Skip to main content

Art, Cinema, Sex, Ontology: Maurice Merleau-Ponty and the In-visible of Cinema

  • Chapter
New Takes in Film-Philosophy
  • 517 Accesses

Abstract

In 1899 the English filmmaker George Albert Smith produced a film called The Kiss in the Tunnel. Smith’s film began with a shot of a train entering a tunnel, cut to a couple in a private carriage stealing a kiss and then returned to a shot of the train leaving the tunnel. Although silent, monochrome and only 67 seconds long, this three-shot film anticipates aspects of the dominant modes and techniques of filmmaking (narrative, editing, action continuity) that are with us today. Similarly, the film’s combination of the actual and the fictional raises a number of profound questions about the nature of cinema which still resonate. Smith’s film already sketches out the medium specificity of films and provides us with many of the fundamental elements of the cinematic experience. Despite the silence and the brevity Smith’s film is still just that: a fully formed film. Nothing is waiting to be produced that will prevent us calling our experience of The Kiss in the Tunnel a cinematic one.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Johnson G., 1993, ‘Ontology and Painting’ in G. Johnson (ed.) The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M., 1993, ‘Eye and Mind’ in G. Johnson (ed.) The Merleau-Ponty Aesthetics Reader: Philosophy and Painting, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M., 1962, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M., 1964, ‘Film and the New Psychology’, in Sense and Non-Sense, trans. H. Dreyfus and P. Dreyfus, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty M., 1968, The Visible and the Invisible, trans. A. Lingis, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty N., 1973, Adventures of the Dialectic, trans. J. Bien, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack V., 1992, The Address of the Eye: A Phenomenology of Film Experience, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck G., 2007, ‘The Embodied Pleasure of Invisible Sex: Cinematic Meaning, Sexual Metaphors and the Dialectics of Editing’, in T. Jeffers-McDonald & E. Wells (eds) Realities and Remediations: Film at the Limits of Representation, Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams L., 2008 ‘Of Kisses and Ellipses: The Long Adolescence of American Movies (1896–1963) Screening Sex, Durham CA: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Greg Tuck

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tuck, G. (2011). Art, Cinema, Sex, Ontology: Maurice Merleau-Ponty and the In-visible of Cinema. In: Carel, H., Tuck, G. (eds) New Takes in Film-Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics