Skip to main content

On the Possibility of Cinematic Philosophy

  • Chapter
New Takes in Film-Philosophy

Abstract

For some years now, there has been an active debate about the possibility of what I am calling ‘cinematic philosophy’. By that term, I refer to philosophy that is done on, in, or through film. I believe this to be a neutral way in which to indicate the sort of phenomenon that is also called ‘film-philosophy’ (see this volume), ‘film-as-philosophy’ (Smith and Wartenberg, 2006), and ‘filmosophy’ (Frampton, 2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cavell, S., 2004. Cities of Words: Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D., 2005. ‘The Matrix as Metaphysics’. In C. Grau, ed., Philosophers Explore ‘The Matrix’. New York: Oxford, pp. 132–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., 1986 and 1989. Cinema, Volume 1 and 2. Translated by H. Tomlinson and B. Hasberjam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R., 1993. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated by D. A. Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, R., 2009. ‘Philosophy In/Of/As/And Film’. Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind 3.1, pp. 109–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, D., 2006. Filmosophy. London: Wallflower Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendler, T. S., 2000. Thought Experiment: On the Powers and Limits of Imaginary Cases. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger, H., 2004. ‘Cinematic Philosophy in Le Feu follet: The Search for a Meaningful Life’. Film and Philosophy 8, pp. 74–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 1933. The Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by N. K. Smith. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, D., forthcoming. ‘The Third Man: Ethics, Aesthetics, Irony’. In W. Jones and S. Vice, eds. Ethics in Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Mi Doeuff, ., 1989. The Philosophical Imaginary. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, P., 2006. ‘Theses on Cinema as Philosophy’. In M. Smith and T. Wartenberg, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, S., 2008. On Film, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F., 1978. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Translated by W. Kaufmann. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, 1992. The Republic. Translated by G.M.A Grube and C.D.C Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponech, T., ‘The Substance of Cinema’. In M. Smith and T. Wartenberg, 2006, pp. 187–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B., 2000. ‘The Philosophical Limits of Film’. Film and Philosophy (Special Edition on Woody Allen), pp. 163–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2008. ‘Film’s Limits: The Sequel’. Film and Philosophy 12, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2009. ‘Film’s Limits Again’, Film and Philosophy 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, S., 2007. ‘Emotion Capture: Affect in Digital Film’. Projections: The Journal of Movies and Mind 1.2, pp. 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., 2006. ’Film Art, Argument, and Ambiguity’, in Smith and Wartenberg, pp. 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. and Wartenberg, T.E., 2006. Thinking Through Cinema: Film as Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg, T., 2007. Thinking On Screen: Film as Philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 2010. ‘Response to My Critics’. Film and Philosophy 14, pp. 123–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. M. 2006. ‘Transparency and Twist in Narrative Fiction Film’ in M. Smith and T. Wartenberg, eds (2006), pp. 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Thomas E. Wartenberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wartenberg, T.E. (2011). On the Possibility of Cinematic Philosophy. In: Carel, H., Tuck, G. (eds) New Takes in Film-Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics