Abstract
Almost ten years before having drafted the text “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns” (1988),1 Benjamin Constant published a pamphlet entitled “Political Reactions” (1998).2 There, he criticized a “German philosopher” for holding a view that made society impossible, namely, that truthfulness was a person’s unconditional obligation (Constant 1998: 493). One year later, Kant replied to this pamphlet by arguing against the legal implications of Constant’s criticism, to wit, against “a supposed right to lie from philanthropy” (VRML: 8:425, 611).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Note
See, for instance, Habermas’s attempt, in Between Facts and Norms, to counter the interpretation of rights as values (1996: esp. 253–67). See also David Strauss’s review of Dworkin’s Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Sorin Baiasu
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baiasu, S. (2011). Introduction. In: Kant and Sartre. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295162_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295162_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-27991-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29516-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)