Abstract
During the course of the First World War a new form of colonial governance developed in response to the need to mobilise and extract local resources for the military effort. This involved a deeper penetration of local societies and a re-working of state-society relations in each region. It occurred as the civil and military authorities embedded themselves within existing local social organisation and interfered with indigenous structures and hierarchies of power. The nature and dynamics of this extension of the arms of imposed state structures were far from monolithic, and reflected the uneven exposure of each case study to centralised control — both British and Ottoman — before 1914. Taken together, they offer a comparative analysis of how the colonial authorities managed and regulated the mobilisation of different peasant economies for participation in large-scale, industrialised, warfare.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
S. Heydemann (2000) ‘War, Institutions, and Social Change in the Middle East,’ in S. Heydemann (ed.), War, Institutions, and Social Change in the Middle East (Berkeley: University of California Press), p.8.
M. Redha Bhacker (2009) ‘The Cultural Unity of the Gulf and the Indian Ocean: A Longue Duree Historical Perspective,’ in L.G. Potter (ed.), The Persian Gulf in History (New York: Palgrave), p.166.
R. Holland (1999) ‘The British Empire and the Great War, 1914–1918,’ in J.M. Brown & W.R. Louis (eds), The Oxford History of the British Empire — Volume IV — The Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p.125.
J. Fisher (1999) Curzon and British Imperialism in the Middle East 1916–1919 (London: Frank Cass), pp.167–70.
B. Millman (2001) Pessimism and British War Policy 1916–1918 (London: Frank Cass), pp.12–13.
P. Mohs (2008) British Intelligence and the Arab Revolt: The First Modern Intelligence War (London: Routledge), p.33.
J. Nevakivi (1969) Britain, France and the Arab Middle East, 1914–1920 (London: Athlone Press), p.43; Nevakivi was referring to the incompatibility of the Hussein-McMahon correspondence, the Sykes-Picot agreement and the Balfour declaration.
T.J. Parrs (1998) ‘British Middle East Policy-Making After the First World War: The Lawrentian and Wilsonian Schools,’ Historical Journal, XLI, 774.
B. Schwarz (1993) ‘Divided Attention: Britain’s Perception of a German Threat to Her Eastern Frontier in 1918,’ Journal of Contemporary History, XXVIII, 104–05; Paper by Admiral Sir Edmond Slade on the Petroleum Situation in the British Empire, 29 July 1918, TNA: PRO CAB 21/119.
R. Adelson (1995) London and the Invention of the Middle East: Money, Power and War, 1902–1922 (Yale: Yale University Press), p.4.
G.R. Atiyyah (1973) Iraq: 1908–1921 A Socio-Political Study (Beirut: The Arab Institute for Research and Publishing), p.158.
H. Young (1933) The Independent Arab (London: John Murray), p.73;
B.C. Busch (1971) Britain, India and the Arabs (Berkeley: University of California Press), p.70.
R. Owen (1969) Cotton and the Egyptian Economy 1820–1914: A Study in Trade and Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p.xxiii.
J.C.B. Richmond (1971) Egypt 1798–1952: Her Advance Towards a Modern Identity (London: Methuen), p.169.
L. Grafftey-Smith (1970) Bright Levant (London: John Murray), p.24.
J. Marlowe (1965) Anglo-Egyptian Relations 1800–1956 (London: Frank Cass), pp.213–14.
M.W. Daly (1997) The Sirdar: Sir Reginald Wingate and the British Empire in the Middle East (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society), p.203;
H. Strachan (2001) The First World War. Volume I: To Arms (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p.701.
J.E. Marshall (1928) The Egyptian Enigma (London: John Murray), p.141; Marshall was a Judge in the Egyptian Court of Appeal throughout the war years.
P.G. Elgood (1924) Egypt and the Army (London: Arnold), p.85.
E.W. Poulson-Newman (1928) Great Britain in Egypt (London: Cassell), p.210.
R. Wingate (1955) Wingate of the Sudan (London: John Murray), p.206; letter from Hardinge to Wingate, 14 February 1917, CUL Hardinge papers, 1917 vol. 1; letter from Graham to Hardinge, 9 September 1916, CUL Hardinge papers, 1916 vol. 4.
A.J. Stockwell (1988) ‘The War and the British Empire,’ in J. Turner (ed.), Britain and the First World War (London: Unwin Hyman), p.44.
Amine Youssef, Memorandum, 23 March 1919, TNA: PRO FO 371/3715.
M.E. Yapp (1987) The Making of the Modern Near East, 1792–1923 (London: Longman), p.295; letter from Wingate to Hardinge, 6 May 1917, CUL Hardinge papers, 1917 vol. 4.
