Abstract
In 1899 the English filmmaker George Albert Smith produced a film called The Kiss in the Tunnel. Smith’s film began with a shot of a train entering a tunnel, cut to a couple in a private carriage stealing a kiss and then returned to a shot of the train leaving the tunnel. Although silent, monochrome and only 67 seconds long, this three-shot film anticipates aspects of the dominant modes and techniques of filmmaking (narrative, editing, action continuity) that are with us today. Similarly, the film’s combination of the actual and the fictional raises a number of profound questions about the nature of cinema which still resonate. Smith’s film already sketches out the medium specificity of films and provides us with many of the fundamental elements of the cinematic experience. Despite the silence and the brevity Smith’s film is still just that: a fully formed film. Nothing is waiting to be produced that will prevent us calling our experience of The Kiss in the Tunnel a cinematic one.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Johnson G., 1993, ‘Ontology and Painting’ in G. Johnson (ed.) The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty M., 1993, ‘Eye and Mind’ in G. Johnson (ed.) The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty M., 1962, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith, London: Routledge.
Merleau-Ponty M., 1964, ‘Film and the New Psychology’, in Sense and Non-Sense, trans. H. Dreyfus and P. Dreyfus, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty M., 1968, The Visible and the Invisible, trans. A. Lingis, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Merleau-Ponty N., 1973, Adventures of the Dialectic, trans. J. Bien, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Sobchack V., 1992, The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tuck G., 2007, ‘The Embodied Pleasure of Invisible Sex: Cinematic Meaning, Sexual Metaphors and the Dialectics of Editing’, in T. Jeffers-McDonald & E. Wells (eds) Realities and Remediations: Film at the Limits of Representation, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Williams L., 2008 ‘Of Kisses and Ellipses: The Long Adolescence of American Movies (1896–1963) Screening Sex, Durham CA: Duke University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Greg Tuck
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tuck, G. (2011). Art, Cinema, Sex, Ontology: Maurice Merleau-Ponty and the In-visible of Cinema. In: Carel, H., Tuck, G. (eds) New Takes in Film-Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-25029-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29485-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)