Skip to main content

Understanding innovation

  • Chapter
  • 151 Accesses

Abstract

Mobile telephony is actually quite an old idea. The concept of being able to communicate without wires goes back to the first radio phones developed before the Second World War. The first automated mobile phone service was developed by Ericsson in the 1950s, and the first modern cell phone was sold by Motorola in the 1970s. Both firms then developed many new products, in particular sophisticated handsets, based on their technology and engineering skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Afuah, A. (2003), “Static Models of Innovation” in Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, pp. 14–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R. and Schoemaker, J. H. (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. and Tushman, M. (1990), “Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Design”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 604–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCG (Boston Consulting Group) (2009), Innovation 2009: Making Hard Decisions in the Downturn ( Boston, MA, BCG).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkun, S. (2007), The Myths of Innovation, Sebastopol, CA, O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (1997), The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail ( Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. and Raynor, M. E. (2003), The Innovator’s Solution ( Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila, T., Epstein, M. J. and Shelton, R. (2006), Making Innovation Work ( Philadelphia, PA, Wharton School Publishing ), pp. 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. and Lumpkin, G. T. (2003), Strategic Management ( Boston, MA, McGraw-Hill/Irwin ), Ch. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, H. (2004), They Made America. From the Steam Engine to the Search Engine. Two Centuries of Innovators, New York, Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (2005), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (Oxford University Press), pp. 433–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, C. (2001), “Should We Beware of the Precautionary Principle?”, Economic Policy, Vol. 33, pp. 303–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. M. and Clark, K. B. (1990), “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failures of Established Firms”, Administrative Sciences Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp. 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G. and Kuratko, D. F. (2009), “Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy”, Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 33, pp. 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. A. (2002), Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High-Tech Products to Mainstream Customers, New York, Harper Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/Eurostat (2005), Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data–The Oslo Manual, 3rd edn, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. A. (2006), Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, 2nd edn, Boston, MA, McGraw-Hill, pp. 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis, Boston, MA, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (2006), Exploring Innovation, Boston, MA, McGraw-Hill, pp. 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., Bessant, D. and Pavitt, K. (2001), Managing Innovation, 2nd edn, Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley, pp. 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. and Anderson, P. (1988), “Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments”, Administrative Sciences Quarterly, Vol. 31, pp. 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. and O’Reilly, C. A. (2002), Winning through Innovation, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press, Ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M. (2005), Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986), “Central Problems in the Management of Innovation”, Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R. and Venkataraman, S. (2008), The Innovation Journey (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Benoît Gailly

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gailly, B. (2011). Understanding innovation. In: Developing Innovative organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295285_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics