Skip to main content

Abstract

We analyze the properties of different estimators of multivariate volatilities in the presence of microstructure noise, with particular focus on the Fourier estimator. This estimator is consistent in the case of asynchronous data and is robust to microstructure effects; further, we prove the positive semi-definiteness of the estimated covariance matrix. The in-sample and forecasting properties of the Fourier method are analyzed through Monte Carlo simulations. We study the economic benefit of applying the Fourier covariance estimation methodology over other estimators in the presence of market microstructure noise from the perspective of an asset-allocation decision problem. We find that using Fourier methodology yields statistically significant economic gains under strong microstructure effects.

References

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aït-Sahalia, Y. and Mancini, L. (2008) “Out of Sample Forecasts of Quadratic Variations”, Journal of Econometrics, 147 (1): 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aït-t-Sahalia, Y., Mykland, P. and Zhang, L. (2005) “How Often to Sample a Continuous-Time Process in the Presence of Market Microstructure Noise”, Review ofFinancial Studies, 18 (2): 351–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, T. and Bollerslev, T. (1998) “Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models do Provide Accurate Forecasts”, International Economic Review, 39 (4): 885–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandi, F.M. and Russell, J.R. (2006) “Separating Market Microstructure Noise from Volatility”, Journal of Financial Economics, 79 (3): 655–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandi, F.M. and Russell, J.R. (2008) “Microstructure Noise, Realized Variance and Optimal Sampling”, Review of Economic Studies, 75 (2): 339–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandi, F.M., Russel, J.R. and Zhu, Y. (2008) “Using High-frequency Data in Dynamic Portfolio Choice”, Econometric Reviews, 27 (1–3): 163–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E., Hansen, P.R., Lunde, A. and Shephard, N. (2008a) “Multivariate Realised Kernels: Consistent Positive Semi-Definite Estimators of the Covariation of Equity Prices with Noise and Non-synchronous Trading”, Economics Series Working Paper No 397, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E., Hansen, P.R., Lunde, A. and Shephard, N. (2008b) “Designing Realized Kernels to Measure the Ex-Post Variation of Equity Prices in the Presence of Noise”, Econometrica, 76 (6): 1481–1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barucci, E., Magno, D. and Mancino, M.E. (2008) “Forecasting Volatility with High Frequency Data in the Presence of Microstructure Noise”, Working paper, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pooter, M., Martens, M. and van Dijk, D. (2008) “Predicting the Daily Covariance Matrix for S&P100 Stocks Using Intraday Data: But Which Frequency to Use?” Econometric Reviews, 27 (1): 199–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. and Colacito, R. (2006) “Testing and Valuing Dynamic Correlations for Asset Allocation”, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24 (2): 238–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epps, T. (1979) “Comovements in Stock Prices in the Very Short Run”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74 (366): 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., Kirby, C. and Ostdiek, B. (2001) “The Economic Value of Volatility Timing”, The Journal of Finance, LVI (1): 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., Kirby, C. and Ostdiek, B. (2003) “The Economic Value of Volatility Timing Using ‘Realized’ Volatility”, The Journal of Financial Economics, 67 (3): 473–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatheral, J. and Oomen, R.C.A. (2010) “Zero-intelligence Realized Variance Estimation”, Finance and Stochastics, 14 (2): 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J.E. and Oomen, R.C.A. (2010) “Covariance Measurement in the Presence of Non-Synchronous Trading and Market Microstructure Noise”, Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R. and Lunde, A. (2006) “Realized Variance and Market Microstructure Noise (with discussions)”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 24 (2): 127–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, T. and Yoshida, N. (2005) “On Covariance Estimation of Nonsynchronously Observed Diffusion Processes”, Bernoulli, 11 (2): 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnebrock, S. and Podolskij, M. (2008) “An Econometric Analysis of Modulated Realized Covariance, Regression and Correlation in Noisy Diffusion Models”, Unpublished paper, Oxford Financial Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyj, L., Ostdiek, B. and Ensor, K. (2009) “Realized Covariance Estimation in Dynamic Portfolio Optimization”, Working Paper, Quantitative Products Laboratory, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Large, J. (2007) “Accounting for the Epps Effect: Realized Covariation, Cointegration and Common Factors”, Working Paper, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malliavin, P. (1995) Integration and Probability, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malliavin, P. and Mancino, M.E. (2002) “Fourier Series Method for Measurement of Multivariate Volatilities”, Finance and Stochastics, 6 (1): 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malliavin, P. and Mancino, M.E. (2009) “A Fourier Transform Method for Nonparametric Estimation of Multivariate Volatility”, Annals of Statistics, 37 (4): 1983–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancino, M.E. and Sanfelici, S. (2008a) “Robustness of Fourier Estimator of Integrated Volatility in the Presence of Microstructure Noise”, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52 (6): 2966–2989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancino, M.E. and Sanfelici, S. (2008b) “Estimating Covariance via Fourier Method in the Presence of Asynchronous Trading and Microstructure Noise”, Working Paper, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, M. (2004) “Estimating Unbiased and Precise Realized Covariances”, EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper No. 4299, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. and Zarnowitz, V. (1969) “The Evaluation of Economic Forecasts”, in J. Mincer (ed.), Economic Forecasts and Expectations, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1984) “A Simple Measure of the Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market”, Journal of Finance, 39 (4): 1127–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voev, V. and Lunde, A. (2007) “Integrated Covariance Estimation Using High-Frequency Data in the Presence of Noise”, Journal of Financial Econometrics, 5 (1): 68–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Mykland, P. and AÏt-Sahalia, Y. (2005) “A Tale of Two Time Scales: Determining Integrated Volatility with Noisy High Frequency Data”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100 (1): 1394–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Maria Elvira Mancino and Simona Sanfelici

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mancino, M.E., Sanfelici, S. (2011). Covariance Estimation and Dynamic Asset-Allocation under Microstructure Effects via Fourier Methodology. In: Gregoriou, G.N., Pascalau, R. (eds) Financial Econometrics Modeling: Market Microstructure, Factor Models and Financial Risk Measures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230298101_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics