Abstract
This chapter addresses some of the problems faced by both social scientists and historians when they attempt to think in comparative terms about the phenomenon we habitually assemble under the heading of ‘fascism’ and, more especially, when they attempt to ‘theorize’ these phenomena.1 The problems I will deal with here—and in the limited space of this chapter I cannot deal with all the problems—derive from two conceptions of the research process, two basic assumptions that are widespread among historians of fascisms, and indeed across the social sciences as a whole.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
G. Allardyce, ‘What Fascism is Not: Thoughts on the Deflation of a Concept’, The American Historical Review 84, no. 2, 1979, pp. 367–88.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Michel Dobry
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dobry, M. (2011). Desperately Seeking ‘Generic Fascism’: Some Discordant Thoughts on the Academic Recycling of Indigenous Categories. In: Pinto, A.C. (eds) Rethinking the Nature of Fascism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295001_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295001_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-27296-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29500-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)