J. Darwin (1981) Britain, Egypt and the Middle East: Imperial Policy in the Aftermath of War 1918–1922 (London: Macmillan), p.65.
The proportion of Egyptians employed in higher government positions actually decreased from 27.7% in 1905 to 23% in 1920; Elgood, Egypt and the Army, p.334; also P.J. Vatikiotis (1969) The Modern History of Egypt (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson), p.252.
G. Kramer (2008) A History of Palestine: From the Ottoman Conquest to the Founding of the State of Israel (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp.156–59.
C. Dewey (1979) ‘The Government of India’s “New Industrial Policy,” 1900–1925: Formation and Failure,’ in C. Dewey & K.N. Chaudhuri (eds), Economy and Society: Essays in Indian Economic and Social History (New Delhi: Oxford University Press), p.232.
B.R. Tomlinson (1979) The Political Economy of the Raj 1914–1947: The Economics of Decolonisation in India (London: Macmillan), p.58.
Ibid. p.21; also L.F. Rushbrook Williams (1932) ‘India and the War,’ in H.H. Dodwell (ed.), The Cambridge History of the British Empire. Volume V — The Indian Empire 1858–1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p.483.
M. O’Dwyer (1921) ‘India’s Man-Power in the War,’ The Army Quarterly, II, 255.
E. Candler (1919) The Sepoy (London: John Murray), p.218.
F.W. Perry (1988) The Commonwealth Armies: Manpower and Organisation in Two World Wars (Manchester: Manchester University Press), p.95; telegram from Montagu to Chelmsford, 2 April 1918, IOR Chelmsford papers, Mss Eur E264, box 9; letter from Chelmsford to Governors, Lieutenant-Governors and Chief Commissioners, 12 April 1918, IOR Chelmsford papers, Mss Eur E264, box 20.
D. Kumar (1983) ‘The Fiscal System,’ in D. Kumar & T. Raychaudhuri (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of India. Vol.2: c.1757–c.1970 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p.921.
R. Visser (2005) Basra: The Failed Gulf State: Separatism and Nationalism in Southern Iraq (Lit Verlag: Munster), p.5.
T. Karim (2003) ‘Tribes and Nationalism: Tribal Political Culture and Behaviour in Iraq, 1914–1920,’ in F. Abdul-Jabbar & H. Dawod (eds), Tribes and Power: Nationalism and Ethnicity in the Middle East (London: Saqi Books), p.288.
A. Wilson (1930) Loyalties: Mesopotamia: Volume I — 1914–1917 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p.64.
T. Dodge (2003) Inventing Iraq: The Failure of Nation Building and a History Denied (London: Hurst), pp.70–71.
R. Matthee (2009) ‘Boom and Bust: The Port of Basra in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries,’ in L.G. Potter (ed.), The Persian Gulf in History (New York: Palgrave), p.106.
M. Hughes (1999) Allenby and British Strategy in the Middle East 1917–1919 (London: Cass), p.93.
C. Tripp (2007) A History of Iraq (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p.31.
P. Sluglett (2007) Britain in Iraq 1914–1922 (New York: Columbia University Press), p.4
V.H. Rothwell (1970) ‘Mesopotamia in British War Aims, 1914–1918,’ Historical Journal, XII, 274.
P. Graves (1941) The Life of Sir Percy Cox (London: Hutchinson), p.185;
E. Monroe (1973) Philby of Arabia (London: Faber), p.47, Dodge, Inventing Iraq, p.64.
P. Ireland (1937) Iraq: A Study in Political Development (London: Cape), p.94.
B.C. Busch (1971) Britain, India and the Arabs, 1914–21 (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp.133–34.
Sir Mark Sykes, ‘Note — The Problem of the Near East,’ 20 June 1916, TNA: PRO CAB 17/175.
S. Longrigg (1953) Iraq, 1900 to 1950: A Political, Social and Economic History (London: Oxford University Press), p.82.
M. Macmillan (2001) Peacemakers: The Paris Conference of 1919 and its Attempt to End War (London: John Murray), p.21.
J. Grigg (2002) Lloyd George: Volume IV — War Leader, 1916–1918 (London: Allen Lane), p.382.
W. Marshall (1929) Memories of Four Fronts (London: Ernest Benn), p.329.
A. Wilson (1931) Mesopotamia 1917–1920: A Clash of Loyalties (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp.2–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Kristian Coates Ulrichsen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ulrichsen, K.C. (2011). Deepening the Colonial State. In: The Logistics and Politics of the British Campaigns in the Middle East, 1914–22. Studies in Military and Strategic History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297609_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297609_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31318-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29760-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)