Skip to main content

Partnerships to the East and South: A ‘Win-Win’ Policy

  • Chapter
  • 418 Accesses

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges Series ((NSECH))

Abstract

In this chapter we analyze the effects of NATO partnerships in the European rim, to the south (Balkans) and to the east (Central Europe and beyond). The states included are: Bosnia-Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro in the Balkans, and Moldova, Armenia, Azerbadijan, Kazakhstan, Georgia, and the Ukraine in the Caucausus and Central Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aftenposten, 27 April 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, I. and Barnes, P. (2007) ‘Enlargement’, in M. Cini (ed.) European Union Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, I. and Barnes, P. (2010) ‘Enlargement’, in Cini, M. and Borragan (2010) European Union Politics, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baylis, J. and Wirtz, J. (2007) ‘Introduction’, in J. Baylis, J. Wirtz, E. Cohen and C. S. Gray (eds) Strategy in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. and Wæver, O. (2004) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (ed.) (2007) Security Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheciu, A. (2009) NATO in the New Europe: The Politics of International Socialization after the Cold War (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giragosian, R. (2008) ‘Georgian Planning Leads to Failure’, Asia Times,21 August 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlary, J. H. (2002) Intervention for Human Rights in Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (2008) ‘US and NATO Military Cooperation with Kazakhstan: The Need for a New Approach’, Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol. 21, pp. 615–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. R. (2007) NATO’s New Mission: Projecting Stability in a Post-Cold War World (Westport, CT: Greenwood).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (2010) ‘NATO’s Partners in Afghanistan: Impact and Purpose’, UNISCI Discussion Papers, No. 22, January, pp. 92–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (1999) ‘Membership Action Plan’, http://www.nato.int (home page), date accessed 20 April 2010.

  • NATO (2005) ‘NATO: Security Through Partnership’, http://www.nato.int (home page), date accessed 20 April 2010.

  • NATO (2007a) Partners in Southern Caucasus (NATO: Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2007b) NATO-Ukraine: A Distinctive Partnership (NATO: Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2008) ‘NATO-Georgia Commission’, http://www.nato.int (home page), date accessed 20 April 2010.

  • NATO (2008b) ‘Bucharest Summit Declaration’, http://www.nato.int (home page), date accessed 20 April 2010.

  • NATO (2009) Partners in Central Asia (NATO: Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO (2010a) ‘NATO’s Relations with Georgia’, http://www.nato.int (home page), date accessed 20 April 2010.

  • NATO (2010b) ‘NATO’s Relation with Bosnia-Herzegovina’, http://www.nato.int (home page), date accessed 20 April 2010.

  • NATO (2010c) ‘NATO’s Relations with Azerbadijan’, http://www.nato.int (home page), date accessed 20 April 2010.

  • NATO (2010d) ‘NATOs Relations with Armenia’, http://www.nato.int (home page), date accessed 20 April 2010.

  • Schimmelpfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2005) The Politics of EU Enlargement: Theoretical Appraoches (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, U. (2001) ‘The Path to Eastern Enlargement’, paper presented to ISA, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, G. B. (1998) The NATO Enlargement Debate, 1990–1997 (Washington: CSIS, The Washington Papers).

    Google Scholar 

  • østerud, ø. (2010) Hva er krig (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Janne Haaland Matlary

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matlary, J.H. (2011). Partnerships to the East and South: A ‘Win-Win’ Policy. In: Edström, H., Matlary, J.H., Petersson, M. (eds) NATO: The Power of Partnerships. New Security Challenges Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297500_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics