.” Transactions of the SDPS 9 (3): 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jules-Rosette, B. 1990. Terminal Signs: Computers and Social Change in Africa. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelty, C. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kensing, F. 2003. Methods and Practices in Participatory Design. Copenhagen: ITU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruchten, P. 2000. The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction (second edition). Boston: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. and S. Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindlof, T. R. and B. C. Taylor. 2002. Qualitative Communication Research Methods (second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, E. 2005. “Democratic Socialism, Cybernetic Socialism: Making the Chilean Economy Public.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, eds. B. Latour and P. Weibel. Cambridge: MIT Press, 708–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. and D. Slater. 1999. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffenberger, B. 1992. “Social Anthropology of Technology.” Annual Review of Technology 21: 491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, N. and T Gieryn. 2008. “Transfer Troubles.” In Living in a Material World, eds. T. Pinch and R. Swedberg. Cambridge: MIT Press. 375–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, W. 1970. “Managing the Development of Large Software Systems.” Proceedings IEEE WESCON26 (August): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rational Unified Process for Systems Engineering. 2002. “A Rational Software White Paper.” TP 165A, 5/02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, R., A. McGettrick, R. Sloan, H. Topi, G. Davies, R. Kamali, J. Cross, J. Impagliazzo, R. LeBlanc and B. Lunt. 2005. “Computing Curricula.” Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. 2008. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snitulnik. D. 1993. “Anthronology and Mass Media.” Annual Review of AnthroaoloQV 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallman, R. 2002. Free Software, Free Society. Boston: GNU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L., J. Blomberg, J. Orr and R. Trigg. 1999. “Reconstructing Technologies as Social Practice.” American Behavioral Scientists 43 (3): 392–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. 2007. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torvalds, L. 2001. Just for Fun. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traweek. S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. 2006. Theories of the In formation Society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizenbaum, T. 1976. Computer Power and Human Reason. New York: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia. Social Computing. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_compguting, accessed January 24, 2009

  • ,Winner. L. 1989. Mythinformation in the High-Tech Era. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicam: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner. L. 1977. Autonomous Technologies: Technics Out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. 1948. Cybernetics: Or the Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. and B Flores. 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 David Hakken and Maurizio Teli

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hakken, D., Teli, M. (2010). The Empirical Case for Taking a Technosocial Approach to Computing. In: Kalantzis-Cope, P., Gherab-Martín, K. (eds) Emerging Digital Spaces in Contemporary Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299047_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics